Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment

Karen L. Schumacher, Barbara J. Stewart, Patricia G. Archbold, Mildred Caparro, Faith Mutale, Sangeeta Agrawal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To test a model of family caregiving derived from the interactionist approach to role theory that hypothesized that three caregiving role implementation variables (caregiving demand, mutuality between caregivers and patients, and preparedness for caregiving) would predict multiple caregiving-specific and generic outcomes with different patterns of association across outcomes. Design: Descriptive, correlational. Setting: Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology settings. Sample: 87 family caregivers of adults receiving treatment for solid tumors or lymphoma. Methods: Caregivers completed the Demand and Difficulty subscales of the Caregiving Burden Scale; the Mutuality, Preparedness, and Global Strain scales of the Family Care Inventory, and the 30-item short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data were analyzed with simultaneous multiple regression. Main Research Variables: Caregiving demand, mutuality, preparedness, caregiving difficulty, global caregiver strain, tension, depression, anger, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and total mood disturbance. Findings: The model explained statistically significant proportions of variance in each outcome, with different patterns of association across outcomes. Demand was associated most strongly with caregiving difficulty and global strain. Mutuality was associated most strongly with caregiver anger. Unexpectedly, preparedness was associated more strongly with mood disturbance outcomes than with the caregivingspecific variables of difficulty and strain. Conclusions: Further research should explore models that address implementation of the caregiving role to better elucidate how family caregivers learn and carry out the important role. Implications for Nursing: Clinical assessment should include caregiving demand, the quality of the relationship between caregiver and patient, and preparedness for caregiving. Interventions could be tailored to meet caregiver needs in each area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-56
Number of pages8
JournalOncology nursing forum
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Neoplasms
Anger
Therapeutics
Nursing Assessment
Confusion
Radiation Oncology
Medical Oncology
Research
Fatigue
Lymphoma
Depression
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Schumacher, K. L., Stewart, B. J., Archbold, P. G., Caparro, M., Mutale, F., & Agrawal, S. (2008). Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment. Oncology nursing forum, 35(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1188/08.ONF.49-56

Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment. / Schumacher, Karen L.; Stewart, Barbara J.; Archbold, Patricia G.; Caparro, Mildred; Mutale, Faith; Agrawal, Sangeeta.

In: Oncology nursing forum, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 49-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schumacher, KL, Stewart, BJ, Archbold, PG, Caparro, M, Mutale, F & Agrawal, S 2008, 'Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment', Oncology nursing forum, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1188/08.ONF.49-56
Schumacher, Karen L. ; Stewart, Barbara J. ; Archbold, Patricia G. ; Caparro, Mildred ; Mutale, Faith ; Agrawal, Sangeeta. / Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment. In: Oncology nursing forum. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 49-56.
@article{deea24882438455ba1dab1673c7255f9,
title = "Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To test a model of family caregiving derived from the interactionist approach to role theory that hypothesized that three caregiving role implementation variables (caregiving demand, mutuality between caregivers and patients, and preparedness for caregiving) would predict multiple caregiving-specific and generic outcomes with different patterns of association across outcomes. Design: Descriptive, correlational. Setting: Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology settings. Sample: 87 family caregivers of adults receiving treatment for solid tumors or lymphoma. Methods: Caregivers completed the Demand and Difficulty subscales of the Caregiving Burden Scale; the Mutuality, Preparedness, and Global Strain scales of the Family Care Inventory, and the 30-item short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data were analyzed with simultaneous multiple regression. Main Research Variables: Caregiving demand, mutuality, preparedness, caregiving difficulty, global caregiver strain, tension, depression, anger, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and total mood disturbance. Findings: The model explained statistically significant proportions of variance in each outcome, with different patterns of association across outcomes. Demand was associated most strongly with caregiving difficulty and global strain. Mutuality was associated most strongly with caregiver anger. Unexpectedly, preparedness was associated more strongly with mood disturbance outcomes than with the caregivingspecific variables of difficulty and strain. Conclusions: Further research should explore models that address implementation of the caregiving role to better elucidate how family caregivers learn and carry out the important role. Implications for Nursing: Clinical assessment should include caregiving demand, the quality of the relationship between caregiver and patient, and preparedness for caregiving. Interventions could be tailored to meet caregiver needs in each area.",
author = "Schumacher, {Karen L.} and Stewart, {Barbara J.} and Archbold, {Patricia G.} and Mildred Caparro and Faith Mutale and Sangeeta Agrawal",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1188/08.ONF.49-56",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "49--56",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "0190-535X",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiver outcomes during cancer treatment

AU - Schumacher, Karen L.

AU - Stewart, Barbara J.

AU - Archbold, Patricia G.

AU - Caparro, Mildred

AU - Mutale, Faith

AU - Agrawal, Sangeeta

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To test a model of family caregiving derived from the interactionist approach to role theory that hypothesized that three caregiving role implementation variables (caregiving demand, mutuality between caregivers and patients, and preparedness for caregiving) would predict multiple caregiving-specific and generic outcomes with different patterns of association across outcomes. Design: Descriptive, correlational. Setting: Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology settings. Sample: 87 family caregivers of adults receiving treatment for solid tumors or lymphoma. Methods: Caregivers completed the Demand and Difficulty subscales of the Caregiving Burden Scale; the Mutuality, Preparedness, and Global Strain scales of the Family Care Inventory, and the 30-item short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data were analyzed with simultaneous multiple regression. Main Research Variables: Caregiving demand, mutuality, preparedness, caregiving difficulty, global caregiver strain, tension, depression, anger, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and total mood disturbance. Findings: The model explained statistically significant proportions of variance in each outcome, with different patterns of association across outcomes. Demand was associated most strongly with caregiving difficulty and global strain. Mutuality was associated most strongly with caregiver anger. Unexpectedly, preparedness was associated more strongly with mood disturbance outcomes than with the caregivingspecific variables of difficulty and strain. Conclusions: Further research should explore models that address implementation of the caregiving role to better elucidate how family caregivers learn and carry out the important role. Implications for Nursing: Clinical assessment should include caregiving demand, the quality of the relationship between caregiver and patient, and preparedness for caregiving. Interventions could be tailored to meet caregiver needs in each area.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To test a model of family caregiving derived from the interactionist approach to role theory that hypothesized that three caregiving role implementation variables (caregiving demand, mutuality between caregivers and patients, and preparedness for caregiving) would predict multiple caregiving-specific and generic outcomes with different patterns of association across outcomes. Design: Descriptive, correlational. Setting: Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology settings. Sample: 87 family caregivers of adults receiving treatment for solid tumors or lymphoma. Methods: Caregivers completed the Demand and Difficulty subscales of the Caregiving Burden Scale; the Mutuality, Preparedness, and Global Strain scales of the Family Care Inventory, and the 30-item short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data were analyzed with simultaneous multiple regression. Main Research Variables: Caregiving demand, mutuality, preparedness, caregiving difficulty, global caregiver strain, tension, depression, anger, fatigue, vigor, confusion, and total mood disturbance. Findings: The model explained statistically significant proportions of variance in each outcome, with different patterns of association across outcomes. Demand was associated most strongly with caregiving difficulty and global strain. Mutuality was associated most strongly with caregiver anger. Unexpectedly, preparedness was associated more strongly with mood disturbance outcomes than with the caregivingspecific variables of difficulty and strain. Conclusions: Further research should explore models that address implementation of the caregiving role to better elucidate how family caregivers learn and carry out the important role. Implications for Nursing: Clinical assessment should include caregiving demand, the quality of the relationship between caregiver and patient, and preparedness for caregiving. Interventions could be tailored to meet caregiver needs in each area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849097239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849097239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/08.ONF.49-56

DO - 10.1188/08.ONF.49-56

M3 - Article

C2 - 18192152

AN - SCOPUS:38849097239

VL - 35

SP - 49

EP - 56

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 0190-535X

IS - 1

ER -