Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography

Jaap Stoker, Shahid Hussain, Johan S. Laméris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: A major limitation of anal endosonography is the poor inherent contrast, which is the cause of the cumbersome identification of the longitudinal layer and external sphincter. Endoanal MRI was introduced to overcome this problem. The normal anatomy, perianal fistulas and sphincter defects as visualized by endoanal MR1 as compared to endoanal sonography are discussed. Material and methods: Endoanal sonography was performed with an 18-mm diameter 7-MHz endoanal probe. For endoanal MRI a 19-mm diameter endoanal receiver coil was used at O 5 T. Volunteers and patients with anal fistula or fecal incontinence were examined with both techniques. Results: Endoanal MRI demonstrates the internal sphincter but also the longitudinal layer and external sphincter in great detail. The external sphincter is the lower outer part of the sphincter, while the puborectal muscle is the upper outer part of the sphincter which is connected to the levator ani muscle. External sphincter defects are more often identified and better delineated with MRI. Endoanal MRI is superior in the identification and classification of perianal fistulas. Conclusion: Endoanal MRI is an important new diagnostic tool in anal imaging. The anal sphincter anatomy and pathology are excellently demonstrated. Endoanal MRI is superior to endoanal sonography, especially in the identification of external sphincter defects and in the classification of tracks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)738-741
Number of pages4
JournalRadiologia Medica
Volume92
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 1996

Fingerprint

Endosonography
Ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Anal Canal
Fistula
Anatomy
Rectal Fistula
Muscles
Fecal Incontinence
Volunteers
Pathology

Keywords

  • Anus, endoanal MRI
  • Anus, endoanal sonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Stoker, J., Hussain, S., & Laméris, J. S. (1996). Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography. Radiologia Medica, 92(6), 738-741.

Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography. / Stoker, Jaap; Hussain, Shahid; Laméris, Johan S.

In: Radiologia Medica, Vol. 92, No. 6, 01.12.1996, p. 738-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stoker, J, Hussain, S & Laméris, JS 1996, 'Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography', Radiologia Medica, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 738-741.
Stoker J, Hussain S, Laméris JS. Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography. Radiologia Medica. 1996 Dec 1;92(6):738-741.
Stoker, Jaap ; Hussain, Shahid ; Laméris, Johan S. / Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography. In: Radiologia Medica. 1996 ; Vol. 92, No. 6. pp. 738-741.
@article{64a95025114749b392a7bb73cb905c8e,
title = "Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography",
abstract = "Introduction: A major limitation of anal endosonography is the poor inherent contrast, which is the cause of the cumbersome identification of the longitudinal layer and external sphincter. Endoanal MRI was introduced to overcome this problem. The normal anatomy, perianal fistulas and sphincter defects as visualized by endoanal MR1 as compared to endoanal sonography are discussed. Material and methods: Endoanal sonography was performed with an 18-mm diameter 7-MHz endoanal probe. For endoanal MRI a 19-mm diameter endoanal receiver coil was used at O 5 T. Volunteers and patients with anal fistula or fecal incontinence were examined with both techniques. Results: Endoanal MRI demonstrates the internal sphincter but also the longitudinal layer and external sphincter in great detail. The external sphincter is the lower outer part of the sphincter, while the puborectal muscle is the upper outer part of the sphincter which is connected to the levator ani muscle. External sphincter defects are more often identified and better delineated with MRI. Endoanal MRI is superior in the identification and classification of perianal fistulas. Conclusion: Endoanal MRI is an important new diagnostic tool in anal imaging. The anal sphincter anatomy and pathology are excellently demonstrated. Endoanal MRI is superior to endoanal sonography, especially in the identification of external sphincter defects and in the classification of tracks.",
keywords = "Anus, endoanal MRI, Anus, endoanal sonography",
author = "Jaap Stoker and Shahid Hussain and Lam{\'e}ris, {Johan S.}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "738--741",
journal = "Radiologia Medica",
issn = "0033-8362",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging versus endosonography

AU - Stoker, Jaap

AU - Hussain, Shahid

AU - Laméris, Johan S.

PY - 1996/12/1

Y1 - 1996/12/1

N2 - Introduction: A major limitation of anal endosonography is the poor inherent contrast, which is the cause of the cumbersome identification of the longitudinal layer and external sphincter. Endoanal MRI was introduced to overcome this problem. The normal anatomy, perianal fistulas and sphincter defects as visualized by endoanal MR1 as compared to endoanal sonography are discussed. Material and methods: Endoanal sonography was performed with an 18-mm diameter 7-MHz endoanal probe. For endoanal MRI a 19-mm diameter endoanal receiver coil was used at O 5 T. Volunteers and patients with anal fistula or fecal incontinence were examined with both techniques. Results: Endoanal MRI demonstrates the internal sphincter but also the longitudinal layer and external sphincter in great detail. The external sphincter is the lower outer part of the sphincter, while the puborectal muscle is the upper outer part of the sphincter which is connected to the levator ani muscle. External sphincter defects are more often identified and better delineated with MRI. Endoanal MRI is superior in the identification and classification of perianal fistulas. Conclusion: Endoanal MRI is an important new diagnostic tool in anal imaging. The anal sphincter anatomy and pathology are excellently demonstrated. Endoanal MRI is superior to endoanal sonography, especially in the identification of external sphincter defects and in the classification of tracks.

AB - Introduction: A major limitation of anal endosonography is the poor inherent contrast, which is the cause of the cumbersome identification of the longitudinal layer and external sphincter. Endoanal MRI was introduced to overcome this problem. The normal anatomy, perianal fistulas and sphincter defects as visualized by endoanal MR1 as compared to endoanal sonography are discussed. Material and methods: Endoanal sonography was performed with an 18-mm diameter 7-MHz endoanal probe. For endoanal MRI a 19-mm diameter endoanal receiver coil was used at O 5 T. Volunteers and patients with anal fistula or fecal incontinence were examined with both techniques. Results: Endoanal MRI demonstrates the internal sphincter but also the longitudinal layer and external sphincter in great detail. The external sphincter is the lower outer part of the sphincter, while the puborectal muscle is the upper outer part of the sphincter which is connected to the levator ani muscle. External sphincter defects are more often identified and better delineated with MRI. Endoanal MRI is superior in the identification and classification of perianal fistulas. Conclusion: Endoanal MRI is an important new diagnostic tool in anal imaging. The anal sphincter anatomy and pathology are excellently demonstrated. Endoanal MRI is superior to endoanal sonography, especially in the identification of external sphincter defects and in the classification of tracks.

KW - Anus, endoanal MRI

KW - Anus, endoanal sonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030339997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030339997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 738

EP - 741

JO - Radiologia Medica

JF - Radiologia Medica

SN - 0033-8362

IS - 6

ER -