Effects of Smiley Face Scales on Visual Processing of Satisfaction Questions in Web Surveys

Mathew Stange, Amanda Barry, Jolene Smyth, Kristen Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Web surveys permit researchers to use graphic or symbolic elements alongside the text of response options to help respondents process the categories. Smiley faces are one example used to communicate positive and negative domains. How respondents visually process these smiley faces, including whether they detract from the question’s text, is understudied. We report the results of two eye-tracking experiments in which satisfaction questions were asked with and without smiley faces. Respondents to the questions with smiley faces spent less time reading the question stem and response option text than respondents to the questions without smiley faces, but the response distributions did not differ by version. We also find support that lower literacy respondents rely more on the smiley faces than higher literacy respondents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)756-766
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science Computer Review
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Processing
literacy
Experiments
experiment
time

Keywords

  • eye tracking
  • smiley faces
  • visual design
  • web surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

Effects of Smiley Face Scales on Visual Processing of Satisfaction Questions in Web Surveys. / Stange, Mathew; Barry, Amanda; Smyth, Jolene; Olson, Kristen.

In: Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 756-766.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e9e7da10f434a799e377ca18f6178a1,
title = "Effects of Smiley Face Scales on Visual Processing of Satisfaction Questions in Web Surveys",
abstract = "Web surveys permit researchers to use graphic or symbolic elements alongside the text of response options to help respondents process the categories. Smiley faces are one example used to communicate positive and negative domains. How respondents visually process these smiley faces, including whether they detract from the question’s text, is understudied. We report the results of two eye-tracking experiments in which satisfaction questions were asked with and without smiley faces. Respondents to the questions with smiley faces spent less time reading the question stem and response option text than respondents to the questions without smiley faces, but the response distributions did not differ by version. We also find support that lower literacy respondents rely more on the smiley faces than higher literacy respondents.",
keywords = "eye tracking, smiley faces, visual design, web surveys",
author = "Mathew Stange and Amanda Barry and Jolene Smyth and Kristen Olson",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0894439316674166",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "756--766",
journal = "Social Science Computer Review",
issn = "0894-4393",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Smiley Face Scales on Visual Processing of Satisfaction Questions in Web Surveys

AU - Stange, Mathew

AU - Barry, Amanda

AU - Smyth, Jolene

AU - Olson, Kristen

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Web surveys permit researchers to use graphic or symbolic elements alongside the text of response options to help respondents process the categories. Smiley faces are one example used to communicate positive and negative domains. How respondents visually process these smiley faces, including whether they detract from the question’s text, is understudied. We report the results of two eye-tracking experiments in which satisfaction questions were asked with and without smiley faces. Respondents to the questions with smiley faces spent less time reading the question stem and response option text than respondents to the questions without smiley faces, but the response distributions did not differ by version. We also find support that lower literacy respondents rely more on the smiley faces than higher literacy respondents.

AB - Web surveys permit researchers to use graphic or symbolic elements alongside the text of response options to help respondents process the categories. Smiley faces are one example used to communicate positive and negative domains. How respondents visually process these smiley faces, including whether they detract from the question’s text, is understudied. We report the results of two eye-tracking experiments in which satisfaction questions were asked with and without smiley faces. Respondents to the questions with smiley faces spent less time reading the question stem and response option text than respondents to the questions without smiley faces, but the response distributions did not differ by version. We also find support that lower literacy respondents rely more on the smiley faces than higher literacy respondents.

KW - eye tracking

KW - smiley faces

KW - visual design

KW - web surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056596409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056596409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0894439316674166

DO - 10.1177/0894439316674166

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056596409

VL - 36

SP - 756

EP - 766

JO - Social Science Computer Review

JF - Social Science Computer Review

SN - 0894-4393

IS - 6

ER -