Epidemiology of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection and possible reasons for heterogeneity

Abraham Degarege, Berhanu Erko

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the impact of helminth infections on clinical malaria is useful for designing effective malaria control strategies. Plenty of epidemiological studies have been conducted to unravel the nature of interactions between Plasmodium and helminth infection. Careful broad summarization of the existing literature suggests that Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infections may increase the risk of clinical malaria and associated morbidities, but Trichuris trichiura infection is not associated with the occurrence of clinical malaria and related outcomes. However, findings about effect of Ascaris lumbricoides and Schistosoma haematobium infection on clinical malaria are contradictory. Furthermore, the nature of relationship of helminth infection with severe malaria has also not been determined with certainty. This review summarizes the findings of epidemiological studies of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection, placing greater emphasis on the impact of the coinfection on malaria. Possible reasons for the heterogeneity of the findings on malaria and helminth coinfections are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3083568
JournalBioMed research international
Volume2016
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Malaria control
Epidemiology
Plasmodium
Helminths
Coinfection
Malaria
Infection
Epidemiologic Studies
Hookworm Infections
Schistosoma haematobium
Ascaris lumbricoides
Trichuris
Schistosomiasis mansoni

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)

Cite this

Epidemiology of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection and possible reasons for heterogeneity. / Degarege, Abraham; Erko, Berhanu.

In: BioMed research international, Vol. 2016, 3083568, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{562d47c2447f48459cfd7a6c35a5ce15,
title = "Epidemiology of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection and possible reasons for heterogeneity",
abstract = "Understanding the impact of helminth infections on clinical malaria is useful for designing effective malaria control strategies. Plenty of epidemiological studies have been conducted to unravel the nature of interactions between Plasmodium and helminth infection. Careful broad summarization of the existing literature suggests that Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infections may increase the risk of clinical malaria and associated morbidities, but Trichuris trichiura infection is not associated with the occurrence of clinical malaria and related outcomes. However, findings about effect of Ascaris lumbricoides and Schistosoma haematobium infection on clinical malaria are contradictory. Furthermore, the nature of relationship of helminth infection with severe malaria has also not been determined with certainty. This review summarizes the findings of epidemiological studies of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection, placing greater emphasis on the impact of the coinfection on malaria. Possible reasons for the heterogeneity of the findings on malaria and helminth coinfections are also discussed.",
author = "Abraham Degarege and Berhanu Erko",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2016/3083568",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2016",
journal = "BioMed Research International",
issn = "2314-6133",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiology of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection and possible reasons for heterogeneity

AU - Degarege, Abraham

AU - Erko, Berhanu

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Understanding the impact of helminth infections on clinical malaria is useful for designing effective malaria control strategies. Plenty of epidemiological studies have been conducted to unravel the nature of interactions between Plasmodium and helminth infection. Careful broad summarization of the existing literature suggests that Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infections may increase the risk of clinical malaria and associated morbidities, but Trichuris trichiura infection is not associated with the occurrence of clinical malaria and related outcomes. However, findings about effect of Ascaris lumbricoides and Schistosoma haematobium infection on clinical malaria are contradictory. Furthermore, the nature of relationship of helminth infection with severe malaria has also not been determined with certainty. This review summarizes the findings of epidemiological studies of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection, placing greater emphasis on the impact of the coinfection on malaria. Possible reasons for the heterogeneity of the findings on malaria and helminth coinfections are also discussed.

AB - Understanding the impact of helminth infections on clinical malaria is useful for designing effective malaria control strategies. Plenty of epidemiological studies have been conducted to unravel the nature of interactions between Plasmodium and helminth infection. Careful broad summarization of the existing literature suggests that Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infections may increase the risk of clinical malaria and associated morbidities, but Trichuris trichiura infection is not associated with the occurrence of clinical malaria and related outcomes. However, findings about effect of Ascaris lumbricoides and Schistosoma haematobium infection on clinical malaria are contradictory. Furthermore, the nature of relationship of helminth infection with severe malaria has also not been determined with certainty. This review summarizes the findings of epidemiological studies of Plasmodium and helminth coinfection, placing greater emphasis on the impact of the coinfection on malaria. Possible reasons for the heterogeneity of the findings on malaria and helminth coinfections are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964818767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964818767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2016/3083568

DO - 10.1155/2016/3083568

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27092310

AN - SCOPUS:84964818767

VL - 2016

JO - BioMed Research International

JF - BioMed Research International

SN - 2314-6133

M1 - 3083568

ER -