Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Marika M. Lehtola, Risto H. Rautiainen, Lesley M. Day, Eva Schonstein, Juha Suutarinen, Simo Salminen, Jos H. Verbeek

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study reviewed the effectiveness of interventions in preventing occupational injuries among workers in agriculture. Methods. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies assessing interventions aimed at preventing injuries among workers in agriculture were considered. MEDLINE and five other databases were searched up to June 2006. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies and the methodological quality of the ones included. Randomized controlled trials were combined in a meta-analysis. Interrupted time-series studies were reanalyzed to assess the immediate and progressive effect on injuries. Results. Five randomized controlled trials and three interrupted time-series studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated educational interventions and financial incentives, and two studies evaluated the effect of legislation. Three randomized controlled trials on educational interventions with 4670 adult participants did not indicate any injury-reducing effect, with a rate ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.20), nor did two randomized controlled trials among children (6895 participants). Financial incentives decreased the injury level immediately after the intervention in one interrupted time-series study. Banning endosulfan pesticide in Sri Lanka led to a significant decrease in the trend of poisonings over time. Legislation requiring reliever protective structures on all tractors in Sweden did not produce a reduction in injuries, but the same requirement for new tractors was associated with a decrease in fatal injuries. Conclusions. The reviewed studies provided no evidence that educational interventions are effective in decreasing injury rates among agricultural workers. Financial incentives may be a better means of reducing injury rates. Banning highly toxic pesticides may be effective. Legislation on safety devices on tractors yielded contradictory results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-336
Number of pages10
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Agriculture
Meta-Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials
Legislation
Motivation
Pesticides
Endosulfan
Protective Devices
Occupational Injuries
Sri Lanka
Poisons
Sweden
MEDLINE
Poisoning
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Keywords

  • Data pooling
  • Evaluation research
  • Intervention study
  • Occupafional accident
  • Preventive measure
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture - A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Lehtola, Marika M.; Rautiainen, Risto H.; Day, Lesley M.; Schonstein, Eva; Suutarinen, Juha; Salminen, Simo; Verbeek, Jos H.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Vol. 34, No. 5, 10.2008, p. 327-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lehtola, Marika M. ; Rautiainen, Risto H. ; Day, Lesley M. ; Schonstein, Eva ; Suutarinen, Juha ; Salminen, Simo ; Verbeek, Jos H. / Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture - A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 5. pp. 327-336.
@article{5f4ce7a813b34c528373db83d6058665,
title = "Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture - A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objectives. This study reviewed the effectiveness of interventions in preventing occupational injuries among workers in agriculture. Methods. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies assessing interventions aimed at preventing injuries among workers in agriculture were considered. MEDLINE and five other databases were searched up to June 2006. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies and the methodological quality of the ones included. Randomized controlled trials were combined in a meta-analysis. Interrupted time-series studies were reanalyzed to assess the immediate and progressive effect on injuries. Results. Five randomized controlled trials and three interrupted time-series studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated educational interventions and financial incentives, and two studies evaluated the effect of legislation. Three randomized controlled trials on educational interventions with 4670 adult participants did not indicate any injury-reducing effect, with a rate ratio of 1.02 (95{\%} confidence interval 0.87-1.20), nor did two randomized controlled trials among children (6895 participants). Financial incentives decreased the injury level immediately after the intervention in one interrupted time-series study. Banning endosulfan pesticide in Sri Lanka led to a significant decrease in the trend of poisonings over time. Legislation requiring reliever protective structures on all tractors in Sweden did not produce a reduction in injuries, but the same requirement for new tractors was associated with a decrease in fatal injuries. Conclusions. The reviewed studies provided no evidence that educational interventions are effective in decreasing injury rates among agricultural workers. Financial incentives may be a better means of reducing injury rates. Banning highly toxic pesticides may be effective. Legislation on safety devices on tractors yielded contradictory results.",
keywords = "Data pooling, Evaluation research, Intervention study, Occupafional accident, Preventive measure, Randomized controlled trial, Systematic review",
author = "Lehtola, {Marika M.} and Rautiainen, {Risto H.} and Day, {Lesley M.} and Eva Schonstein and Juha Suutarinen and Simo Salminen and Verbeek, {Jos H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.5271/sjweh.1279",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "327--336",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health",
issn = "0355-3140",
publisher = "Finnish Institute of Occupational Health",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Lehtola, Marika M.

AU - Rautiainen, Risto H.

AU - Day, Lesley M.

AU - Schonstein, Eva

AU - Suutarinen, Juha

AU - Salminen, Simo

AU - Verbeek, Jos H.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Objectives. This study reviewed the effectiveness of interventions in preventing occupational injuries among workers in agriculture. Methods. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies assessing interventions aimed at preventing injuries among workers in agriculture were considered. MEDLINE and five other databases were searched up to June 2006. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies and the methodological quality of the ones included. Randomized controlled trials were combined in a meta-analysis. Interrupted time-series studies were reanalyzed to assess the immediate and progressive effect on injuries. Results. Five randomized controlled trials and three interrupted time-series studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated educational interventions and financial incentives, and two studies evaluated the effect of legislation. Three randomized controlled trials on educational interventions with 4670 adult participants did not indicate any injury-reducing effect, with a rate ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.20), nor did two randomized controlled trials among children (6895 participants). Financial incentives decreased the injury level immediately after the intervention in one interrupted time-series study. Banning endosulfan pesticide in Sri Lanka led to a significant decrease in the trend of poisonings over time. Legislation requiring reliever protective structures on all tractors in Sweden did not produce a reduction in injuries, but the same requirement for new tractors was associated with a decrease in fatal injuries. Conclusions. The reviewed studies provided no evidence that educational interventions are effective in decreasing injury rates among agricultural workers. Financial incentives may be a better means of reducing injury rates. Banning highly toxic pesticides may be effective. Legislation on safety devices on tractors yielded contradictory results.

AB - Objectives. This study reviewed the effectiveness of interventions in preventing occupational injuries among workers in agriculture. Methods. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time-series studies assessing interventions aimed at preventing injuries among workers in agriculture were considered. MEDLINE and five other databases were searched up to June 2006. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of studies and the methodological quality of the ones included. Randomized controlled trials were combined in a meta-analysis. Interrupted time-series studies were reanalyzed to assess the immediate and progressive effect on injuries. Results. Five randomized controlled trials and three interrupted time-series studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies evaluated educational interventions and financial incentives, and two studies evaluated the effect of legislation. Three randomized controlled trials on educational interventions with 4670 adult participants did not indicate any injury-reducing effect, with a rate ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.20), nor did two randomized controlled trials among children (6895 participants). Financial incentives decreased the injury level immediately after the intervention in one interrupted time-series study. Banning endosulfan pesticide in Sri Lanka led to a significant decrease in the trend of poisonings over time. Legislation requiring reliever protective structures on all tractors in Sweden did not produce a reduction in injuries, but the same requirement for new tractors was associated with a decrease in fatal injuries. Conclusions. The reviewed studies provided no evidence that educational interventions are effective in decreasing injury rates among agricultural workers. Financial incentives may be a better means of reducing injury rates. Banning highly toxic pesticides may be effective. Legislation on safety devices on tractors yielded contradictory results.

KW - Data pooling

KW - Evaluation research

KW - Intervention study

KW - Occupafional accident

KW - Preventive measure

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56249109799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56249109799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.1279

DO - 10.5271/sjweh.1279

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18853066

AN - SCOPUS:56249109799

VL - 34

SP - 327

EP - 336

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

SN - 0355-3140

IS - 5

ER -