Abstract

Background. Distractions are recognized as a significant factor affecting performance in safety critical domains. Although operating rooms are generally full of distractions, the effect of distractions on robot-assisted surgical (RAS) performance is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the effect of distractions on RAS performance using both objective and subjective measures. Methods. Fifteen participants performed a knot-tying task using the da Vinci Surgical System and were exposed to 3 distractions: (1) passive distraction entailed listening to noise with a constant heart rate, (2) active distraction included listening to noise and acknowledging a change of random heart rate from 60 to 120 bpm, and (3) interactive distraction consisted of answering math questions. The objective kinematics of the surgical instrument tips were used to evaluate performance. Electromyography (EMG) of the forearm and hand muscles of the participants were collected. The median EMG frequency (EMGfmed) and the EMG envelope (EMGenv) were analyzed. NASA Task Load Index and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery score were used to evaluate the subjective performance. One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to examine the effects of distraction on skills performance. Spearman's correlations were conducted to compare objective and subjective measures. Results. Significant distraction effect was found for all objective kinematics measures (P <.05). There were significant distraction effects for EMG measures (EMGenv, P <.004; EMGfmed, P =.031). Significant distraction effects were also found for subjective measurements. Conclusions. Distraction impairs surgical skills performance and increases muscle work. Understanding how the surgeons cope with distractions is important in developing surgical education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-89
Number of pages12
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Electromyography
Biomechanical Phenomena
Noise
Heart Rate
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Muscles
Operating Rooms
Surgical Instruments
Forearm
Laparoscopy
Analysis of Variance
Hand
Safety
Education

Keywords

  • NASA Task Load Index
  • da Vinci Surgical System
  • electromyography
  • kinematics
  • noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluating robotic surgical skills performance under distractive environment using objective and subjective measures. / Suh, Irene H.; LaGrange, Chad A; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Siu, Joseph Ka-Chun.

In: Surgical Innovation, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 78-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0c3827410f04a66ae9af10919cd3cfc,
title = "Evaluating robotic surgical skills performance under distractive environment using objective and subjective measures",
abstract = "Background. Distractions are recognized as a significant factor affecting performance in safety critical domains. Although operating rooms are generally full of distractions, the effect of distractions on robot-assisted surgical (RAS) performance is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the effect of distractions on RAS performance using both objective and subjective measures. Methods. Fifteen participants performed a knot-tying task using the da Vinci Surgical System and were exposed to 3 distractions: (1) passive distraction entailed listening to noise with a constant heart rate, (2) active distraction included listening to noise and acknowledging a change of random heart rate from 60 to 120 bpm, and (3) interactive distraction consisted of answering math questions. The objective kinematics of the surgical instrument tips were used to evaluate performance. Electromyography (EMG) of the forearm and hand muscles of the participants were collected. The median EMG frequency (EMGfmed) and the EMG envelope (EMGenv) were analyzed. NASA Task Load Index and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery score were used to evaluate the subjective performance. One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to examine the effects of distraction on skills performance. Spearman's correlations were conducted to compare objective and subjective measures. Results. Significant distraction effect was found for all objective kinematics measures (P <.05). There were significant distraction effects for EMG measures (EMGenv, P <.004; EMGfmed, P =.031). Significant distraction effects were also found for subjective measurements. Conclusions. Distraction impairs surgical skills performance and increases muscle work. Understanding how the surgeons cope with distractions is important in developing surgical education.",
keywords = "NASA Task Load Index, da Vinci Surgical System, electromyography, kinematics, noise",
author = "Suh, {Irene H.} and LaGrange, {Chad A} and Dmitry Oleynikov and Siu, {Joseph Ka-Chun}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1553350615596637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "78--89",
journal = "Surgical Innovation",
issn = "1553-3506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating robotic surgical skills performance under distractive environment using objective and subjective measures

AU - Suh, Irene H.

AU - LaGrange, Chad A

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

AU - Siu, Joseph Ka-Chun

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background. Distractions are recognized as a significant factor affecting performance in safety critical domains. Although operating rooms are generally full of distractions, the effect of distractions on robot-assisted surgical (RAS) performance is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the effect of distractions on RAS performance using both objective and subjective measures. Methods. Fifteen participants performed a knot-tying task using the da Vinci Surgical System and were exposed to 3 distractions: (1) passive distraction entailed listening to noise with a constant heart rate, (2) active distraction included listening to noise and acknowledging a change of random heart rate from 60 to 120 bpm, and (3) interactive distraction consisted of answering math questions. The objective kinematics of the surgical instrument tips were used to evaluate performance. Electromyography (EMG) of the forearm and hand muscles of the participants were collected. The median EMG frequency (EMGfmed) and the EMG envelope (EMGenv) were analyzed. NASA Task Load Index and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery score were used to evaluate the subjective performance. One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to examine the effects of distraction on skills performance. Spearman's correlations were conducted to compare objective and subjective measures. Results. Significant distraction effect was found for all objective kinematics measures (P <.05). There were significant distraction effects for EMG measures (EMGenv, P <.004; EMGfmed, P =.031). Significant distraction effects were also found for subjective measurements. Conclusions. Distraction impairs surgical skills performance and increases muscle work. Understanding how the surgeons cope with distractions is important in developing surgical education.

AB - Background. Distractions are recognized as a significant factor affecting performance in safety critical domains. Although operating rooms are generally full of distractions, the effect of distractions on robot-assisted surgical (RAS) performance is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the effect of distractions on RAS performance using both objective and subjective measures. Methods. Fifteen participants performed a knot-tying task using the da Vinci Surgical System and were exposed to 3 distractions: (1) passive distraction entailed listening to noise with a constant heart rate, (2) active distraction included listening to noise and acknowledging a change of random heart rate from 60 to 120 bpm, and (3) interactive distraction consisted of answering math questions. The objective kinematics of the surgical instrument tips were used to evaluate performance. Electromyography (EMG) of the forearm and hand muscles of the participants were collected. The median EMG frequency (EMGfmed) and the EMG envelope (EMGenv) were analyzed. NASA Task Load Index and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery score were used to evaluate the subjective performance. One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to examine the effects of distraction on skills performance. Spearman's correlations were conducted to compare objective and subjective measures. Results. Significant distraction effect was found for all objective kinematics measures (P <.05). There were significant distraction effects for EMG measures (EMGenv, P <.004; EMGfmed, P =.031). Significant distraction effects were also found for subjective measurements. Conclusions. Distraction impairs surgical skills performance and increases muscle work. Understanding how the surgeons cope with distractions is important in developing surgical education.

KW - NASA Task Load Index

KW - da Vinci Surgical System

KW - electromyography

KW - kinematics

KW - noise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952885734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952885734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1553350615596637

DO - 10.1177/1553350615596637

M3 - Article

C2 - 26220676

AN - SCOPUS:84952885734

VL - 23

SP - 78

EP - 89

JO - Surgical Innovation

JF - Surgical Innovation

SN - 1553-3506

IS - 1

ER -