Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges

William Douglas Woody, Joshua M. Stewart, Krista D. Forrest, Lourdes Janet Camacho, Skye A. Woestehoff, Karlee R. Provenza, Alexis T. Walker, Steven J. Powner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Triers of fact evaluated trial materials involving disputed confessions, false-evidence ploys (FEPs) during interrogation, and expert testimony. In two experiments, we assessed pre-deliberation and post-deliberation trial decisions as well as individual jurors’ perceptions, deliberating juries’ verdicts, and sitting judges’ perceptions and trial decisions. Judges convicted more often than did juries. Although triers of fact recognized the deception inherent in FEPs, the use of FEPs in police interrogations did not affect these decision-makers’ trial outcomes. Expert testimony, however, affected perceptions and reduced jurors’, deliberating juries’, and sitting judges’ likelihood of conviction. We provide recommendations for courts, scholars, and police interrogators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalCogent Psychology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
Police
Deception

Keywords

  • expert testimony
  • false-evidence ploys
  • judicial decision-making
  • jury deliberation
  • police interrogation and confession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Woody, W. D., Stewart, J. M., Forrest, K. D., Camacho, L. J., Woestehoff, S. A., Provenza, K. R., ... Powner, S. J. (2018). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744

Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. / Woody, William Douglas; Stewart, Joshua M.; Forrest, Krista D.; Camacho, Lourdes Janet; Woestehoff, Skye A.; Provenza, Karlee R.; Walker, Alexis T.; Powner, Steven J.

In: Cogent Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Woody, WD, Stewart, JM, Forrest, KD, Camacho, LJ, Woestehoff, SA, Provenza, KR, Walker, AT & Powner, SJ 2018, 'Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges', Cogent Psychology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744
Woody, William Douglas ; Stewart, Joshua M. ; Forrest, Krista D. ; Camacho, Lourdes Janet ; Woestehoff, Skye A. ; Provenza, Karlee R. ; Walker, Alexis T. ; Powner, Steven J. / Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. In: Cogent Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 1-22.
@article{3ba9aaa158b54ff58bc7eec2cff99fc9,
title = "Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges",
abstract = "Triers of fact evaluated trial materials involving disputed confessions, false-evidence ploys (FEPs) during interrogation, and expert testimony. In two experiments, we assessed pre-deliberation and post-deliberation trial decisions as well as individual jurors’ perceptions, deliberating juries’ verdicts, and sitting judges’ perceptions and trial decisions. Judges convicted more often than did juries. Although triers of fact recognized the deception inherent in FEPs, the use of FEPs in police interrogations did not affect these decision-makers’ trial outcomes. Expert testimony, however, affected perceptions and reduced jurors’, deliberating juries’, and sitting judges’ likelihood of conviction. We provide recommendations for courts, scholars, and police interrogators.",
keywords = "expert testimony, false-evidence ploys, judicial decision-making, jury deliberation, police interrogation and confession",
author = "Woody, {William Douglas} and Stewart, {Joshua M.} and Forrest, {Krista D.} and Camacho, {Lourdes Janet} and Woestehoff, {Skye A.} and Provenza, {Karlee R.} and Walker, {Alexis T.} and Powner, {Steven J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Cogent Psychology",
issn = "2331-1908",
publisher = "Cogent OA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges

AU - Woody, William Douglas

AU - Stewart, Joshua M.

AU - Forrest, Krista D.

AU - Camacho, Lourdes Janet

AU - Woestehoff, Skye A.

AU - Provenza, Karlee R.

AU - Walker, Alexis T.

AU - Powner, Steven J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Triers of fact evaluated trial materials involving disputed confessions, false-evidence ploys (FEPs) during interrogation, and expert testimony. In two experiments, we assessed pre-deliberation and post-deliberation trial decisions as well as individual jurors’ perceptions, deliberating juries’ verdicts, and sitting judges’ perceptions and trial decisions. Judges convicted more often than did juries. Although triers of fact recognized the deception inherent in FEPs, the use of FEPs in police interrogations did not affect these decision-makers’ trial outcomes. Expert testimony, however, affected perceptions and reduced jurors’, deliberating juries’, and sitting judges’ likelihood of conviction. We provide recommendations for courts, scholars, and police interrogators.

AB - Triers of fact evaluated trial materials involving disputed confessions, false-evidence ploys (FEPs) during interrogation, and expert testimony. In two experiments, we assessed pre-deliberation and post-deliberation trial decisions as well as individual jurors’ perceptions, deliberating juries’ verdicts, and sitting judges’ perceptions and trial decisions. Judges convicted more often than did juries. Although triers of fact recognized the deception inherent in FEPs, the use of FEPs in police interrogations did not affect these decision-makers’ trial outcomes. Expert testimony, however, affected perceptions and reduced jurors’, deliberating juries’, and sitting judges’ likelihood of conviction. We provide recommendations for courts, scholars, and police interrogators.

KW - expert testimony

KW - false-evidence ploys

KW - judicial decision-making

KW - jury deliberation

KW - police interrogation and confession

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055158267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055158267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744

DO - 10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055158267

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Cogent Psychology

JF - Cogent Psychology

SN - 2331-1908

IS - 1

ER -