Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training

Wayne W. Fisher, David E. Kuhn, Rachel H. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional communication training (FCT) is a popular treatment for problem behaviors, but its effectiveness may be compromised when the client emits the target communication response and reinforcement is either delayed or denied. In the current investigation, we trained 2 individuals to emit different communication responses to request (a) the reinforcer for destructive behavior in a given situation (e.g., contingent attention in the attention condition of a functional analysis) and (b) an alternative reinforcer (e.g., toys in the attention condition of a functional analysis). Next, we taught the participants to request each reinforcer in the presence of a different discriminative stimulus (SD). Then, we evaluated the effects of differential reinforcement of communication (DRC) using the functional and alternative reinforcers and correlated SDs, with and without extinction of destructive behavior. During all applications, DRC (in combination with SDs that signaled available reinforcers) rapidly reduced destructive behavior to low levels regardless of whether the functional reinforcer or an alternative reinforcer was available or whether reinforcement for destructive behavior was discontinued (i.e., extinction).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-560
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

reinforcement
Communication
communication
functional analysis
Play and Playthings
toy
stimulus
Communication Training
Functional Communication
Reinforcement
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Extinction
Functional Analysis
Psychological Extinction
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Developmental disabilities
  • Discriminative stimulus
  • Functional analysis
  • Functional communication training
  • Reinforcer substitutability
  • Stimulus control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training. / Fisher, Wayne W.; Kuhn, David E.; Thompson, Rachel H.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 543-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{785052d813d2495797b73752452019e6,
title = "Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training",
abstract = "Functional communication training (FCT) is a popular treatment for problem behaviors, but its effectiveness may be compromised when the client emits the target communication response and reinforcement is either delayed or denied. In the current investigation, we trained 2 individuals to emit different communication responses to request (a) the reinforcer for destructive behavior in a given situation (e.g., contingent attention in the attention condition of a functional analysis) and (b) an alternative reinforcer (e.g., toys in the attention condition of a functional analysis). Next, we taught the participants to request each reinforcer in the presence of a different discriminative stimulus (SD). Then, we evaluated the effects of differential reinforcement of communication (DRC) using the functional and alternative reinforcers and correlated SDs, with and without extinction of destructive behavior. During all applications, DRC (in combination with SDs that signaled available reinforcers) rapidly reduced destructive behavior to low levels regardless of whether the functional reinforcer or an alternative reinforcer was available or whether reinforcement for destructive behavior was discontinued (i.e., extinction).",
keywords = "Autism, Developmental disabilities, Discriminative stimulus, Functional analysis, Functional communication training, Reinforcer substitutability, Stimulus control",
author = "Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Kuhn, {David E.} and Thompson, {Rachel H.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "543--560",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing discriminative control of responding using functional and alternative reinforcers during functional communication training

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Kuhn, David E.

AU - Thompson, Rachel H.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Functional communication training (FCT) is a popular treatment for problem behaviors, but its effectiveness may be compromised when the client emits the target communication response and reinforcement is either delayed or denied. In the current investigation, we trained 2 individuals to emit different communication responses to request (a) the reinforcer for destructive behavior in a given situation (e.g., contingent attention in the attention condition of a functional analysis) and (b) an alternative reinforcer (e.g., toys in the attention condition of a functional analysis). Next, we taught the participants to request each reinforcer in the presence of a different discriminative stimulus (SD). Then, we evaluated the effects of differential reinforcement of communication (DRC) using the functional and alternative reinforcers and correlated SDs, with and without extinction of destructive behavior. During all applications, DRC (in combination with SDs that signaled available reinforcers) rapidly reduced destructive behavior to low levels regardless of whether the functional reinforcer or an alternative reinforcer was available or whether reinforcement for destructive behavior was discontinued (i.e., extinction).

AB - Functional communication training (FCT) is a popular treatment for problem behaviors, but its effectiveness may be compromised when the client emits the target communication response and reinforcement is either delayed or denied. In the current investigation, we trained 2 individuals to emit different communication responses to request (a) the reinforcer for destructive behavior in a given situation (e.g., contingent attention in the attention condition of a functional analysis) and (b) an alternative reinforcer (e.g., toys in the attention condition of a functional analysis). Next, we taught the participants to request each reinforcer in the presence of a different discriminative stimulus (SD). Then, we evaluated the effects of differential reinforcement of communication (DRC) using the functional and alternative reinforcers and correlated SDs, with and without extinction of destructive behavior. During all applications, DRC (in combination with SDs that signaled available reinforcers) rapidly reduced destructive behavior to low levels regardless of whether the functional reinforcer or an alternative reinforcer was available or whether reinforcement for destructive behavior was discontinued (i.e., extinction).

KW - Autism

KW - Developmental disabilities

KW - Discriminative stimulus

KW - Functional analysis

KW - Functional communication training

KW - Reinforcer substitutability

KW - Stimulus control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032240260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032240260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-543

M3 - Article

C2 - 9891393

AN - SCOPUS:0032240260

VL - 31

SP - 543

EP - 560

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 4

ER -