Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis

Gerald Flanagan, Perry S. Binder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Setting: Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center. Methods: In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically. Results: Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a "standard" or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P = .78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P = .98), which provided the best RST estimates. Conclusions: Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1674-1683
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of cataract and refractive surgery
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Laser Therapy
Lasers
Corneal Pachymetry
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Excimer Lasers
Dehydration
Ultrasonics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. / Flanagan, Gerald; Binder, Perry S.

In: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.09.2003, p. 1674-1683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb328492fc014da6b4b4ce38eef20ce5,
title = "Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Setting: Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center. Methods: In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically. Results: Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a {"}standard{"} or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P = .78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P = .98), which provided the best RST estimates. Conclusions: Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.",
author = "Gerald Flanagan and Binder, {Perry S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00705-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1674--1683",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis

AU - Flanagan, Gerald

AU - Binder, Perry S.

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Setting: Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center. Methods: In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically. Results: Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a "standard" or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P = .78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P = .98), which provided the best RST estimates. Conclusions: Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.

AB - Purpose: To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Setting: Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center. Methods: In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically. Results: Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a "standard" or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P = .78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P = .98), which provided the best RST estimates. Conclusions: Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141561843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141561843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00705-3

DO - 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00705-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 14522285

AN - SCOPUS:0141561843

VL - 29

SP - 1674

EP - 1683

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 9

ER -