Electronic medical records and public perceptions

A deliberative process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-57
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic medical equipment
Electronic Health Records
Confidentiality
Electronic medical record
Public perception

Keywords

  • Deliberation
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)
  • Health Information Technology
  • Public Input

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

@article{7e24541fa08c469d90c01b533a96d97e,
title = "Electronic medical records and public perceptions: A deliberative process",
abstract = "Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.",
keywords = "Deliberation, Electronic Health Records, Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), Health Information Technology, Public Input",
author = "Abdel-Monem, {Tarik L} and Herian, {Mitchel N.} and Shank, {Nancy C}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4018/jhisi.2013070103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "38--57",
journal = "International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics",
issn = "1555-3396",
publisher = "IGI Global Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic medical records and public perceptions

T2 - A deliberative process

AU - Abdel-Monem, Tarik L

AU - Herian, Mitchel N.

AU - Shank, Nancy C

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

AB - Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

KW - Deliberation

KW - Electronic Health Records

KW - Electronic Medical Records (EMRs)

KW - Health Information Technology

KW - Public Input

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893466932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893466932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/jhisi.2013070103

DO - 10.4018/jhisi.2013070103

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 38

EP - 57

JO - International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics

JF - International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics

SN - 1555-3396

IS - 3

ER -