Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials

Jennifer M. Yentes, William Denton, John McCamley, Peter C. Raffalt, Kendra K Schmid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is sometimes difficult to obtain uninterrupted data sets that are long enough to perform nonlinear analysis, especially in pathological populations. It is currently unclear as to how many data points are needed for reliable entropy analysis. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of changing parameter values of m, r, and N on entropy calculations for long gait data sets using two different modes of walking (i.e., overground versus treadmill). Fourteen young adults walked overground and on a treadmill at their preferred walking speed for one-hour while step time was collected via heel switches. Approximate (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) were calculated using multiple parameter combinations of m, N, and r. Further, r was tested under two cases r*standard deviation and r constant. ApEn differed depending on the combination of r, m, and N. ApEn demonstrated relative consistency except when m = 2 and the smallest r values used (rSD = 0.015*SD, 0.20*SD; rConstant = 0 and 0.003). For SampEn, as r increased, SampEn decreased. When r was constant, SampEn demonstrated excellent relative consistency for all combinations of r, m, and N. When r constant was used, overground walking was more regular than treadmill. However, treadmill walking was found to be more regular when using rSD for both ApEn and SampEn. For greatest relative consistency of step time data, it was best to use a constant r value and SampEn. When using entropy, several r values must be examined and reported to ensure that results are not an artifact of parameter choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-134
Number of pages7
JournalGait and Posture
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Entropy
Walking
Heel
Gait
Artifacts
Young Adult

Keywords

  • Complexity
  • Gait
  • Locomotion
  • Predictability
  • Regularity
  • Treadmill

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials. / Yentes, Jennifer M.; Denton, William; McCamley, John; Raffalt, Peter C.; Schmid, Kendra K.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 60, 01.02.2018, p. 128-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yentes, Jennifer M. ; Denton, William ; McCamley, John ; Raffalt, Peter C. ; Schmid, Kendra K. / Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials. In: Gait and Posture. 2018 ; Vol. 60. pp. 128-134.
@article{310536ce79f9417d904826d0a17dbfe6,
title = "Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials",
abstract = "It is sometimes difficult to obtain uninterrupted data sets that are long enough to perform nonlinear analysis, especially in pathological populations. It is currently unclear as to how many data points are needed for reliable entropy analysis. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of changing parameter values of m, r, and N on entropy calculations for long gait data sets using two different modes of walking (i.e., overground versus treadmill). Fourteen young adults walked overground and on a treadmill at their preferred walking speed for one-hour while step time was collected via heel switches. Approximate (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) were calculated using multiple parameter combinations of m, N, and r. Further, r was tested under two cases r*standard deviation and r constant. ApEn differed depending on the combination of r, m, and N. ApEn demonstrated relative consistency except when m = 2 and the smallest r values used (rSD = 0.015*SD, 0.20*SD; rConstant = 0 and 0.003). For SampEn, as r increased, SampEn decreased. When r was constant, SampEn demonstrated excellent relative consistency for all combinations of r, m, and N. When r constant was used, overground walking was more regular than treadmill. However, treadmill walking was found to be more regular when using rSD for both ApEn and SampEn. For greatest relative consistency of step time data, it was best to use a constant r value and SampEn. When using entropy, several r values must be examined and reported to ensure that results are not an artifact of parameter choice.",
keywords = "Complexity, Gait, Locomotion, Predictability, Regularity, Treadmill",
author = "Yentes, {Jennifer M.} and William Denton and John McCamley and Raffalt, {Peter C.} and Schmid, {Kendra K}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "128--134",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials

AU - Yentes, Jennifer M.

AU - Denton, William

AU - McCamley, John

AU - Raffalt, Peter C.

AU - Schmid, Kendra K

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - It is sometimes difficult to obtain uninterrupted data sets that are long enough to perform nonlinear analysis, especially in pathological populations. It is currently unclear as to how many data points are needed for reliable entropy analysis. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of changing parameter values of m, r, and N on entropy calculations for long gait data sets using two different modes of walking (i.e., overground versus treadmill). Fourteen young adults walked overground and on a treadmill at their preferred walking speed for one-hour while step time was collected via heel switches. Approximate (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) were calculated using multiple parameter combinations of m, N, and r. Further, r was tested under two cases r*standard deviation and r constant. ApEn differed depending on the combination of r, m, and N. ApEn demonstrated relative consistency except when m = 2 and the smallest r values used (rSD = 0.015*SD, 0.20*SD; rConstant = 0 and 0.003). For SampEn, as r increased, SampEn decreased. When r was constant, SampEn demonstrated excellent relative consistency for all combinations of r, m, and N. When r constant was used, overground walking was more regular than treadmill. However, treadmill walking was found to be more regular when using rSD for both ApEn and SampEn. For greatest relative consistency of step time data, it was best to use a constant r value and SampEn. When using entropy, several r values must be examined and reported to ensure that results are not an artifact of parameter choice.

AB - It is sometimes difficult to obtain uninterrupted data sets that are long enough to perform nonlinear analysis, especially in pathological populations. It is currently unclear as to how many data points are needed for reliable entropy analysis. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of changing parameter values of m, r, and N on entropy calculations for long gait data sets using two different modes of walking (i.e., overground versus treadmill). Fourteen young adults walked overground and on a treadmill at their preferred walking speed for one-hour while step time was collected via heel switches. Approximate (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) were calculated using multiple parameter combinations of m, N, and r. Further, r was tested under two cases r*standard deviation and r constant. ApEn differed depending on the combination of r, m, and N. ApEn demonstrated relative consistency except when m = 2 and the smallest r values used (rSD = 0.015*SD, 0.20*SD; rConstant = 0 and 0.003). For SampEn, as r increased, SampEn decreased. When r was constant, SampEn demonstrated excellent relative consistency for all combinations of r, m, and N. When r constant was used, overground walking was more regular than treadmill. However, treadmill walking was found to be more regular when using rSD for both ApEn and SampEn. For greatest relative consistency of step time data, it was best to use a constant r value and SampEn. When using entropy, several r values must be examined and reported to ensure that results are not an artifact of parameter choice.

KW - Complexity

KW - Gait

KW - Locomotion

KW - Predictability

KW - Regularity

KW - Treadmill

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036569037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036569037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.023

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.023

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 128

EP - 134

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -