Errors associated with utilizing prescribed scapular kinematics to estimate unconstrained, natural upper extremity motion in musculoskeletal modeling

R. Tyler Richardson, Elizabeth A. Rapp, R. Garry Quinton, Kristen F. Nicholson, Brian A. Knarr, Stephanie A. Russo, Jill S. Higginson, James G. Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Musculoskeletal modeling is capable of estimating physiological parameters that cannot be directly measured, however, the validity of the results must be assessed. Several models utilize a scapular rhythm to prescribe kinematics, yet it is unknown how well they replicate natural scapular motion. This study evaluated kinematic errors associated with a model that employs a scapular rhythm using 2 shoulder movements: abduction and forward reach. Two versions of the model were tested: the original MoBL ARMS model that utilizes a scapular rhythm, and a modified MoBL ARMS model that permits unconstrained scapular motion. Model estimates were compared against scapulothoracic kinematics directly measured from motion capture. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic resultant angle errors associated with the rhythm model were greater than 10° for abduction (mean: 16.4°, max: 22.4°) and forward reach (mean: 11.1°, max: 16.5°). Errors generally increased with humerothoracic elevation with all subjects reporting greater than 10° differences at elevations greater than 45°. Errors associated with the unconstrained model were less than 10°. Consequently, use of the original MoBL ARMS model is cautioned for applications requiring precise scapulothoracic kinematics. These findings can help determine which research questions are suitable for investigation with these models and assist in contextualizing model results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-473
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of applied biomechanics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Upper Extremity
Reproducibility of Results
Research

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Model
  • Scapula
  • Scapulothoracic
  • Shoulder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Errors associated with utilizing prescribed scapular kinematics to estimate unconstrained, natural upper extremity motion in musculoskeletal modeling. / Richardson, R. Tyler; Rapp, Elizabeth A.; Quinton, R. Garry; Nicholson, Kristen F.; Knarr, Brian A.; Russo, Stephanie A.; Higginson, Jill S.; Richards, James G.

In: Journal of applied biomechanics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 12.2017, p. 469-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richardson, R. Tyler ; Rapp, Elizabeth A. ; Quinton, R. Garry ; Nicholson, Kristen F. ; Knarr, Brian A. ; Russo, Stephanie A. ; Higginson, Jill S. ; Richards, James G. / Errors associated with utilizing prescribed scapular kinematics to estimate unconstrained, natural upper extremity motion in musculoskeletal modeling. In: Journal of applied biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 469-473.
@article{fd1f3ef81db0411d920d2cf17ada1a02,
title = "Errors associated with utilizing prescribed scapular kinematics to estimate unconstrained, natural upper extremity motion in musculoskeletal modeling",
abstract = "Musculoskeletal modeling is capable of estimating physiological parameters that cannot be directly measured, however, the validity of the results must be assessed. Several models utilize a scapular rhythm to prescribe kinematics, yet it is unknown how well they replicate natural scapular motion. This study evaluated kinematic errors associated with a model that employs a scapular rhythm using 2 shoulder movements: abduction and forward reach. Two versions of the model were tested: the original MoBL ARMS model that utilizes a scapular rhythm, and a modified MoBL ARMS model that permits unconstrained scapular motion. Model estimates were compared against scapulothoracic kinematics directly measured from motion capture. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic resultant angle errors associated with the rhythm model were greater than 10° for abduction (mean: 16.4°, max: 22.4°) and forward reach (mean: 11.1°, max: 16.5°). Errors generally increased with humerothoracic elevation with all subjects reporting greater than 10° differences at elevations greater than 45°. Errors associated with the unconstrained model were less than 10°. Consequently, use of the original MoBL ARMS model is cautioned for applications requiring precise scapulothoracic kinematics. These findings can help determine which research questions are suitable for investigation with these models and assist in contextualizing model results.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Model, Scapula, Scapulothoracic, Shoulder",
author = "Richardson, {R. Tyler} and Rapp, {Elizabeth A.} and Quinton, {R. Garry} and Nicholson, {Kristen F.} and Knarr, {Brian A.} and Russo, {Stephanie A.} and Higginson, {Jill S.} and Richards, {James G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1123/jab.2016-0346",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "469--473",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Errors associated with utilizing prescribed scapular kinematics to estimate unconstrained, natural upper extremity motion in musculoskeletal modeling

AU - Richardson, R. Tyler

AU - Rapp, Elizabeth A.

AU - Quinton, R. Garry

AU - Nicholson, Kristen F.

AU - Knarr, Brian A.

AU - Russo, Stephanie A.

AU - Higginson, Jill S.

AU - Richards, James G.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Musculoskeletal modeling is capable of estimating physiological parameters that cannot be directly measured, however, the validity of the results must be assessed. Several models utilize a scapular rhythm to prescribe kinematics, yet it is unknown how well they replicate natural scapular motion. This study evaluated kinematic errors associated with a model that employs a scapular rhythm using 2 shoulder movements: abduction and forward reach. Two versions of the model were tested: the original MoBL ARMS model that utilizes a scapular rhythm, and a modified MoBL ARMS model that permits unconstrained scapular motion. Model estimates were compared against scapulothoracic kinematics directly measured from motion capture. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic resultant angle errors associated with the rhythm model were greater than 10° for abduction (mean: 16.4°, max: 22.4°) and forward reach (mean: 11.1°, max: 16.5°). Errors generally increased with humerothoracic elevation with all subjects reporting greater than 10° differences at elevations greater than 45°. Errors associated with the unconstrained model were less than 10°. Consequently, use of the original MoBL ARMS model is cautioned for applications requiring precise scapulothoracic kinematics. These findings can help determine which research questions are suitable for investigation with these models and assist in contextualizing model results.

AB - Musculoskeletal modeling is capable of estimating physiological parameters that cannot be directly measured, however, the validity of the results must be assessed. Several models utilize a scapular rhythm to prescribe kinematics, yet it is unknown how well they replicate natural scapular motion. This study evaluated kinematic errors associated with a model that employs a scapular rhythm using 2 shoulder movements: abduction and forward reach. Two versions of the model were tested: the original MoBL ARMS model that utilizes a scapular rhythm, and a modified MoBL ARMS model that permits unconstrained scapular motion. Model estimates were compared against scapulothoracic kinematics directly measured from motion capture. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic resultant angle errors associated with the rhythm model were greater than 10° for abduction (mean: 16.4°, max: 22.4°) and forward reach (mean: 11.1°, max: 16.5°). Errors generally increased with humerothoracic elevation with all subjects reporting greater than 10° differences at elevations greater than 45°. Errors associated with the unconstrained model were less than 10°. Consequently, use of the original MoBL ARMS model is cautioned for applications requiring precise scapulothoracic kinematics. These findings can help determine which research questions are suitable for investigation with these models and assist in contextualizing model results.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Model

KW - Scapula

KW - Scapulothoracic

KW - Shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042722877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042722877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jab.2016-0346

DO - 10.1123/jab.2016-0346

M3 - Article

C2 - 28657855

AN - SCOPUS:85042722877

VL - 33

SP - 469

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 6

ER -