Equity in microscale urban design and walkability: A photographic survey of six Pittsburgh streetscapes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores inequity in neighborhood walkability at the micro-scale level by qualitatively examining six streetscapes in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A photographic survey is used to highlight differences in the quality and design of the built environment among pairs of streetscapes with high or low social vulnerability but approximately equal quantitative Walk Scores®. The survey revealed discernable differences in the quality and maintenance of the built environment among those in more and less disadvantaged neighborhoods. This was true of several characteristics expected to affect walkability, including enclosure, transparency, complexity, and tidiness. Streetscapes in neighborhoods with high social vulnerability exhibited less contiguous street walls, fewer windows and less transparent storefronts, less well maintained infrastructure, fewer street cafés, and overall less complexity than those in neighborhoods with low social vulnerability. Implications for planning and policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1233
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 13 2017

Fingerprint

urban design
equity
vulnerability
Enclosures
Transparency
Planning
transparency
infrastructure
planning
built environment

Keywords

  • Environmental justice
  • Equity
  • Social vulnerability
  • Streetscapes
  • Walk score
  • Walkability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{e31fd9c6443a4cb6baeb948e1e0b1465,
title = "Equity in microscale urban design and walkability: A photographic survey of six Pittsburgh streetscapes",
abstract = "This paper explores inequity in neighborhood walkability at the micro-scale level by qualitatively examining six streetscapes in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A photographic survey is used to highlight differences in the quality and design of the built environment among pairs of streetscapes with high or low social vulnerability but approximately equal quantitative Walk Scores{\circledR}. The survey revealed discernable differences in the quality and maintenance of the built environment among those in more and less disadvantaged neighborhoods. This was true of several characteristics expected to affect walkability, including enclosure, transparency, complexity, and tidiness. Streetscapes in neighborhoods with high social vulnerability exhibited less contiguous street walls, fewer windows and less transparent storefronts, less well maintained infrastructure, fewer street caf{\'e}s, and overall less complexity than those in neighborhoods with low social vulnerability. Implications for planning and policy are discussed.",
keywords = "Environmental justice, Equity, Social vulnerability, Streetscapes, Walk score, Walkability",
author = "Bradley Bereitschaft",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/su9071233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity in microscale urban design and walkability

T2 - A photographic survey of six Pittsburgh streetscapes

AU - Bereitschaft, Bradley

PY - 2017/7/13

Y1 - 2017/7/13

N2 - This paper explores inequity in neighborhood walkability at the micro-scale level by qualitatively examining six streetscapes in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A photographic survey is used to highlight differences in the quality and design of the built environment among pairs of streetscapes with high or low social vulnerability but approximately equal quantitative Walk Scores®. The survey revealed discernable differences in the quality and maintenance of the built environment among those in more and less disadvantaged neighborhoods. This was true of several characteristics expected to affect walkability, including enclosure, transparency, complexity, and tidiness. Streetscapes in neighborhoods with high social vulnerability exhibited less contiguous street walls, fewer windows and less transparent storefronts, less well maintained infrastructure, fewer street cafés, and overall less complexity than those in neighborhoods with low social vulnerability. Implications for planning and policy are discussed.

AB - This paper explores inequity in neighborhood walkability at the micro-scale level by qualitatively examining six streetscapes in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A photographic survey is used to highlight differences in the quality and design of the built environment among pairs of streetscapes with high or low social vulnerability but approximately equal quantitative Walk Scores®. The survey revealed discernable differences in the quality and maintenance of the built environment among those in more and less disadvantaged neighborhoods. This was true of several characteristics expected to affect walkability, including enclosure, transparency, complexity, and tidiness. Streetscapes in neighborhoods with high social vulnerability exhibited less contiguous street walls, fewer windows and less transparent storefronts, less well maintained infrastructure, fewer street cafés, and overall less complexity than those in neighborhoods with low social vulnerability. Implications for planning and policy are discussed.

KW - Environmental justice

KW - Equity

KW - Social vulnerability

KW - Streetscapes

KW - Walk score

KW - Walkability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023778138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023778138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su9071233

DO - 10.3390/su9071233

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023778138

VL - 9

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 7

M1 - 1233

ER -