Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization

Jung Leng Foo, Marisol Martinez-Escobar, Bethany Juhnke, Keely Cassidy, Kenneth Hisley, Thom Lobe, Eliot Winer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Visualization of medical data in three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) views is a complex area of research. In many fields 3D views are used to understand the shape of an object, and 2D views are used to understand spatial relationships. It is unclear how 2D/3D views play a role in the medical field. Using 3D views can potentially decrease the learning curve experienced with traditional 2D views by providing a whole representation of the patient's anatomy. However, there are challenges with 3D views compared with 2D. This current study expands on a previous study to evaluate the mental workload associated with both 2D and 3D views. Twenty-five first-year medical students were asked to localize three anatomical structures - gallbladder, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric artery - in either 2D or 3D environments. Accuracy and time were taken as the objective measures for mental workload. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used as a subjective measure for mental workload. Results showed that participants viewing in 3D had higher localization accuracy and a lower subjective measure of mental workload, specifically, the mental demand component of the NASA-TLX. Results from this study may prove useful for designing curricula in anatomy education and improving training procedures for surgeons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Workload
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Anatomy
Superior Mesenteric Artery
Learning Curve
Gallbladder
Medical Students
Abdomen
Curriculum
Education
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization. / Foo, Jung Leng; Martinez-Escobar, Marisol; Juhnke, Bethany; Cassidy, Keely; Hisley, Kenneth; Lobe, Thom; Winer, Eliot.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Foo, Jung Leng ; Martinez-Escobar, Marisol ; Juhnke, Bethany ; Cassidy, Keely ; Hisley, Kenneth ; Lobe, Thom ; Winer, Eliot. / Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 65-70.
@article{173a37bf5ab64825834d55ab93ba94ef,
title = "Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization",
abstract = "Visualization of medical data in three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) views is a complex area of research. In many fields 3D views are used to understand the shape of an object, and 2D views are used to understand spatial relationships. It is unclear how 2D/3D views play a role in the medical field. Using 3D views can potentially decrease the learning curve experienced with traditional 2D views by providing a whole representation of the patient's anatomy. However, there are challenges with 3D views compared with 2D. This current study expands on a previous study to evaluate the mental workload associated with both 2D and 3D views. Twenty-five first-year medical students were asked to localize three anatomical structures - gallbladder, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric artery - in either 2D or 3D environments. Accuracy and time were taken as the objective measures for mental workload. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used as a subjective measure for mental workload. Results showed that participants viewing in 3D had higher localization accuracy and a lower subjective measure of mental workload, specifically, the mental demand component of the NASA-TLX. Results from this study may prove useful for designing curricula in anatomy education and improving training procedures for surgeons.",
author = "Foo, {Jung Leng} and Marisol Martinez-Escobar and Bethany Juhnke and Keely Cassidy and Kenneth Hisley and Thom Lobe and Eliot Winer",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2012.0150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating mental workload of two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization for anatomical structure localization

AU - Foo, Jung Leng

AU - Martinez-Escobar, Marisol

AU - Juhnke, Bethany

AU - Cassidy, Keely

AU - Hisley, Kenneth

AU - Lobe, Thom

AU - Winer, Eliot

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Visualization of medical data in three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) views is a complex area of research. In many fields 3D views are used to understand the shape of an object, and 2D views are used to understand spatial relationships. It is unclear how 2D/3D views play a role in the medical field. Using 3D views can potentially decrease the learning curve experienced with traditional 2D views by providing a whole representation of the patient's anatomy. However, there are challenges with 3D views compared with 2D. This current study expands on a previous study to evaluate the mental workload associated with both 2D and 3D views. Twenty-five first-year medical students were asked to localize three anatomical structures - gallbladder, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric artery - in either 2D or 3D environments. Accuracy and time were taken as the objective measures for mental workload. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used as a subjective measure for mental workload. Results showed that participants viewing in 3D had higher localization accuracy and a lower subjective measure of mental workload, specifically, the mental demand component of the NASA-TLX. Results from this study may prove useful for designing curricula in anatomy education and improving training procedures for surgeons.

AB - Visualization of medical data in three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) views is a complex area of research. In many fields 3D views are used to understand the shape of an object, and 2D views are used to understand spatial relationships. It is unclear how 2D/3D views play a role in the medical field. Using 3D views can potentially decrease the learning curve experienced with traditional 2D views by providing a whole representation of the patient's anatomy. However, there are challenges with 3D views compared with 2D. This current study expands on a previous study to evaluate the mental workload associated with both 2D and 3D views. Twenty-five first-year medical students were asked to localize three anatomical structures - gallbladder, celiac trunk, and superior mesenteric artery - in either 2D or 3D environments. Accuracy and time were taken as the objective measures for mental workload. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used as a subjective measure for mental workload. Results showed that participants viewing in 3D had higher localization accuracy and a lower subjective measure of mental workload, specifically, the mental demand component of the NASA-TLX. Results from this study may prove useful for designing curricula in anatomy education and improving training procedures for surgeons.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873162826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873162826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2012.0150

DO - 10.1089/lap.2012.0150

M3 - Article

C2 - 23101794

AN - SCOPUS:84873162826

VL - 23

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 1

ER -