Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments

Harmon M. Hosch, Scott E. Culhane, Kevin W. Jolly, Rosa M. Chavez, Leslie H. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies tested the impact of an alibi witness's relationship to a defendant on the perceived credibility of that witness. In the first study, 291 mock jurors estimated the frequency with which individuals would invent alibis, the frequency they themselves would do so, and the frequency of interpersonal contact among individuals of varying relationships. The degree of relationship between an alibi witness and a defendant remained a predictor of witness credibility when contact frequency was controlled. In the second study, 512 mock jurors were randomly assigned to case scenarios. Skepticism toward witnesses who are biologically or affinally related to a defendant was greater than skepticism toward a socially linked witness. Both studies supported predications from kinship theory and reciprocal altruism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-142
Number of pages16
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

Fingerprint

Altruism
witness
credibility
contact
altruism
kinship
Jurors
Witness
scenario

Keywords

  • Alibi witness
  • Altruism
  • Juror
  • Kinship
  • Testimony

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments. / Hosch, Harmon M.; Culhane, Scott E.; Jolly, Kevin W.; Chavez, Rosa M.; Shaw, Leslie H.

In: Law and human behavior, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 127-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hosch, Harmon M. ; Culhane, Scott E. ; Jolly, Kevin W. ; Chavez, Rosa M. ; Shaw, Leslie H. / Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments. In: Law and human behavior. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 127-142.
@article{50c454372cab48c69936f3aab778aadd,
title = "Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments",
abstract = "Two studies tested the impact of an alibi witness's relationship to a defendant on the perceived credibility of that witness. In the first study, 291 mock jurors estimated the frequency with which individuals would invent alibis, the frequency they themselves would do so, and the frequency of interpersonal contact among individuals of varying relationships. The degree of relationship between an alibi witness and a defendant remained a predictor of witness credibility when contact frequency was controlled. In the second study, 512 mock jurors were randomly assigned to case scenarios. Skepticism toward witnesses who are biologically or affinally related to a defendant was greater than skepticism toward a socially linked witness. Both studies supported predications from kinship theory and reciprocal altruism.",
keywords = "Alibi witness, Altruism, Juror, Kinship, Testimony",
author = "Hosch, {Harmon M.} and Culhane, {Scott E.} and Jolly, {Kevin W.} and Chavez, {Rosa M.} and Shaw, {Leslie H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "127--142",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments

AU - Hosch, Harmon M.

AU - Culhane, Scott E.

AU - Jolly, Kevin W.

AU - Chavez, Rosa M.

AU - Shaw, Leslie H.

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Two studies tested the impact of an alibi witness's relationship to a defendant on the perceived credibility of that witness. In the first study, 291 mock jurors estimated the frequency with which individuals would invent alibis, the frequency they themselves would do so, and the frequency of interpersonal contact among individuals of varying relationships. The degree of relationship between an alibi witness and a defendant remained a predictor of witness credibility when contact frequency was controlled. In the second study, 512 mock jurors were randomly assigned to case scenarios. Skepticism toward witnesses who are biologically or affinally related to a defendant was greater than skepticism toward a socially linked witness. Both studies supported predications from kinship theory and reciprocal altruism.

AB - Two studies tested the impact of an alibi witness's relationship to a defendant on the perceived credibility of that witness. In the first study, 291 mock jurors estimated the frequency with which individuals would invent alibis, the frequency they themselves would do so, and the frequency of interpersonal contact among individuals of varying relationships. The degree of relationship between an alibi witness and a defendant remained a predictor of witness credibility when contact frequency was controlled. In the second study, 512 mock jurors were randomly assigned to case scenarios. Skepticism toward witnesses who are biologically or affinally related to a defendant was greater than skepticism toward a socially linked witness. Both studies supported predications from kinship theory and reciprocal altruism.

KW - Alibi witness

KW - Altruism

KW - Juror

KW - Kinship

KW - Testimony

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960349710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960349710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5

DO - 10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 20411316

AN - SCOPUS:79960349710

VL - 35

SP - 127

EP - 142

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 2

ER -