Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle

Presentation and management

Quan Dong Nguyen, Kameran Lashkari, Tatsuo Hirose, Ronald C. Pruett, J. WALLACE McMEEL, Charles L. Schepens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and management of erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber implants that are used in scleral buckling procedures for the treatment of retinal detachment. Methods: The authors identified four patients from their practices during the last 20 years (1978-1998) who had erosion or intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckles that were used to manage retinal detachment. Approximately 4400 scleral buckling procedures were performed during this period. A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients was performed. Factors that influenced management decisions concerning the intruding buckle are emphasized. Results: All four patients had myopia. The interval between placement of the scleral buckle and development of intrusion ranged from 1 to 20 years. The buckles were intrascleral in three cases and episcleral in one. Recurrent detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were indications for surgical intervention in three cases. After the surgical removal of buckling elements, visual acuity stabilized in all patients and the retina remained attached in all cases. Conclusions: Erosion and intrusion of scleral buckle are rare complications of scleral buckling procedures. The intruding buckle may be left intact unless there is significant threat to the integrity of ocular structures, recurrent detachment, or hemorrhage. Manipulation of the encircling band or buckle does not necessarily alter the visual acuity or the status of the retina.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-220
Number of pages7
JournalRetina
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Silicone Elastomers
Scleral Buckling
Retinal Detachment
Visual Acuity
Retina
Vitreous Hemorrhage
Myopia
Medical Records
Hemorrhage
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Buckle/buckling
  • Erosion
  • Implant
  • Intrusion
  • Retinal detachment
  • Rubber
  • Sclera
  • Silicone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Nguyen, Q. D., Lashkari, K., Hirose, T., Pruett, R. C., McMEEL, J. WALLACE., & Schepens, C. L. (2001). Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle: Presentation and management. Retina, 21(3), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003

Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle : Presentation and management. / Nguyen, Quan Dong; Lashkari, Kameran; Hirose, Tatsuo; Pruett, Ronald C.; McMEEL, J. WALLACE; Schepens, Charles L.

In: Retina, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 214-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, QD, Lashkari, K, Hirose, T, Pruett, RC, McMEEL, JWALLACE & Schepens, CL 2001, 'Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle: Presentation and management', Retina, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003
Nguyen QD, Lashkari K, Hirose T, Pruett RC, McMEEL JWALLACE, Schepens CL. Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle: Presentation and management. Retina. 2001 Jan 1;21(3):214-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003
Nguyen, Quan Dong ; Lashkari, Kameran ; Hirose, Tatsuo ; Pruett, Ronald C. ; McMEEL, J. WALLACE ; Schepens, Charles L. / Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle : Presentation and management. In: Retina. 2001 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 214-220.
@article{5595be6637ef4e2284ff29246697c004,
title = "Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle: Presentation and management",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and management of erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber implants that are used in scleral buckling procedures for the treatment of retinal detachment. Methods: The authors identified four patients from their practices during the last 20 years (1978-1998) who had erosion or intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckles that were used to manage retinal detachment. Approximately 4400 scleral buckling procedures were performed during this period. A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients was performed. Factors that influenced management decisions concerning the intruding buckle are emphasized. Results: All four patients had myopia. The interval between placement of the scleral buckle and development of intrusion ranged from 1 to 20 years. The buckles were intrascleral in three cases and episcleral in one. Recurrent detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were indications for surgical intervention in three cases. After the surgical removal of buckling elements, visual acuity stabilized in all patients and the retina remained attached in all cases. Conclusions: Erosion and intrusion of scleral buckle are rare complications of scleral buckling procedures. The intruding buckle may be left intact unless there is significant threat to the integrity of ocular structures, recurrent detachment, or hemorrhage. Manipulation of the encircling band or buckle does not necessarily alter the visual acuity or the status of the retina.",
keywords = "Buckle/buckling, Erosion, Implant, Intrusion, Retinal detachment, Rubber, Sclera, Silicone",
author = "Nguyen, {Quan Dong} and Kameran Lashkari and Tatsuo Hirose and Pruett, {Ronald C.} and McMEEL, {J. WALLACE} and Schepens, {Charles L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "214--220",
journal = "Retina",
issn = "0275-004X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle

T2 - Presentation and management

AU - Nguyen, Quan Dong

AU - Lashkari, Kameran

AU - Hirose, Tatsuo

AU - Pruett, Ronald C.

AU - McMEEL, J. WALLACE

AU - Schepens, Charles L.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and management of erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber implants that are used in scleral buckling procedures for the treatment of retinal detachment. Methods: The authors identified four patients from their practices during the last 20 years (1978-1998) who had erosion or intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckles that were used to manage retinal detachment. Approximately 4400 scleral buckling procedures were performed during this period. A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients was performed. Factors that influenced management decisions concerning the intruding buckle are emphasized. Results: All four patients had myopia. The interval between placement of the scleral buckle and development of intrusion ranged from 1 to 20 years. The buckles were intrascleral in three cases and episcleral in one. Recurrent detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were indications for surgical intervention in three cases. After the surgical removal of buckling elements, visual acuity stabilized in all patients and the retina remained attached in all cases. Conclusions: Erosion and intrusion of scleral buckle are rare complications of scleral buckling procedures. The intruding buckle may be left intact unless there is significant threat to the integrity of ocular structures, recurrent detachment, or hemorrhage. Manipulation of the encircling band or buckle does not necessarily alter the visual acuity or the status of the retina.

AB - Objective: To describe the clinical presentation and management of erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber implants that are used in scleral buckling procedures for the treatment of retinal detachment. Methods: The authors identified four patients from their practices during the last 20 years (1978-1998) who had erosion or intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckles that were used to manage retinal detachment. Approximately 4400 scleral buckling procedures were performed during this period. A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients was performed. Factors that influenced management decisions concerning the intruding buckle are emphasized. Results: All four patients had myopia. The interval between placement of the scleral buckle and development of intrusion ranged from 1 to 20 years. The buckles were intrascleral in three cases and episcleral in one. Recurrent detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were indications for surgical intervention in three cases. After the surgical removal of buckling elements, visual acuity stabilized in all patients and the retina remained attached in all cases. Conclusions: Erosion and intrusion of scleral buckle are rare complications of scleral buckling procedures. The intruding buckle may be left intact unless there is significant threat to the integrity of ocular structures, recurrent detachment, or hemorrhage. Manipulation of the encircling band or buckle does not necessarily alter the visual acuity or the status of the retina.

KW - Buckle/buckling

KW - Erosion

KW - Implant

KW - Intrusion

KW - Retinal detachment

KW - Rubber

KW - Sclera

KW - Silicone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035014292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035014292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00006982-200106000-00003

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 214

EP - 220

JO - Retina

JF - Retina

SN - 0275-004X

IS - 3

ER -