Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments

Eileen M. Roscoe, Wayne W Fisher, Ashley C. Glover, Valerie M. Volkert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Performance feedback has facilitated the acquisition and maintenance of a wide range of behaviors (e.g., health-care routines, seat-belt use). Most researchers have attributed the effectiveness of performance feedback to (a) its discriminative functions, (b) its reinforcing functions, or (c) the combination of the two. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the relative contributions of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of performance feedback by comparing a condition in which the discriminative functions were maximized and the reinforcing functions were minimized (i.e., performance-specific instructions without contingent money) with one in which the reinforcing functions were maximized and the discriminative functions were minimized (i.e., contingent money with no performance-specific instructions). We compared the effects of these two conditions on the acquisition of skills involved in conducting two commonly used preference assessments. Results showed that acquisition of these skills occurred primarily in the condition with performance-specific instruction without contingent money, suggesting that the delivery of performance-specific instructions was critical to skill acquisition, whereas the delivery of contingent money had little effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-77
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

stimulus
money
staff
Seat Belts
performance
instruction
Maintenance
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care
Stimulus
Contingent
Staff
health care

Keywords

  • Behavioral skills training
  • Feedback
  • Organizational behavior management
  • Preference assessments
  • Staff training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments. / Roscoe, Eileen M.; Fisher, Wayne W; Glover, Ashley C.; Volkert, Valerie M.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.03.2006, p. 63-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8059abc03da04eb8b9c6fbe45a968197,
title = "Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments",
abstract = "Performance feedback has facilitated the acquisition and maintenance of a wide range of behaviors (e.g., health-care routines, seat-belt use). Most researchers have attributed the effectiveness of performance feedback to (a) its discriminative functions, (b) its reinforcing functions, or (c) the combination of the two. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the relative contributions of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of performance feedback by comparing a condition in which the discriminative functions were maximized and the reinforcing functions were minimized (i.e., performance-specific instructions without contingent money) with one in which the reinforcing functions were maximized and the discriminative functions were minimized (i.e., contingent money with no performance-specific instructions). We compared the effects of these two conditions on the acquisition of skills involved in conducting two commonly used preference assessments. Results showed that acquisition of these skills occurred primarily in the condition with performance-specific instruction without contingent money, suggesting that the delivery of performance-specific instructions was critical to skill acquisition, whereas the delivery of contingent money had little effect.",
keywords = "Behavioral skills training, Feedback, Organizational behavior management, Preference assessments, Staff training",
author = "Roscoe, {Eileen M.} and Fisher, {Wayne W} and Glover, {Ashley C.} and Volkert, {Valerie M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2006.7-05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "63--77",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the relative effects of feedback and contingent money for staff training of stimulus preference assessments

AU - Roscoe, Eileen M.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W

AU - Glover, Ashley C.

AU - Volkert, Valerie M.

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Performance feedback has facilitated the acquisition and maintenance of a wide range of behaviors (e.g., health-care routines, seat-belt use). Most researchers have attributed the effectiveness of performance feedback to (a) its discriminative functions, (b) its reinforcing functions, or (c) the combination of the two. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the relative contributions of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of performance feedback by comparing a condition in which the discriminative functions were maximized and the reinforcing functions were minimized (i.e., performance-specific instructions without contingent money) with one in which the reinforcing functions were maximized and the discriminative functions were minimized (i.e., contingent money with no performance-specific instructions). We compared the effects of these two conditions on the acquisition of skills involved in conducting two commonly used preference assessments. Results showed that acquisition of these skills occurred primarily in the condition with performance-specific instruction without contingent money, suggesting that the delivery of performance-specific instructions was critical to skill acquisition, whereas the delivery of contingent money had little effect.

AB - Performance feedback has facilitated the acquisition and maintenance of a wide range of behaviors (e.g., health-care routines, seat-belt use). Most researchers have attributed the effectiveness of performance feedback to (a) its discriminative functions, (b) its reinforcing functions, or (c) the combination of the two. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the relative contributions of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of performance feedback by comparing a condition in which the discriminative functions were maximized and the reinforcing functions were minimized (i.e., performance-specific instructions without contingent money) with one in which the reinforcing functions were maximized and the discriminative functions were minimized (i.e., contingent money with no performance-specific instructions). We compared the effects of these two conditions on the acquisition of skills involved in conducting two commonly used preference assessments. Results showed that acquisition of these skills occurred primarily in the condition with performance-specific instruction without contingent money, suggesting that the delivery of performance-specific instructions was critical to skill acquisition, whereas the delivery of contingent money had little effect.

KW - Behavioral skills training

KW - Feedback

KW - Organizational behavior management

KW - Preference assessments

KW - Staff training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746929136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746929136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2006.7-05

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2006.7-05

M3 - Article

C2 - 16602386

AN - SCOPUS:33746929136

VL - 39

SP - 63

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 1

ER -