Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions

Cynthia E. Willis, Marianne N. Hallinan, Jeffrey Melby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effects of European American students' sex role stereotyping and domestic violence participants' race and relationship intimacy were examined for culpability attributions. In addition to a man's responsibility rating and a sentencing measure, five factors were identified from the dependent measures; these were Sympathy with Man, Incident as Abusive, Generalness of Incident, Seriousness of Incident, and Man as Abuser. Results indicated that sex role stereotyping was influential in culpability attributions, as those with traditional orientations showed a favorable bias toward the man, particularly a married man. Traditionalists provided a shorter sentence for the man and thought the incident less abusive when the woman was African American, in comparison to egalitarians. Both egalitarians and traditionalists expressed more sympathy toward the man when the woman was African American and married. Although we had anticipated higher culpability ratings for women involved in interracial relationships, we found that the European American man was thought less responsible when the woman was African American, but no differences emerged when the woman was European American. It is suggested future research examine the specific content of various stereotypic subtypes of actors involved in domestic violence and how these stereotypic subtypes bias culpability attributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-491
Number of pages17
JournalSex Roles
Volume34
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1996

Fingerprint

Stereotyping
Domestic Violence
domestic violence
attribution
Students
incident
sympathy
student
African Americans
rating
trend
intimacy
responsibility
American

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions. / Willis, Cynthia E.; Hallinan, Marianne N.; Melby, Jeffrey.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 34, No. 7-8, 04.1996, p. 475-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b5067948de743d796ff6e6e054f8f35,
title = "Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions",
abstract = "Effects of European American students' sex role stereotyping and domestic violence participants' race and relationship intimacy were examined for culpability attributions. In addition to a man's responsibility rating and a sentencing measure, five factors were identified from the dependent measures; these were Sympathy with Man, Incident as Abusive, Generalness of Incident, Seriousness of Incident, and Man as Abuser. Results indicated that sex role stereotyping was influential in culpability attributions, as those with traditional orientations showed a favorable bias toward the man, particularly a married man. Traditionalists provided a shorter sentence for the man and thought the incident less abusive when the woman was African American, in comparison to egalitarians. Both egalitarians and traditionalists expressed more sympathy toward the man when the woman was African American and married. Although we had anticipated higher culpability ratings for women involved in interracial relationships, we found that the European American man was thought less responsible when the woman was African American, but no differences emerged when the woman was European American. It is suggested future research examine the specific content of various stereotypic subtypes of actors involved in domestic violence and how these stereotypic subtypes bias culpability attributions.",
author = "Willis, {Cynthia E.} and Hallinan, {Marianne N.} and Jeffrey Melby",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/BF01545027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "475--491",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of sex role stereotyping among European American students on domestic violence culpability attributions

AU - Willis, Cynthia E.

AU - Hallinan, Marianne N.

AU - Melby, Jeffrey

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - Effects of European American students' sex role stereotyping and domestic violence participants' race and relationship intimacy were examined for culpability attributions. In addition to a man's responsibility rating and a sentencing measure, five factors were identified from the dependent measures; these were Sympathy with Man, Incident as Abusive, Generalness of Incident, Seriousness of Incident, and Man as Abuser. Results indicated that sex role stereotyping was influential in culpability attributions, as those with traditional orientations showed a favorable bias toward the man, particularly a married man. Traditionalists provided a shorter sentence for the man and thought the incident less abusive when the woman was African American, in comparison to egalitarians. Both egalitarians and traditionalists expressed more sympathy toward the man when the woman was African American and married. Although we had anticipated higher culpability ratings for women involved in interracial relationships, we found that the European American man was thought less responsible when the woman was African American, but no differences emerged when the woman was European American. It is suggested future research examine the specific content of various stereotypic subtypes of actors involved in domestic violence and how these stereotypic subtypes bias culpability attributions.

AB - Effects of European American students' sex role stereotyping and domestic violence participants' race and relationship intimacy were examined for culpability attributions. In addition to a man's responsibility rating and a sentencing measure, five factors were identified from the dependent measures; these were Sympathy with Man, Incident as Abusive, Generalness of Incident, Seriousness of Incident, and Man as Abuser. Results indicated that sex role stereotyping was influential in culpability attributions, as those with traditional orientations showed a favorable bias toward the man, particularly a married man. Traditionalists provided a shorter sentence for the man and thought the incident less abusive when the woman was African American, in comparison to egalitarians. Both egalitarians and traditionalists expressed more sympathy toward the man when the woman was African American and married. Although we had anticipated higher culpability ratings for women involved in interracial relationships, we found that the European American man was thought less responsible when the woman was African American, but no differences emerged when the woman was European American. It is suggested future research examine the specific content of various stereotypic subtypes of actors involved in domestic violence and how these stereotypic subtypes bias culpability attributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030556764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030556764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01545027

DO - 10.1007/BF01545027

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030556764

VL - 34

SP - 475

EP - 491

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 7-8

ER -