Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers

J. Appiah, B. Naik, R. Wojtal, Laurence R Rilett

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Advance detection (AD) is a common method of providing dilemma zone protection at high-speed signalized intersections. AD systems enable approaching vehicles to extend the green and prevent the onset of yellow while they are in the dilemma zone. However, AD systems could be counterproductive as they tend to increase the likelihood that the green will be extended until it reaches the maximum allowable at which point it transitions immediately to yellow (max-out) such that any dilemma zone protection is lost. Consequently, the Nebraska department of roads (NDOR) developed a new system that combines AD and advance warning (AW) systems to reduce the frequency of loss of dilemma zone protection due to max-out, thereby improving efficiency without unnecessarily compromising intersection safety. A number of states have adopted similar systems; however, the operating algorithm is unique to Nebraska. Currently NDOR has implemented thirty eight combined AD-AW systems around the state. While these have received many favourable comments, especially from truck drivers, there has been no comprehensive analysis of their safety effectiveness. This paper examines the actuated advance warning system in Nebraska with respect to safety. Crash records from before and after the implementation of the system are compared. In addition control intersections are used to compare crash rates over time using a Bayesian technique to ensure that no exogenous variables affect the results. Results of the analysis are encouraging (a crash reduction rate of 0.384) and suggest that the use of AD systems in conjunction with AWS systems should be encouraged as effective safety treatments for high-speed signalized intersections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAnnual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010
Pages1626-1633
Number of pages8
StatePublished - Dec 28 2010
EventAnnual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010 - Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Duration: Jun 9 2010Jun 12 2010

Publication series

NameProceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
Volume2

Other

OtherAnnual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010
CountryCanada
CityWinnipeg, MB
Period6/9/106/12/10

Fingerprint

Alarm systems
Truck drivers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Appiah, J., Naik, B., Wojtal, R., & Rilett, L. R. (2010). Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers. In Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010 (pp. 1626-1633). (Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; Vol. 2).

Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers. / Appiah, J.; Naik, B.; Wojtal, R.; Rilett, Laurence R.

Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010. 2010. p. 1626-1633 (Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; Vol. 2).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Appiah, J, Naik, B, Wojtal, R & Rilett, LR 2010, Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers. in Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010. Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 1626-1633, Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 6/9/10.
Appiah J, Naik B, Wojtal R, Rilett LR. Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers. In Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010. 2010. p. 1626-1633. (Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering).
Appiah, J. ; Naik, B. ; Wojtal, R. ; Rilett, Laurence R. / Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers. Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010. 2010. pp. 1626-1633 (Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering).
@inproceedings{99a603f1689747829bd3cbe316b8c6ba,
title = "Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers",
abstract = "Advance detection (AD) is a common method of providing dilemma zone protection at high-speed signalized intersections. AD systems enable approaching vehicles to extend the green and prevent the onset of yellow while they are in the dilemma zone. However, AD systems could be counterproductive as they tend to increase the likelihood that the green will be extended until it reaches the maximum allowable at which point it transitions immediately to yellow (max-out) such that any dilemma zone protection is lost. Consequently, the Nebraska department of roads (NDOR) developed a new system that combines AD and advance warning (AW) systems to reduce the frequency of loss of dilemma zone protection due to max-out, thereby improving efficiency without unnecessarily compromising intersection safety. A number of states have adopted similar systems; however, the operating algorithm is unique to Nebraska. Currently NDOR has implemented thirty eight combined AD-AW systems around the state. While these have received many favourable comments, especially from truck drivers, there has been no comprehensive analysis of their safety effectiveness. This paper examines the actuated advance warning system in Nebraska with respect to safety. Crash records from before and after the implementation of the system are compared. In addition control intersections are used to compare crash rates over time using a Bayesian technique to ensure that no exogenous variables affect the results. Results of the analysis are encouraging (a crash reduction rate of 0.384) and suggest that the use of AD systems in conjunction with AWS systems should be encouraged as effective safety treatments for high-speed signalized intersections.",
author = "J. Appiah and B. Naik and R. Wojtal and Rilett, {Laurence R}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "28",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781617389061",
series = "Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering",
pages = "1626--1633",
booktitle = "Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Effectiveness of combined advance detection and advance warning flashers

AU - Appiah, J.

AU - Naik, B.

AU - Wojtal, R.

AU - Rilett, Laurence R

PY - 2010/12/28

Y1 - 2010/12/28

N2 - Advance detection (AD) is a common method of providing dilemma zone protection at high-speed signalized intersections. AD systems enable approaching vehicles to extend the green and prevent the onset of yellow while they are in the dilemma zone. However, AD systems could be counterproductive as they tend to increase the likelihood that the green will be extended until it reaches the maximum allowable at which point it transitions immediately to yellow (max-out) such that any dilemma zone protection is lost. Consequently, the Nebraska department of roads (NDOR) developed a new system that combines AD and advance warning (AW) systems to reduce the frequency of loss of dilemma zone protection due to max-out, thereby improving efficiency without unnecessarily compromising intersection safety. A number of states have adopted similar systems; however, the operating algorithm is unique to Nebraska. Currently NDOR has implemented thirty eight combined AD-AW systems around the state. While these have received many favourable comments, especially from truck drivers, there has been no comprehensive analysis of their safety effectiveness. This paper examines the actuated advance warning system in Nebraska with respect to safety. Crash records from before and after the implementation of the system are compared. In addition control intersections are used to compare crash rates over time using a Bayesian technique to ensure that no exogenous variables affect the results. Results of the analysis are encouraging (a crash reduction rate of 0.384) and suggest that the use of AD systems in conjunction with AWS systems should be encouraged as effective safety treatments for high-speed signalized intersections.

AB - Advance detection (AD) is a common method of providing dilemma zone protection at high-speed signalized intersections. AD systems enable approaching vehicles to extend the green and prevent the onset of yellow while they are in the dilemma zone. However, AD systems could be counterproductive as they tend to increase the likelihood that the green will be extended until it reaches the maximum allowable at which point it transitions immediately to yellow (max-out) such that any dilemma zone protection is lost. Consequently, the Nebraska department of roads (NDOR) developed a new system that combines AD and advance warning (AW) systems to reduce the frequency of loss of dilemma zone protection due to max-out, thereby improving efficiency without unnecessarily compromising intersection safety. A number of states have adopted similar systems; however, the operating algorithm is unique to Nebraska. Currently NDOR has implemented thirty eight combined AD-AW systems around the state. While these have received many favourable comments, especially from truck drivers, there has been no comprehensive analysis of their safety effectiveness. This paper examines the actuated advance warning system in Nebraska with respect to safety. Crash records from before and after the implementation of the system are compared. In addition control intersections are used to compare crash rates over time using a Bayesian technique to ensure that no exogenous variables affect the results. Results of the analysis are encouraging (a crash reduction rate of 0.384) and suggest that the use of AD systems in conjunction with AWS systems should be encouraged as effective safety treatments for high-speed signalized intersections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650467097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650467097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781617389061

T3 - Proceedings, Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

SP - 1626

EP - 1633

BT - Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 2010, CSCE 2010

ER -