Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology

Karolinne Maia Rocha, Laurent Vabre, Fabrice Harms, Nicolas Chateau, Ronald R Krueger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study measured the changes in visual acuity induced by individual Zernike ocular aberrations of various root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes. METHODS: A crx1 Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator (Imagine Eyes) was used to modify the wavefront aberrations in nine eyes. After measuring ocular aberrations, the device was programmed to compensate for the eye's wavefront error up to the 4th order and successively apply different individual Zernike aberrations using a 5-mm pupil. The generated aberrations included defocus, astigmatism, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration at a level of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.9 μm. Monocular visual acuity was assessed using computer-generated Landolt-C optotypes. RESULTS: Correction of the patients' aberrations improved visual acuity by a mean of 1 line (-0.1 logMAR) compared to best sphero-cylinder correction. Aberrations of 0.1 μm RMS resulted in a limited decrease in visual acuity (mean +0.05 logMAR), whereas aberrations of 0.3 μm RMS induced significant visual acuity losses with a mean reduction of 1.5 lines (+0.15 logMAR). Larger aberrations of 0.9 μm RMS resulted in greater visual acuity losses that were more pronounced with spherical aberration (+0.64 logMAR) and defocus (+0.62 logMAR), whereas trefoil (+0.22 logMAR) was found to be better tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The electromagnetic adaptive optics visual simulator effectively corrected and generated wavefront aberrations up to the 4th order. Custom wavefront correction significantly improved visual acuity compared to best-spectacle correction. Symmetric aberrations (eg, defocus and spherical aberration) were more detrimental to visual performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)953-959
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume23
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic Phenomena
Visual Acuity
Technology
Astigmatism
Pupil
Coma
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology. / Rocha, Karolinne Maia; Vabre, Laurent; Harms, Fabrice; Chateau, Nicolas; Krueger, Ronald R.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 9, 01.11.2007, p. 953-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rocha, Karolinne Maia ; Vabre, Laurent ; Harms, Fabrice ; Chateau, Nicolas ; Krueger, Ronald R. / Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 953-959.
@article{8be7c572243d4821839de7d8d403bab7,
title = "Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study measured the changes in visual acuity induced by individual Zernike ocular aberrations of various root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes. METHODS: A crx1 Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator (Imagine Eyes) was used to modify the wavefront aberrations in nine eyes. After measuring ocular aberrations, the device was programmed to compensate for the eye's wavefront error up to the 4th order and successively apply different individual Zernike aberrations using a 5-mm pupil. The generated aberrations included defocus, astigmatism, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration at a level of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.9 μm. Monocular visual acuity was assessed using computer-generated Landolt-C optotypes. RESULTS: Correction of the patients' aberrations improved visual acuity by a mean of 1 line (-0.1 logMAR) compared to best sphero-cylinder correction. Aberrations of 0.1 μm RMS resulted in a limited decrease in visual acuity (mean +0.05 logMAR), whereas aberrations of 0.3 μm RMS induced significant visual acuity losses with a mean reduction of 1.5 lines (+0.15 logMAR). Larger aberrations of 0.9 μm RMS resulted in greater visual acuity losses that were more pronounced with spherical aberration (+0.64 logMAR) and defocus (+0.62 logMAR), whereas trefoil (+0.22 logMAR) was found to be better tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The electromagnetic adaptive optics visual simulator effectively corrected and generated wavefront aberrations up to the 4th order. Custom wavefront correction significantly improved visual acuity compared to best-spectacle correction. Symmetric aberrations (eg, defocus and spherical aberration) were more detrimental to visual performance.",
author = "Rocha, {Karolinne Maia} and Laurent Vabre and Fabrice Harms and Nicolas Chateau and Krueger, {Ronald R}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "953--959",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology

AU - Rocha, Karolinne Maia

AU - Vabre, Laurent

AU - Harms, Fabrice

AU - Chateau, Nicolas

AU - Krueger, Ronald R

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: This study measured the changes in visual acuity induced by individual Zernike ocular aberrations of various root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes. METHODS: A crx1 Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator (Imagine Eyes) was used to modify the wavefront aberrations in nine eyes. After measuring ocular aberrations, the device was programmed to compensate for the eye's wavefront error up to the 4th order and successively apply different individual Zernike aberrations using a 5-mm pupil. The generated aberrations included defocus, astigmatism, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration at a level of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.9 μm. Monocular visual acuity was assessed using computer-generated Landolt-C optotypes. RESULTS: Correction of the patients' aberrations improved visual acuity by a mean of 1 line (-0.1 logMAR) compared to best sphero-cylinder correction. Aberrations of 0.1 μm RMS resulted in a limited decrease in visual acuity (mean +0.05 logMAR), whereas aberrations of 0.3 μm RMS induced significant visual acuity losses with a mean reduction of 1.5 lines (+0.15 logMAR). Larger aberrations of 0.9 μm RMS resulted in greater visual acuity losses that were more pronounced with spherical aberration (+0.64 logMAR) and defocus (+0.62 logMAR), whereas trefoil (+0.22 logMAR) was found to be better tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The electromagnetic adaptive optics visual simulator effectively corrected and generated wavefront aberrations up to the 4th order. Custom wavefront correction significantly improved visual acuity compared to best-spectacle correction. Symmetric aberrations (eg, defocus and spherical aberration) were more detrimental to visual performance.

AB - PURPOSE: This study measured the changes in visual acuity induced by individual Zernike ocular aberrations of various root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes. METHODS: A crx1 Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator (Imagine Eyes) was used to modify the wavefront aberrations in nine eyes. After measuring ocular aberrations, the device was programmed to compensate for the eye's wavefront error up to the 4th order and successively apply different individual Zernike aberrations using a 5-mm pupil. The generated aberrations included defocus, astigmatism, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration at a level of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.9 μm. Monocular visual acuity was assessed using computer-generated Landolt-C optotypes. RESULTS: Correction of the patients' aberrations improved visual acuity by a mean of 1 line (-0.1 logMAR) compared to best sphero-cylinder correction. Aberrations of 0.1 μm RMS resulted in a limited decrease in visual acuity (mean +0.05 logMAR), whereas aberrations of 0.3 μm RMS induced significant visual acuity losses with a mean reduction of 1.5 lines (+0.15 logMAR). Larger aberrations of 0.9 μm RMS resulted in greater visual acuity losses that were more pronounced with spherical aberration (+0.64 logMAR) and defocus (+0.62 logMAR), whereas trefoil (+0.22 logMAR) was found to be better tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The electromagnetic adaptive optics visual simulator effectively corrected and generated wavefront aberrations up to the 4th order. Custom wavefront correction significantly improved visual acuity compared to best-spectacle correction. Symmetric aberrations (eg, defocus and spherical aberration) were more detrimental to visual performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36448991611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36448991611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 953

EP - 959

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 9

ER -