Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies

Martin Sliwinski, Lesa R Hoffman, Scott M. Hofer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The distinction of between-person age differences from within-person age changes is necessary for understanding aging-related change processes. Although longitudinal studies are required to address issues relating to within-person change, most studies begin using age-heterogeneous samples and conclude using survival-heterogeneous samples. Given the numerous potential confounds associated with age-heterogeneous samples, careful treatment of between-person age differences is essential to obtain the correct inferences regarding within-person age change. The authors demonstrate how failure to differentiate between-person age effects (and by extension, of survival age or other effects producing sample heterogeneity) will lead to uninterpretable inferences regarding within-person change. The authors recommend that convergence of age differences and age changes be formally evaluated whenever possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-60
Number of pages16
JournalResearch in Human Development
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Longitudinal Studies
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies. / Sliwinski, Martin; Hoffman, Lesa R; Hofer, Scott M.

In: Research in Human Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 45-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a4c882c818194c01a91c1769c09b9be2,
title = "Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies",
abstract = "The distinction of between-person age differences from within-person age changes is necessary for understanding aging-related change processes. Although longitudinal studies are required to address issues relating to within-person change, most studies begin using age-heterogeneous samples and conclude using survival-heterogeneous samples. Given the numerous potential confounds associated with age-heterogeneous samples, careful treatment of between-person age differences is essential to obtain the correct inferences regarding within-person age change. The authors demonstrate how failure to differentiate between-person age effects (and by extension, of survival age or other effects producing sample heterogeneity) will lead to uninterpretable inferences regarding within-person change. The authors recommend that convergence of age differences and age changes be formally evaluated whenever possible.",
author = "Martin Sliwinski and Hoffman, {Lesa R} and Hofer, {Scott M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15427600903578169",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "45--60",
journal = "Research in Human Development",
issn = "1542-7609",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating convergence of within-person change and between-person age differences in age-heterogeneous longitudinal studies

AU - Sliwinski, Martin

AU - Hoffman, Lesa R

AU - Hofer, Scott M.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The distinction of between-person age differences from within-person age changes is necessary for understanding aging-related change processes. Although longitudinal studies are required to address issues relating to within-person change, most studies begin using age-heterogeneous samples and conclude using survival-heterogeneous samples. Given the numerous potential confounds associated with age-heterogeneous samples, careful treatment of between-person age differences is essential to obtain the correct inferences regarding within-person age change. The authors demonstrate how failure to differentiate between-person age effects (and by extension, of survival age or other effects producing sample heterogeneity) will lead to uninterpretable inferences regarding within-person change. The authors recommend that convergence of age differences and age changes be formally evaluated whenever possible.

AB - The distinction of between-person age differences from within-person age changes is necessary for understanding aging-related change processes. Although longitudinal studies are required to address issues relating to within-person change, most studies begin using age-heterogeneous samples and conclude using survival-heterogeneous samples. Given the numerous potential confounds associated with age-heterogeneous samples, careful treatment of between-person age differences is essential to obtain the correct inferences regarding within-person age change. The authors demonstrate how failure to differentiate between-person age effects (and by extension, of survival age or other effects producing sample heterogeneity) will lead to uninterpretable inferences regarding within-person change. The authors recommend that convergence of age differences and age changes be formally evaluated whenever possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951213518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951213518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15427600903578169

DO - 10.1080/15427600903578169

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 45

EP - 60

JO - Research in Human Development

JF - Research in Human Development

SN - 1542-7609

IS - 1

ER -