Effects of Specific Exercise Instructions on Abdominal Muscle Activity during Trunk Curl Exercises

Gregory M Karst, Gilbert M. Willett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Objectives: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. Background: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. Methods and Measures: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. Results: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 ± 0.34) than when following RE (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 ± 0.24) or NS (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 ± 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. Conclusions: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk curls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-12
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Abdominal Muscles
Rectus Abdominis
Muscles
Abdominal Oblique Muscles

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • Lumbar spine
  • Lumbar stabilization
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effects of Specific Exercise Instructions on Abdominal Muscle Activity during Trunk Curl Exercises. / Karst, Gregory M; Willett, Gilbert M.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 4-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b49f5444eef140e6a54f0689a325b249,
title = "Effects of Specific Exercise Instructions on Abdominal Muscle Activity during Trunk Curl Exercises",
abstract = "Study Design: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Objectives: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. Background: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. Methods and Measures: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. Results: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 ± 0.34) than when following RE (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 ± 0.24) or NS (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 ± 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. Conclusions: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk curls.",
keywords = "Electromyography, Lumbar spine, Lumbar stabilization, Rehabilitation",
author = "Karst, {Gregory M} and Willett, {Gilbert M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2519/jospt.2004.34.1.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "4--12",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy",
issn = "0190-6011",
publisher = "JOSPT",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Specific Exercise Instructions on Abdominal Muscle Activity during Trunk Curl Exercises

AU - Karst, Gregory M

AU - Willett, Gilbert M.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Study Design: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Objectives: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. Background: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. Methods and Measures: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. Results: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 ± 0.34) than when following RE (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 ± 0.24) or NS (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 ± 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. Conclusions: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk curls.

AB - Study Design: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Objectives: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. Background: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. Methods and Measures: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. Results: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 ± 0.34) than when following RE (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 ± 0.24) or NS (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 ± 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. Conclusions: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk curls.

KW - Electromyography

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Lumbar stabilization

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0742266635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0742266635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.1.4

DO - 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.1.4

M3 - Article

C2 - 14964586

AN - SCOPUS:0742266635

VL - 34

SP - 4

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

SN - 0190-6011

IS - 1

ER -