Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining

Dustin R. Slivka, Walther S. Hailes, John S. Cuddy, Brent C. Ruby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to impose a period of quantifiable intensified training to determine if commonly used diagnostic markers of overtraining parallel changes in physical performance and thus overtraining status. Eight trained male cyclists (24 ± 1 years, 71 ± 3 kg, V̇O2 peak= 4.5 ± 0.1·L·min-1) performed 21 days (3,211 km) of intensified training in the field where volume and intensity were increased over normal training. Salivary IgA, testosterone, and cortisol, 1-hour time trial performance, heart rate response, and profile of mood states (POMS) were collected and analyzed throughout the 21-day training period. The POMS category vigor declined from day 1 to day 4 and remained lower throughout (p < 0.05). There were no other statistical changes in overtraining parameters. However, individuals who demonstrated 2 or more symptoms of overtraining at any point throughout the 21 days were considered symptomatic and had a lower (p < 0.05) V̇O2peak (4.2 ± 0.1·vs. 4.7 ± 0.1 L·min-1) and lower (p < 0.05) average workload during the initial 1-hour time trial (253 ± 5 vs. 288 ± 14 W). Interestingly, the 1-hour time trial power in these individuals with symptoms of overtraining did not decline (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that markers of overtraining do not parallel a decrease in performance and should be interpreted with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2604-2612
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

Immunoglobulin A
Hydrocortisone
Heart Rate
1-testosterone

Keywords

  • Cycling
  • Functional overreaching
  • Nonfunctional overreaching
  • Overreaching
  • Overtraining syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining. / Slivka, Dustin R.; Hailes, Walther S.; Cuddy, John S.; Ruby, Brent C.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 24, No. 10, 01.10.2010, p. 2604-2612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slivka, Dustin R. ; Hailes, Walther S. ; Cuddy, John S. ; Ruby, Brent C. / Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 10. pp. 2604-2612.
@article{252cee601ac045149979c5601ac9cd98,
title = "Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to impose a period of quantifiable intensified training to determine if commonly used diagnostic markers of overtraining parallel changes in physical performance and thus overtraining status. Eight trained male cyclists (24 ± 1 years, 71 ± 3 kg, V̇O2 peak= 4.5 ± 0.1·L·min-1) performed 21 days (3,211 km) of intensified training in the field where volume and intensity were increased over normal training. Salivary IgA, testosterone, and cortisol, 1-hour time trial performance, heart rate response, and profile of mood states (POMS) were collected and analyzed throughout the 21-day training period. The POMS category vigor declined from day 1 to day 4 and remained lower throughout (p < 0.05). There were no other statistical changes in overtraining parameters. However, individuals who demonstrated 2 or more symptoms of overtraining at any point throughout the 21 days were considered symptomatic and had a lower (p < 0.05) V̇O2peak (4.2 ± 0.1·vs. 4.7 ± 0.1 L·min-1) and lower (p < 0.05) average workload during the initial 1-hour time trial (253 ± 5 vs. 288 ± 14 W). Interestingly, the 1-hour time trial power in these individuals with symptoms of overtraining did not decline (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that markers of overtraining do not parallel a decrease in performance and should be interpreted with caution.",
keywords = "Cycling, Functional overreaching, Nonfunctional overreaching, Overreaching, Overtraining syndrome",
author = "Slivka, {Dustin R.} and Hailes, {Walther S.} and Cuddy, {John S.} and Ruby, {Brent C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8a4eb",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2604--2612",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of 21 days of intensified training on markers of overtraining

AU - Slivka, Dustin R.

AU - Hailes, Walther S.

AU - Cuddy, John S.

AU - Ruby, Brent C.

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to impose a period of quantifiable intensified training to determine if commonly used diagnostic markers of overtraining parallel changes in physical performance and thus overtraining status. Eight trained male cyclists (24 ± 1 years, 71 ± 3 kg, V̇O2 peak= 4.5 ± 0.1·L·min-1) performed 21 days (3,211 km) of intensified training in the field where volume and intensity were increased over normal training. Salivary IgA, testosterone, and cortisol, 1-hour time trial performance, heart rate response, and profile of mood states (POMS) were collected and analyzed throughout the 21-day training period. The POMS category vigor declined from day 1 to day 4 and remained lower throughout (p < 0.05). There were no other statistical changes in overtraining parameters. However, individuals who demonstrated 2 or more symptoms of overtraining at any point throughout the 21 days were considered symptomatic and had a lower (p < 0.05) V̇O2peak (4.2 ± 0.1·vs. 4.7 ± 0.1 L·min-1) and lower (p < 0.05) average workload during the initial 1-hour time trial (253 ± 5 vs. 288 ± 14 W). Interestingly, the 1-hour time trial power in these individuals with symptoms of overtraining did not decline (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that markers of overtraining do not parallel a decrease in performance and should be interpreted with caution.

AB - The purpose of this study was to impose a period of quantifiable intensified training to determine if commonly used diagnostic markers of overtraining parallel changes in physical performance and thus overtraining status. Eight trained male cyclists (24 ± 1 years, 71 ± 3 kg, V̇O2 peak= 4.5 ± 0.1·L·min-1) performed 21 days (3,211 km) of intensified training in the field where volume and intensity were increased over normal training. Salivary IgA, testosterone, and cortisol, 1-hour time trial performance, heart rate response, and profile of mood states (POMS) were collected and analyzed throughout the 21-day training period. The POMS category vigor declined from day 1 to day 4 and remained lower throughout (p < 0.05). There were no other statistical changes in overtraining parameters. However, individuals who demonstrated 2 or more symptoms of overtraining at any point throughout the 21 days were considered symptomatic and had a lower (p < 0.05) V̇O2peak (4.2 ± 0.1·vs. 4.7 ± 0.1 L·min-1) and lower (p < 0.05) average workload during the initial 1-hour time trial (253 ± 5 vs. 288 ± 14 W). Interestingly, the 1-hour time trial power in these individuals with symptoms of overtraining did not decline (p > 0.05). These data demonstrate that markers of overtraining do not parallel a decrease in performance and should be interpreted with caution.

KW - Cycling

KW - Functional overreaching

KW - Nonfunctional overreaching

KW - Overreaching

KW - Overtraining syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952276853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952276853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8a4eb

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8a4eb

M3 - Article

C2 - 20733522

AN - SCOPUS:79952276853

VL - 24

SP - 2604

EP - 2612

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 10

ER -