Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism

Comparative study

Lance J Kugler, Ilan Cohen, Walid Haddad, Ming X. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting: Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups. Results: The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .036). Conclusion: The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1745-1752
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of cataract and refractive surgery
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Astigmatism
Private Practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism : Comparative study. / Kugler, Lance J; Cohen, Ilan; Haddad, Walid; Wang, Ming X.

In: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, Vol. 36, No. 10, 01.10.2010, p. 1745-1752.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b6a745852ca047d08a6a4845028903b7,
title = "Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism: Comparative study",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting: Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups. Results: The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .036). Conclusion: The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface.",
author = "Kugler, {Lance J} and Ilan Cohen and Walid Haddad and Wang, {Ming X.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1745--1752",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting anterior and non-anterior corneal astigmatism

T2 - Comparative study

AU - Kugler, Lance J

AU - Cohen, Ilan

AU - Haddad, Walid

AU - Wang, Ming X.

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting: Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups. Results: The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .036). Conclusion: The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface.

AB - Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating corneal astigmatism and in treating noncorneal ocular residual astigmatism. Setting: Private practice, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: The records of dominant eyes of consecutive patients who had LASIK were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy of LASIK in eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism with the efficacy in eyes with predominantly ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). The ORA was determined by vector analysis using refractive cylinder and topographic astigmatism. Preoperatively, the ratio of ORA to preoperative refractive cylinder (R) was used to divide the patients into 2 groups; that is, eyes with predominantly anterior corneal astigmatism (ORA/R ratio <1.0) and eyes with predominantly ORA (ORA/R ratio ≥1.0). Efficacy was determined by examining the magnitude of the remaining uncorrected astigmatism and comparing the index of success (proportion of preoperative refractive astigmatism that remained uncorrected by LASIK) between the 2 groups. Results: The study evaluated 61 eyes of 61 patients. Conventional LASIK was twice as efficacious in the low-ORA group as in the high-ORA group. The index of success was 0.24 and 0.50, respectively, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .036). Conclusion: The efficacy of astigmatic correction by LASIK was significantly higher in eyes in which the preoperative refractive astigmatism was located mainly on the anterior corneal surface than in eyes in which it was mainly located posterior to the anterior corneal surface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957782168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957782168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.014

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1745

EP - 1752

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 10

ER -