Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior

Sarah L. Mullane, Sarah A. Rydell, Miranda L. Larouche, Meynard John L. Toledo, Linda H. Feltes, Brenna Vuong, Noe C. Crespo, Glenn A. Gaesser, Paul A Estabrooks, Mark A. Pereira, Matthew P. Buman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: To review enrollment strategies, participation barriers, and program reach of a large, 2-year workplace intervention targeting sedentary behavior. Approach: Cross-sectional, retrospective review. Setting: Twenty-four worksites balanced across academic, industry, and government sectors in Minneapolis/Saint Paul (Minnesota) and Phoenix (Arizona) regions. Participants: Full-time (≥30+ h/wk), sedentary office workers. Methods: Reach was calculated as the proportion of eligible employees who enrolled in the intervention ([N enrolled/(proportion of eligible employees × N total employees)] × 100). Mean (1 standard deviation) and median worksite sizes were calculated at each enrollment step. Participation barriers and modifications were recorded by the research team. A survey was sent to a subset of nonparticipants (N = 57), and thematic analyses were conducted to examine reasons for nonparticipation, positive impacts, and negative experiences. Results: Employer reach was 65% (56 worksites invited to participate; 66% eligible of 56 responses; 24 enrolled). Employee reach was 58% (1317 invited to participate, 83% eligible of 906 responses; 632 enrolled). Postrandomization, on average, 59% (15%) of the worksites participated. Eighteen modifications were developed to overcome participant-, context-, and research-related participation barriers. Conclusion: A high proportion of worksites and employees approached to participate in a sedentary behavior reduction intervention engaged in the study. Interventions that provide flexible enrollment, graded participant engagement options, and adopt a participant-centered approach may facilitate workplace intervention success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-236
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Workplace
workplace
employee
participation
Saints
employer
Research
worker
Industry
industry
experience

Keywords

  • employee engagement
  • participation barriers
  • reach
  • sedentary behavior
  • workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Mullane, S. L., Rydell, S. A., Larouche, M. L., Toledo, M. J. L., Feltes, L. H., Vuong, B., ... Buman, M. P. (2019). Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(2), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118784228

Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior. / Mullane, Sarah L.; Rydell, Sarah A.; Larouche, Miranda L.; Toledo, Meynard John L.; Feltes, Linda H.; Vuong, Brenna; Crespo, Noe C.; Gaesser, Glenn A.; Estabrooks, Paul A; Pereira, Mark A.; Buman, Matthew P.

In: American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 225-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Mullane, SL, Rydell, SA, Larouche, ML, Toledo, MJL, Feltes, LH, Vuong, B, Crespo, NC, Gaesser, GA, Estabrooks, PA, Pereira, MA & Buman, MP 2019, 'Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior', American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118784228
Mullane, Sarah L. ; Rydell, Sarah A. ; Larouche, Miranda L. ; Toledo, Meynard John L. ; Feltes, Linda H. ; Vuong, Brenna ; Crespo, Noe C. ; Gaesser, Glenn A. ; Estabrooks, Paul A ; Pereira, Mark A. ; Buman, Matthew P. / Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior. In: American Journal of Health Promotion. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 225-236.
@article{a76b356a2e87439da0dc072ff26f92eb,
title = "Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior",
abstract = "Purpose: To review enrollment strategies, participation barriers, and program reach of a large, 2-year workplace intervention targeting sedentary behavior. Approach: Cross-sectional, retrospective review. Setting: Twenty-four worksites balanced across academic, industry, and government sectors in Minneapolis/Saint Paul (Minnesota) and Phoenix (Arizona) regions. Participants: Full-time (≥30+ h/wk), sedentary office workers. Methods: Reach was calculated as the proportion of eligible employees who enrolled in the intervention ([N enrolled/(proportion of eligible employees × N total employees)] × 100). Mean (1 standard deviation) and median worksite sizes were calculated at each enrollment step. Participation barriers and modifications were recorded by the research team. A survey was sent to a subset of nonparticipants (N = 57), and thematic analyses were conducted to examine reasons for nonparticipation, positive impacts, and negative experiences. Results: Employer reach was 65{\%} (56 worksites invited to participate; 66{\%} eligible of 56 responses; 24 enrolled). Employee reach was 58{\%} (1317 invited to participate, 83{\%} eligible of 906 responses; 632 enrolled). Postrandomization, on average, 59{\%} (15{\%}) of the worksites participated. Eighteen modifications were developed to overcome participant-, context-, and research-related participation barriers. Conclusion: A high proportion of worksites and employees approached to participate in a sedentary behavior reduction intervention engaged in the study. Interventions that provide flexible enrollment, graded participant engagement options, and adopt a participant-centered approach may facilitate workplace intervention success.",
keywords = "employee engagement, participation barriers, reach, sedentary behavior, workplace",
author = "Mullane, {Sarah L.} and Rydell, {Sarah A.} and Larouche, {Miranda L.} and Toledo, {Meynard John L.} and Feltes, {Linda H.} and Brenna Vuong and Crespo, {Noe C.} and Gaesser, {Glenn A.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A} and Pereira, {Mark A.} and Buman, {Matthew P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0890117118784228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "225--236",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enrollment Strategies, Barriers to Participation, and Reach of a Workplace Intervention Targeting Sedentary Behavior

AU - Mullane, Sarah L.

AU - Rydell, Sarah A.

AU - Larouche, Miranda L.

AU - Toledo, Meynard John L.

AU - Feltes, Linda H.

AU - Vuong, Brenna

AU - Crespo, Noe C.

AU - Gaesser, Glenn A.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A

AU - Pereira, Mark A.

AU - Buman, Matthew P.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Purpose: To review enrollment strategies, participation barriers, and program reach of a large, 2-year workplace intervention targeting sedentary behavior. Approach: Cross-sectional, retrospective review. Setting: Twenty-four worksites balanced across academic, industry, and government sectors in Minneapolis/Saint Paul (Minnesota) and Phoenix (Arizona) regions. Participants: Full-time (≥30+ h/wk), sedentary office workers. Methods: Reach was calculated as the proportion of eligible employees who enrolled in the intervention ([N enrolled/(proportion of eligible employees × N total employees)] × 100). Mean (1 standard deviation) and median worksite sizes were calculated at each enrollment step. Participation barriers and modifications were recorded by the research team. A survey was sent to a subset of nonparticipants (N = 57), and thematic analyses were conducted to examine reasons for nonparticipation, positive impacts, and negative experiences. Results: Employer reach was 65% (56 worksites invited to participate; 66% eligible of 56 responses; 24 enrolled). Employee reach was 58% (1317 invited to participate, 83% eligible of 906 responses; 632 enrolled). Postrandomization, on average, 59% (15%) of the worksites participated. Eighteen modifications were developed to overcome participant-, context-, and research-related participation barriers. Conclusion: A high proportion of worksites and employees approached to participate in a sedentary behavior reduction intervention engaged in the study. Interventions that provide flexible enrollment, graded participant engagement options, and adopt a participant-centered approach may facilitate workplace intervention success.

AB - Purpose: To review enrollment strategies, participation barriers, and program reach of a large, 2-year workplace intervention targeting sedentary behavior. Approach: Cross-sectional, retrospective review. Setting: Twenty-four worksites balanced across academic, industry, and government sectors in Minneapolis/Saint Paul (Minnesota) and Phoenix (Arizona) regions. Participants: Full-time (≥30+ h/wk), sedentary office workers. Methods: Reach was calculated as the proportion of eligible employees who enrolled in the intervention ([N enrolled/(proportion of eligible employees × N total employees)] × 100). Mean (1 standard deviation) and median worksite sizes were calculated at each enrollment step. Participation barriers and modifications were recorded by the research team. A survey was sent to a subset of nonparticipants (N = 57), and thematic analyses were conducted to examine reasons for nonparticipation, positive impacts, and negative experiences. Results: Employer reach was 65% (56 worksites invited to participate; 66% eligible of 56 responses; 24 enrolled). Employee reach was 58% (1317 invited to participate, 83% eligible of 906 responses; 632 enrolled). Postrandomization, on average, 59% (15%) of the worksites participated. Eighteen modifications were developed to overcome participant-, context-, and research-related participation barriers. Conclusion: A high proportion of worksites and employees approached to participate in a sedentary behavior reduction intervention engaged in the study. Interventions that provide flexible enrollment, graded participant engagement options, and adopt a participant-centered approach may facilitate workplace intervention success.

KW - employee engagement

KW - participation barriers

KW - reach

KW - sedentary behavior

KW - workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049683248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049683248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0890117118784228

DO - 10.1177/0890117118784228

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

SP - 225

EP - 236

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

IS - 2

ER -