Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays

Michelle L. Hughes, Paul J. Abbas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design andor perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1538-1547
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume119
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

ranking
thresholds
electrodes
interactions
discrimination
Cochlear Implant
Interaction
Ranking
cochlea
nuclei

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. / Hughes, Michelle L.; Abbas, Paul J.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 119, No. 3, 01.03.2006, p. 1538-1547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0252d8a9be0482fbca092643b43211d,
title = "Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays",
abstract = "The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design andor perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects.",
author = "Hughes, {Michelle L.} and Abbas, {Paul J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.2164969",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "1538--1547",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays

AU - Hughes, Michelle L.

AU - Abbas, Paul J.

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design andor perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects.

AB - The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design andor perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644645820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644645820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.2164969

DO - 10.1121/1.2164969

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1538

EP - 1547

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 3

ER -