Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry

Todd Asarch, Keith D Allen, Brett Petersen, Soraya Beiraghi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a computerized anesthesia delivery system in reducing pain during injections when compared with a traditional delivery system (i.e., syringe). Methods: Subjects consisted of 57 patients between the ages of 5 and 13 needing operative dentistry using local anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to either the computerized or traditional anesthesia delivery system. Inferior alveolar block injections, palatal, and buccal infiltrations were the only injections administered throughout this study. Pain behavior was videotaped and coded throughout the study. Pain perceptions were rated using a 10 point visual analogue rating scale. Subjects were also asked to rate their overall satisfaction and approval of the dentist and the treatment received. Results: Results of multivariate analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant differences between the computerized and the traditional method of administering local anesthesia when comparing pain ratings and pain behavior. Average pain ratings for the computerized method were 4.5 while the average ratings for the traditional method were 3.6. In addition, all subjects reported overall satisfaction with their dental treatment and that they would be willing to return in the future. Conclusions: A computerized anesthesia injection method was found to be comparable to the traditional method of anesthesia injection. (Pediatr Dent 21:421-424, 1999).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-424
Number of pages4
JournalPediatric dentistry
Volume21
Issue number7
StatePublished - Nov 1 1999

Fingerprint

Pediatric Dentistry
Local Anesthesia
Equipment and Supplies
Pain
Anesthesia
Injections
Operative Dentistry
Pain Perception
Cheek
Syringes
Dentists
Visual Analog Scale
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Multivariate Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry. / Asarch, Todd; Allen, Keith D; Petersen, Brett; Beiraghi, Soraya.

In: Pediatric dentistry, Vol. 21, No. 7, 01.11.1999, p. 421-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Asarch, T, Allen, KD, Petersen, B & Beiraghi, S 1999, 'Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry', Pediatric dentistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 421-424.
Asarch, Todd ; Allen, Keith D ; Petersen, Brett ; Beiraghi, Soraya. / Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry. In: Pediatric dentistry. 1999 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 421-424.
@article{e24f5d665ef24202a604089163f04b80,
title = "Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a computerized anesthesia delivery system in reducing pain during injections when compared with a traditional delivery system (i.e., syringe). Methods: Subjects consisted of 57 patients between the ages of 5 and 13 needing operative dentistry using local anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to either the computerized or traditional anesthesia delivery system. Inferior alveolar block injections, palatal, and buccal infiltrations were the only injections administered throughout this study. Pain behavior was videotaped and coded throughout the study. Pain perceptions were rated using a 10 point visual analogue rating scale. Subjects were also asked to rate their overall satisfaction and approval of the dentist and the treatment received. Results: Results of multivariate analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant differences between the computerized and the traditional method of administering local anesthesia when comparing pain ratings and pain behavior. Average pain ratings for the computerized method were 4.5 while the average ratings for the traditional method were 3.6. In addition, all subjects reported overall satisfaction with their dental treatment and that they would be willing to return in the future. Conclusions: A computerized anesthesia injection method was found to be comparable to the traditional method of anesthesia injection. (Pediatr Dent 21:421-424, 1999).",
author = "Todd Asarch and Allen, {Keith D} and Brett Petersen and Soraya Beiraghi",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "421--424",
journal = "Pediatric Dentistry",
issn = "0164-1263",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of a computerized local anesthesia device in pediatric dentistry

AU - Asarch, Todd

AU - Allen, Keith D

AU - Petersen, Brett

AU - Beiraghi, Soraya

PY - 1999/11/1

Y1 - 1999/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a computerized anesthesia delivery system in reducing pain during injections when compared with a traditional delivery system (i.e., syringe). Methods: Subjects consisted of 57 patients between the ages of 5 and 13 needing operative dentistry using local anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to either the computerized or traditional anesthesia delivery system. Inferior alveolar block injections, palatal, and buccal infiltrations were the only injections administered throughout this study. Pain behavior was videotaped and coded throughout the study. Pain perceptions were rated using a 10 point visual analogue rating scale. Subjects were also asked to rate their overall satisfaction and approval of the dentist and the treatment received. Results: Results of multivariate analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant differences between the computerized and the traditional method of administering local anesthesia when comparing pain ratings and pain behavior. Average pain ratings for the computerized method were 4.5 while the average ratings for the traditional method were 3.6. In addition, all subjects reported overall satisfaction with their dental treatment and that they would be willing to return in the future. Conclusions: A computerized anesthesia injection method was found to be comparable to the traditional method of anesthesia injection. (Pediatr Dent 21:421-424, 1999).

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a computerized anesthesia delivery system in reducing pain during injections when compared with a traditional delivery system (i.e., syringe). Methods: Subjects consisted of 57 patients between the ages of 5 and 13 needing operative dentistry using local anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to either the computerized or traditional anesthesia delivery system. Inferior alveolar block injections, palatal, and buccal infiltrations were the only injections administered throughout this study. Pain behavior was videotaped and coded throughout the study. Pain perceptions were rated using a 10 point visual analogue rating scale. Subjects were also asked to rate their overall satisfaction and approval of the dentist and the treatment received. Results: Results of multivariate analysis of variance indicated that there were no significant differences between the computerized and the traditional method of administering local anesthesia when comparing pain ratings and pain behavior. Average pain ratings for the computerized method were 4.5 while the average ratings for the traditional method were 3.6. In addition, all subjects reported overall satisfaction with their dental treatment and that they would be willing to return in the future. Conclusions: A computerized anesthesia injection method was found to be comparable to the traditional method of anesthesia injection. (Pediatr Dent 21:421-424, 1999).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033218246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033218246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10633514

AN - SCOPUS:0033218246

VL - 21

SP - 421

EP - 424

JO - Pediatric Dentistry

JF - Pediatric Dentistry

SN - 0164-1263

IS - 7

ER -