Effect of Testing Configuration in Semi-Circular Bending Fracture of Asphalt Mixtures: Experiments and Statistical Analyses

Gabriel Nsengiyumva, Yong Rak Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is a simple, efficient, and easily applicable method in the pavement community to characterize fracture behavior. This makes it widely used as a quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) approach at several transportation agencies. However, public–private testing laboratories have implemented SCB test methods using different load-support fixture conditions with an insufficient understanding of how the conditions affect the results and testing variability. This could be particularly problematic when using SCB test results obtained from different load-support fixtures as QC–QA (or pass/fail) purposes. This study investigated the effect of SCB testing configurations on test results and their variability by conducting tests using six different load-support fixtures. Several fracture-related indicators such as fracture energy, flexibility index, peak load, and the coefficient of the cracking index resulting from the six different load-support fixtures were compared. Test results and statistical analyses showed that SCB tests generally showed repeatable results, whereas load-support fixtures can affect test results and their repeatability, thus care should be taken when choosing a testing fixture. The addition of roller springs generally increased the variability of the test results. It appears that the mid-span jig was detrimental to testing repeatability, and friction at the support should be avoided because it can erroneously increase fracture resistance with a higher variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-328
Number of pages9
JournalTransportation Research Record
Volume2673
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Asphalt mixtures
Bending tests
Testing
Experiments
Jigs
Fracture energy
Quality assurance
Pavements
Quality control
Fracture toughness
Friction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Effect of Testing Configuration in Semi-Circular Bending Fracture of Asphalt Mixtures : Experiments and Statistical Analyses. / Nsengiyumva, Gabriel; Kim, Yong Rak.

In: Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2673, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 320-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{455f696886114689a10de55325dd8b34,
title = "Effect of Testing Configuration in Semi-Circular Bending Fracture of Asphalt Mixtures: Experiments and Statistical Analyses",
abstract = "The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is a simple, efficient, and easily applicable method in the pavement community to characterize fracture behavior. This makes it widely used as a quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) approach at several transportation agencies. However, public–private testing laboratories have implemented SCB test methods using different load-support fixture conditions with an insufficient understanding of how the conditions affect the results and testing variability. This could be particularly problematic when using SCB test results obtained from different load-support fixtures as QC–QA (or pass/fail) purposes. This study investigated the effect of SCB testing configurations on test results and their variability by conducting tests using six different load-support fixtures. Several fracture-related indicators such as fracture energy, flexibility index, peak load, and the coefficient of the cracking index resulting from the six different load-support fixtures were compared. Test results and statistical analyses showed that SCB tests generally showed repeatable results, whereas load-support fixtures can affect test results and their repeatability, thus care should be taken when choosing a testing fixture. The addition of roller springs generally increased the variability of the test results. It appears that the mid-span jig was detrimental to testing repeatability, and friction at the support should be avoided because it can erroneously increase fracture resistance with a higher variability.",
author = "Gabriel Nsengiyumva and Kim, {Yong Rak}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361198119839343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2673",
pages = "320--328",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Testing Configuration in Semi-Circular Bending Fracture of Asphalt Mixtures

T2 - Experiments and Statistical Analyses

AU - Nsengiyumva, Gabriel

AU - Kim, Yong Rak

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is a simple, efficient, and easily applicable method in the pavement community to characterize fracture behavior. This makes it widely used as a quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) approach at several transportation agencies. However, public–private testing laboratories have implemented SCB test methods using different load-support fixture conditions with an insufficient understanding of how the conditions affect the results and testing variability. This could be particularly problematic when using SCB test results obtained from different load-support fixtures as QC–QA (or pass/fail) purposes. This study investigated the effect of SCB testing configurations on test results and their variability by conducting tests using six different load-support fixtures. Several fracture-related indicators such as fracture energy, flexibility index, peak load, and the coefficient of the cracking index resulting from the six different load-support fixtures were compared. Test results and statistical analyses showed that SCB tests generally showed repeatable results, whereas load-support fixtures can affect test results and their repeatability, thus care should be taken when choosing a testing fixture. The addition of roller springs generally increased the variability of the test results. It appears that the mid-span jig was detrimental to testing repeatability, and friction at the support should be avoided because it can erroneously increase fracture resistance with a higher variability.

AB - The semi-circular bending (SCB) test is a simple, efficient, and easily applicable method in the pavement community to characterize fracture behavior. This makes it widely used as a quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) approach at several transportation agencies. However, public–private testing laboratories have implemented SCB test methods using different load-support fixture conditions with an insufficient understanding of how the conditions affect the results and testing variability. This could be particularly problematic when using SCB test results obtained from different load-support fixtures as QC–QA (or pass/fail) purposes. This study investigated the effect of SCB testing configurations on test results and their variability by conducting tests using six different load-support fixtures. Several fracture-related indicators such as fracture energy, flexibility index, peak load, and the coefficient of the cracking index resulting from the six different load-support fixtures were compared. Test results and statistical analyses showed that SCB tests generally showed repeatable results, whereas load-support fixtures can affect test results and their repeatability, thus care should be taken when choosing a testing fixture. The addition of roller springs generally increased the variability of the test results. It appears that the mid-span jig was detrimental to testing repeatability, and friction at the support should be avoided because it can erroneously increase fracture resistance with a higher variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064199748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064199748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361198119839343

DO - 10.1177/0361198119839343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064199748

VL - 2673

SP - 320

EP - 328

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 5

ER -