Employees' feelings about more meetings

An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings

Joseph A Allen, Stephanie J. Sands, Stephanie L. Mueller, Katherine A. Frear, Mara Mudd, Steven G. Rogelberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify how employees feel about having more meetings and what can be done to improve employees' feelings about their work meetings. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from three samples of working adults. The first was a convenience sample recruited by undergraduate students (n=120), the second was a stratified random sample from a metropolitan area in the southern USA (n=126), and the third was an internet-based panel sample (n=402). Constant comparative analysis of responses to open-ended questions was used to investigate the overarching research questions. Findings: It is found that employees enjoy meetings when they have a clear objective, and when important relevant information is shared. Consistent with conservation of resources theory, most employees are unhappy with meetings when they reduce their work-related resources (e.g. meetings constrain their time, lack structure and are unproductive). Practical implications: The data suggest that meetings appear to be both resource-draining and resource-supplying activities in the workplace. Researchers and managers should consider overtly asking about how people feel about meetings, as a means of identifying areas for future research inquiry and targets for improvement in the workplace generally. Originality/value: The paper describes one of the few studies on meetings that ask the participants overtly what their feelings are regarding their workplace meetings. Additionally, the paper illustrates the usefulness of qualitative data analysis as a means for further understanding workplace activities viewing respondents as informants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-418
Number of pages14
JournalManagement Research Review
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Work place
Employees
Resources
World Wide Web
Usefulness
Conservation of resources
Design methodology
Qualitative data
Managers
Undergraduate students
Metropolitan areas
Comparative analysis

Keywords

  • Employees attitudes
  • Employees behaviour
  • Employees participation
  • Meeting demands
  • Meetings
  • Qualitative research
  • Thematic analysis
  • United States of America

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Employees' feelings about more meetings : An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. / Allen, Joseph A; Sands, Stephanie J.; Mueller, Stephanie L.; Frear, Katherine A.; Mudd, Mara; Rogelberg, Steven G.

In: Management Research Review, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.04.2012, p. 405-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allen, Joseph A ; Sands, Stephanie J. ; Mueller, Stephanie L. ; Frear, Katherine A. ; Mudd, Mara ; Rogelberg, Steven G. / Employees' feelings about more meetings : An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. In: Management Research Review. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 405-418.
@article{7020aa450f4c4311940e3ec9e5df87ac,
title = "Employees' feelings about more meetings: An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify how employees feel about having more meetings and what can be done to improve employees' feelings about their work meetings. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from three samples of working adults. The first was a convenience sample recruited by undergraduate students (n=120), the second was a stratified random sample from a metropolitan area in the southern USA (n=126), and the third was an internet-based panel sample (n=402). Constant comparative analysis of responses to open-ended questions was used to investigate the overarching research questions. Findings: It is found that employees enjoy meetings when they have a clear objective, and when important relevant information is shared. Consistent with conservation of resources theory, most employees are unhappy with meetings when they reduce their work-related resources (e.g. meetings constrain their time, lack structure and are unproductive). Practical implications: The data suggest that meetings appear to be both resource-draining and resource-supplying activities in the workplace. Researchers and managers should consider overtly asking about how people feel about meetings, as a means of identifying areas for future research inquiry and targets for improvement in the workplace generally. Originality/value: The paper describes one of the few studies on meetings that ask the participants overtly what their feelings are regarding their workplace meetings. Additionally, the paper illustrates the usefulness of qualitative data analysis as a means for further understanding workplace activities viewing respondents as informants.",
keywords = "Employees attitudes, Employees behaviour, Employees participation, Meeting demands, Meetings, Qualitative research, Thematic analysis, United States of America",
author = "Allen, {Joseph A} and Sands, {Stephanie J.} and Mueller, {Stephanie L.} and Frear, {Katherine A.} and Mara Mudd and Rogelberg, {Steven G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/01409171211222331",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "405--418",
journal = "Management Research Review",
issn = "2040-8269",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employees' feelings about more meetings

T2 - An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings

AU - Allen, Joseph A

AU - Sands, Stephanie J.

AU - Mueller, Stephanie L.

AU - Frear, Katherine A.

AU - Mudd, Mara

AU - Rogelberg, Steven G.

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify how employees feel about having more meetings and what can be done to improve employees' feelings about their work meetings. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from three samples of working adults. The first was a convenience sample recruited by undergraduate students (n=120), the second was a stratified random sample from a metropolitan area in the southern USA (n=126), and the third was an internet-based panel sample (n=402). Constant comparative analysis of responses to open-ended questions was used to investigate the overarching research questions. Findings: It is found that employees enjoy meetings when they have a clear objective, and when important relevant information is shared. Consistent with conservation of resources theory, most employees are unhappy with meetings when they reduce their work-related resources (e.g. meetings constrain their time, lack structure and are unproductive). Practical implications: The data suggest that meetings appear to be both resource-draining and resource-supplying activities in the workplace. Researchers and managers should consider overtly asking about how people feel about meetings, as a means of identifying areas for future research inquiry and targets for improvement in the workplace generally. Originality/value: The paper describes one of the few studies on meetings that ask the participants overtly what their feelings are regarding their workplace meetings. Additionally, the paper illustrates the usefulness of qualitative data analysis as a means for further understanding workplace activities viewing respondents as informants.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify how employees feel about having more meetings and what can be done to improve employees' feelings about their work meetings. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from three samples of working adults. The first was a convenience sample recruited by undergraduate students (n=120), the second was a stratified random sample from a metropolitan area in the southern USA (n=126), and the third was an internet-based panel sample (n=402). Constant comparative analysis of responses to open-ended questions was used to investigate the overarching research questions. Findings: It is found that employees enjoy meetings when they have a clear objective, and when important relevant information is shared. Consistent with conservation of resources theory, most employees are unhappy with meetings when they reduce their work-related resources (e.g. meetings constrain their time, lack structure and are unproductive). Practical implications: The data suggest that meetings appear to be both resource-draining and resource-supplying activities in the workplace. Researchers and managers should consider overtly asking about how people feel about meetings, as a means of identifying areas for future research inquiry and targets for improvement in the workplace generally. Originality/value: The paper describes one of the few studies on meetings that ask the participants overtly what their feelings are regarding their workplace meetings. Additionally, the paper illustrates the usefulness of qualitative data analysis as a means for further understanding workplace activities viewing respondents as informants.

KW - Employees attitudes

KW - Employees behaviour

KW - Employees participation

KW - Meeting demands

KW - Meetings

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Thematic analysis

KW - United States of America

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859904438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859904438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/01409171211222331

DO - 10.1108/01409171211222331

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 405

EP - 418

JO - Management Research Review

JF - Management Research Review

SN - 2040-8269

IS - 5

ER -