Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-up Training on Muscle Strength and Thickness

Christopher J. Kotarsky, Bryan K. Christensen, Jason S. Miller, Kyle J Hackney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Kotarsky, CJ, Christensen, BK, Miller, JS, and Hackney, KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 651-659, 2018-Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) is comparable with traditional bench press training (BENCH) as a technique for increasing muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained men (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to PUSH (n = 14) and BENCH (n = 9) groups and were trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Muscle thickness (MT), seated medicine ball put (MBP), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press, and push-up progression (PUP) were measured before and after training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.001) and PUP (p < 0.001) for both groups after training. The increase in PUP was significantly greater for PUSH (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found within groups for MT and MBP (p > 0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate that calisthenics, using different progressive variations to maintain strength training programming variables, can improve upper-body muscle strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-659
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gymnastics
Muscle Strength
Resistance Training
Medicine
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-up Training on Muscle Strength and Thickness. / Kotarsky, Christopher J.; Christensen, Bryan K.; Miller, Jason S.; Hackney, Kyle J.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 651-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kotarsky, Christopher J. ; Christensen, Bryan K. ; Miller, Jason S. ; Hackney, Kyle J. / Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-up Training on Muscle Strength and Thickness. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 651-659.
@article{671a6a14de514ee5972cc795f7fbfd80,
title = "Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-up Training on Muscle Strength and Thickness",
abstract = "Kotarsky, CJ, Christensen, BK, Miller, JS, and Hackney, KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 651-659, 2018-Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) is comparable with traditional bench press training (BENCH) as a technique for increasing muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained men (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to PUSH (n = 14) and BENCH (n = 9) groups and were trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Muscle thickness (MT), seated medicine ball put (MBP), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press, and push-up progression (PUP) were measured before and after training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.001) and PUP (p < 0.001) for both groups after training. The increase in PUP was significantly greater for PUSH (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found within groups for MT and MBP (p > 0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate that calisthenics, using different progressive variations to maintain strength training programming variables, can improve upper-body muscle strength.",
author = "Kotarsky, {Christopher J.} and Christensen, {Bryan K.} and Miller, {Jason S.} and Hackney, {Kyle J}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0000000000002345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "651--659",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-up Training on Muscle Strength and Thickness

AU - Kotarsky, Christopher J.

AU - Christensen, Bryan K.

AU - Miller, Jason S.

AU - Hackney, Kyle J

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Kotarsky, CJ, Christensen, BK, Miller, JS, and Hackney, KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 651-659, 2018-Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) is comparable with traditional bench press training (BENCH) as a technique for increasing muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained men (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to PUSH (n = 14) and BENCH (n = 9) groups and were trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Muscle thickness (MT), seated medicine ball put (MBP), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press, and push-up progression (PUP) were measured before and after training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.001) and PUP (p < 0.001) for both groups after training. The increase in PUP was significantly greater for PUSH (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found within groups for MT and MBP (p > 0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate that calisthenics, using different progressive variations to maintain strength training programming variables, can improve upper-body muscle strength.

AB - Kotarsky, CJ, Christensen, BK, Miller, JS, and Hackney, KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 32(3): 651-659, 2018-Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine whether progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) is comparable with traditional bench press training (BENCH) as a technique for increasing muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained men (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) completed the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to PUSH (n = 14) and BENCH (n = 9) groups and were trained 3 days per week for 4 weeks. Muscle thickness (MT), seated medicine ball put (MBP), 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press, and push-up progression (PUP) were measured before and after training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.001) and PUP (p < 0.001) for both groups after training. The increase in PUP was significantly greater for PUSH (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found within groups for MT and MBP (p > 0.05). This study is the first to demonstrate that calisthenics, using different progressive variations to maintain strength training programming variables, can improve upper-body muscle strength.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050627663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050627663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002345

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002345

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 651

EP - 659

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 3

ER -