Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides

Heather Brown, Danielle Drummond, Christian I.J. Minter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Springshare’s LibGuide platform has become synonymous with online library pathfinders or research guides and instruction support. However, without oversight of the collection of guides and standards for their creation, unwieldy numbers and lack of uniformity prevail. The McGoogan Library of Medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center created a review process that not only governed the creation and approval of guides, but analyzed the usage and scope of guides that had already been created. This paper will outline the creation of standards and application of a review process to increase the value and relevance of guides.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-374
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Reference Services Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2018

Fingerprint

Libraries
Research
Medicine
medicine
instruction
lack
Values

Keywords

  • LibGuides
  • library guides
  • pathfinders
  • research guides
  • standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides. / Brown, Heather; Drummond, Danielle; Minter, Christian I.J.

In: Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 4, 02.10.2018, p. 367-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Heather ; Drummond, Danielle ; Minter, Christian I.J. / Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides. In: Medical Reference Services Quarterly. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 367-374.
@article{948303e5ef5f4efea89449b840cd5414,
title = "Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides",
abstract = "Springshare’s LibGuide platform has become synonymous with online library pathfinders or research guides and instruction support. However, without oversight of the collection of guides and standards for their creation, unwieldy numbers and lack of uniformity prevail. The McGoogan Library of Medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center created a review process that not only governed the creation and approval of guides, but analyzed the usage and scope of guides that had already been created. This paper will outline the creation of standards and application of a review process to increase the value and relevance of guides.",
keywords = "LibGuides, library guides, pathfinders, research guides, standards",
author = "Heather Brown and Danielle Drummond and Minter, {Christian I.J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02763869.2018.1514901",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "367--374",
journal = "Medical Reference Services Quarterly",
issn = "0276-3869",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing a Review Process to Evaluate Research Guides

AU - Brown, Heather

AU - Drummond, Danielle

AU - Minter, Christian I.J.

PY - 2018/10/2

Y1 - 2018/10/2

N2 - Springshare’s LibGuide platform has become synonymous with online library pathfinders or research guides and instruction support. However, without oversight of the collection of guides and standards for their creation, unwieldy numbers and lack of uniformity prevail. The McGoogan Library of Medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center created a review process that not only governed the creation and approval of guides, but analyzed the usage and scope of guides that had already been created. This paper will outline the creation of standards and application of a review process to increase the value and relevance of guides.

AB - Springshare’s LibGuide platform has become synonymous with online library pathfinders or research guides and instruction support. However, without oversight of the collection of guides and standards for their creation, unwieldy numbers and lack of uniformity prevail. The McGoogan Library of Medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center created a review process that not only governed the creation and approval of guides, but analyzed the usage and scope of guides that had already been created. This paper will outline the creation of standards and application of a review process to increase the value and relevance of guides.

KW - LibGuides

KW - library guides

KW - pathfinders

KW - research guides

KW - standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061143274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061143274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02763869.2018.1514901

DO - 10.1080/02763869.2018.1514901

M3 - Article

C2 - 30722768

AN - SCOPUS:85061143274

VL - 37

SP - 367

EP - 374

JO - Medical Reference Services Quarterly

JF - Medical Reference Services Quarterly

SN - 0276-3869

IS - 4

ER -