Equity in neighbourhood walkability? A comparative analysis of three large U.S. cities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the spatial and statistical relationships between social vulnerability (SV) and neighbourhood walkability across three large U.S. cities with different urban typologies and development patterns: Charlotte, NC (a low-density, fast-growing “Sunbelt” city); Pittsburgh, PA (a moderate density, shrinking “Rust Belt” city); and Portland, OR (a progressive West Coast city known for its sprawl-containment policies). Binary logistic regression, independent-samples t-tests, and mapping techniques are employed to determine whether neighbourhoods with high SV (i.e. older populations, higher poverty rates, more service occupations, lower educational attainment, and a higher proportion of minorities) are as likely as those with low SV to exhibit a high degree of walkability. The publically available Walk Score® metric, based on proximity to amenities, street network connectivity, and density, was used as a proxy for neighbourhood walkability. The results indicate significant variability among cities, with Charlotte exhibiting the greatest potential for inequitable access to walkable urban environments and the most prominent concentration of “walk-vulnerable” block groups (BGs) with high SV and low walkability. Both Portland and Pittsburgh exhibited more equitable access when comparing BGs with high and low SV; however, they each presented unique spatial patterns, visualised using a series of maps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)859-879
Number of pages21
JournalLocal Environment
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2017

Fingerprint

equity
vulnerability
containment policy
educational attainment
rust disease
amenity
containment
typology
occupation
connectivity
logistics
poverty
Group
analysis
city
minority
regression
coast

Keywords

  • Walkability
  • environmental justice
  • equity walkability
  • neighbourhood walkability
  • social vulnerability
  • walk score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Equity in neighbourhood walkability? A comparative analysis of three large U.S. cities. / Bereitschaft, Bradley.

In: Local Environment, Vol. 22, No. 7, 03.07.2017, p. 859-879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{722f95dc6e124ca4b0c8adf5a8f970e6,
title = "Equity in neighbourhood walkability? A comparative analysis of three large U.S. cities",
abstract = "This study examines the spatial and statistical relationships between social vulnerability (SV) and neighbourhood walkability across three large U.S. cities with different urban typologies and development patterns: Charlotte, NC (a low-density, fast-growing “Sunbelt” city); Pittsburgh, PA (a moderate density, shrinking “Rust Belt” city); and Portland, OR (a progressive West Coast city known for its sprawl-containment policies). Binary logistic regression, independent-samples t-tests, and mapping techniques are employed to determine whether neighbourhoods with high SV (i.e. older populations, higher poverty rates, more service occupations, lower educational attainment, and a higher proportion of minorities) are as likely as those with low SV to exhibit a high degree of walkability. The publically available Walk Score{\circledR} metric, based on proximity to amenities, street network connectivity, and density, was used as a proxy for neighbourhood walkability. The results indicate significant variability among cities, with Charlotte exhibiting the greatest potential for inequitable access to walkable urban environments and the most prominent concentration of “walk-vulnerable” block groups (BGs) with high SV and low walkability. Both Portland and Pittsburgh exhibited more equitable access when comparing BGs with high and low SV; however, they each presented unique spatial patterns, visualised using a series of maps.",
keywords = "Walkability, environmental justice, equity walkability, neighbourhood walkability, social vulnerability, walk score",
author = "Bradley Bereitschaft",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13549839.2017.1297390",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "859--879",
journal = "Local Environment",
issn = "1354-9839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity in neighbourhood walkability? A comparative analysis of three large U.S. cities

AU - Bereitschaft, Bradley

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - This study examines the spatial and statistical relationships between social vulnerability (SV) and neighbourhood walkability across three large U.S. cities with different urban typologies and development patterns: Charlotte, NC (a low-density, fast-growing “Sunbelt” city); Pittsburgh, PA (a moderate density, shrinking “Rust Belt” city); and Portland, OR (a progressive West Coast city known for its sprawl-containment policies). Binary logistic regression, independent-samples t-tests, and mapping techniques are employed to determine whether neighbourhoods with high SV (i.e. older populations, higher poverty rates, more service occupations, lower educational attainment, and a higher proportion of minorities) are as likely as those with low SV to exhibit a high degree of walkability. The publically available Walk Score® metric, based on proximity to amenities, street network connectivity, and density, was used as a proxy for neighbourhood walkability. The results indicate significant variability among cities, with Charlotte exhibiting the greatest potential for inequitable access to walkable urban environments and the most prominent concentration of “walk-vulnerable” block groups (BGs) with high SV and low walkability. Both Portland and Pittsburgh exhibited more equitable access when comparing BGs with high and low SV; however, they each presented unique spatial patterns, visualised using a series of maps.

AB - This study examines the spatial and statistical relationships between social vulnerability (SV) and neighbourhood walkability across three large U.S. cities with different urban typologies and development patterns: Charlotte, NC (a low-density, fast-growing “Sunbelt” city); Pittsburgh, PA (a moderate density, shrinking “Rust Belt” city); and Portland, OR (a progressive West Coast city known for its sprawl-containment policies). Binary logistic regression, independent-samples t-tests, and mapping techniques are employed to determine whether neighbourhoods with high SV (i.e. older populations, higher poverty rates, more service occupations, lower educational attainment, and a higher proportion of minorities) are as likely as those with low SV to exhibit a high degree of walkability. The publically available Walk Score® metric, based on proximity to amenities, street network connectivity, and density, was used as a proxy for neighbourhood walkability. The results indicate significant variability among cities, with Charlotte exhibiting the greatest potential for inequitable access to walkable urban environments and the most prominent concentration of “walk-vulnerable” block groups (BGs) with high SV and low walkability. Both Portland and Pittsburgh exhibited more equitable access when comparing BGs with high and low SV; however, they each presented unique spatial patterns, visualised using a series of maps.

KW - Walkability

KW - environmental justice

KW - equity walkability

KW - neighbourhood walkability

KW - social vulnerability

KW - walk score

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014425991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014425991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13549839.2017.1297390

DO - 10.1080/13549839.2017.1297390

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014425991

VL - 22

SP - 859

EP - 879

JO - Local Environment

JF - Local Environment

SN - 1354-9839

IS - 7

ER -