Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons

Priscila Rodrigues Armijo, Chun Kai Huang, Tyson Carlson, Dmitry Oleynikov, Ka Chun Siu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction. Our aim was to determine how self-reported and objectively measured fatigue of upper limb differ between laparoscopic and robotic surgical training environments. Methods. Surgeons at the 2016 SAGES Conference Learning Center and at our institution were enrolled. Two standardized surgical tasks (peg transfer [PT] and needle passing [NP]) were performed twice in each surgical skills practical environments: (1) laparoscopic training-box environment (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery [FLS]) and (2) Mimic dV-trainer (MIMIC). Muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG; Trigno, Delsys, Inc, Natick, MA). Subjective fatigue was self-reported using Piper Fatigue Scale-12. Analysis was done using SPSS v25.0, α =.05. Results. Demographics were similar between FLS (N = 14) and MIMIC (N = 12). For PT, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS of UT (P <.001) and AD (P <.001). Conversely, FLS led to significant decreased muscle fatigue in UT (P =.015). For NP, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS for UT (P =.034) and AD (P =.031), but FLS induced more muscle fatigue for AD (P =.004). There was significant decrease in self-reported fatigue after performing FLS tasks (P =.030) but not after MIMIC (P =.663). Conclusion. Our results showed that practice with MIMIC resulted in greater activation of shoulder muscles, while FLS caused more significant muscle fatigue in the same muscles. This could be due to ergonomic disadvantages and nonoptimal ergonomic settings. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal ergonomics and its impact on fatigue and muscle activation during use of both the FLS and MIMIC training systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgical Innovation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Robotics
Laparoscopy
Fatigue
Muscle Fatigue
Superficial Back Muscles
Muscles
Needles
Piper
Electromyography
Surgeons
Upper Extremity
Demography
Learning

Keywords

  • ergonomics
  • human factors study
  • simulation
  • surgical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons. / Rodrigues Armijo, Priscila; Huang, Chun Kai; Carlson, Tyson; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Siu, Ka Chun.

In: Surgical Innovation, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc19856019a24028b248153f61d0c0d7,
title = "Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons",
abstract = "Introduction. Our aim was to determine how self-reported and objectively measured fatigue of upper limb differ between laparoscopic and robotic surgical training environments. Methods. Surgeons at the 2016 SAGES Conference Learning Center and at our institution were enrolled. Two standardized surgical tasks (peg transfer [PT] and needle passing [NP]) were performed twice in each surgical skills practical environments: (1) laparoscopic training-box environment (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery [FLS]) and (2) Mimic dV-trainer (MIMIC). Muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG; Trigno, Delsys, Inc, Natick, MA). Subjective fatigue was self-reported using Piper Fatigue Scale-12. Analysis was done using SPSS v25.0, α =.05. Results. Demographics were similar between FLS (N = 14) and MIMIC (N = 12). For PT, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS of UT (P <.001) and AD (P <.001). Conversely, FLS led to significant decreased muscle fatigue in UT (P =.015). For NP, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS for UT (P =.034) and AD (P =.031), but FLS induced more muscle fatigue for AD (P =.004). There was significant decrease in self-reported fatigue after performing FLS tasks (P =.030) but not after MIMIC (P =.663). Conclusion. Our results showed that practice with MIMIC resulted in greater activation of shoulder muscles, while FLS caused more significant muscle fatigue in the same muscles. This could be due to ergonomic disadvantages and nonoptimal ergonomic settings. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal ergonomics and its impact on fatigue and muscle activation during use of both the FLS and MIMIC training systems.",
keywords = "ergonomics, human factors study, simulation, surgical education",
author = "{Rodrigues Armijo}, Priscila and Huang, {Chun Kai} and Tyson Carlson and Dmitry Oleynikov and Siu, {Ka Chun}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1553350619887861",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Surgical Innovation",
issn = "1553-3506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ergonomics Analysis for Subjective and Objective Fatigue Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgical Skills Practice Among Surgeons

AU - Rodrigues Armijo, Priscila

AU - Huang, Chun Kai

AU - Carlson, Tyson

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

AU - Siu, Ka Chun

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction. Our aim was to determine how self-reported and objectively measured fatigue of upper limb differ between laparoscopic and robotic surgical training environments. Methods. Surgeons at the 2016 SAGES Conference Learning Center and at our institution were enrolled. Two standardized surgical tasks (peg transfer [PT] and needle passing [NP]) were performed twice in each surgical skills practical environments: (1) laparoscopic training-box environment (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery [FLS]) and (2) Mimic dV-trainer (MIMIC). Muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG; Trigno, Delsys, Inc, Natick, MA). Subjective fatigue was self-reported using Piper Fatigue Scale-12. Analysis was done using SPSS v25.0, α =.05. Results. Demographics were similar between FLS (N = 14) and MIMIC (N = 12). For PT, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS of UT (P <.001) and AD (P <.001). Conversely, FLS led to significant decreased muscle fatigue in UT (P =.015). For NP, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS for UT (P =.034) and AD (P =.031), but FLS induced more muscle fatigue for AD (P =.004). There was significant decrease in self-reported fatigue after performing FLS tasks (P =.030) but not after MIMIC (P =.663). Conclusion. Our results showed that practice with MIMIC resulted in greater activation of shoulder muscles, while FLS caused more significant muscle fatigue in the same muscles. This could be due to ergonomic disadvantages and nonoptimal ergonomic settings. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal ergonomics and its impact on fatigue and muscle activation during use of both the FLS and MIMIC training systems.

AB - Introduction. Our aim was to determine how self-reported and objectively measured fatigue of upper limb differ between laparoscopic and robotic surgical training environments. Methods. Surgeons at the 2016 SAGES Conference Learning Center and at our institution were enrolled. Two standardized surgical tasks (peg transfer [PT] and needle passing [NP]) were performed twice in each surgical skills practical environments: (1) laparoscopic training-box environment (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery [FLS]) and (2) Mimic dV-trainer (MIMIC). Muscle activation of upper trapezius (UT), anterior deltoid (AD), flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG; Trigno, Delsys, Inc, Natick, MA). Subjective fatigue was self-reported using Piper Fatigue Scale-12. Analysis was done using SPSS v25.0, α =.05. Results. Demographics were similar between FLS (N = 14) and MIMIC (N = 12). For PT, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS of UT (P <.001) and AD (P <.001). Conversely, FLS led to significant decreased muscle fatigue in UT (P =.015). For NP, MIMIC had a significant increase in EMGRMS for UT (P =.034) and AD (P =.031), but FLS induced more muscle fatigue for AD (P =.004). There was significant decrease in self-reported fatigue after performing FLS tasks (P =.030) but not after MIMIC (P =.663). Conclusion. Our results showed that practice with MIMIC resulted in greater activation of shoulder muscles, while FLS caused more significant muscle fatigue in the same muscles. This could be due to ergonomic disadvantages and nonoptimal ergonomic settings. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal ergonomics and its impact on fatigue and muscle activation during use of both the FLS and MIMIC training systems.

KW - ergonomics

KW - human factors study

KW - simulation

KW - surgical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076003369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076003369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1553350619887861

DO - 10.1177/1553350619887861

M3 - Article

C2 - 31771411

AN - SCOPUS:85076003369

JO - Surgical Innovation

JF - Surgical Innovation

SN - 1553-3506

ER -