Effect of lectures and increased experience in gastroenterology on examination scores of internal medicine residents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of a lecture series and of varying clinical experience on resident performance on a written examination in gastroenterology (GI) were measured. Twenty-four internal medicine residents attended 40 one-hour lectures in GI over a 1-mo period and took a multiple choice examination before and 3 wk after the course. Mean scores increased < 10% after the lecture series. Residents who had taken a 2-mo elective in GI (n = 15) valued it highly as an educational experience, but scored no differently on the examination than those who had not. There was no significant difference in pretest scores based on year of residency. On a similar examination in cardiology, the score of 17 residents who had taken a 2-mo cardiology rotation was identical to that of 12 who had not. The impression of residents of a major gain in knowledge after subspecialty rotation was not confirmed by the objective testing employed. Scores of third-year residents did not differ greatly from those of first-year residents, suggesting that gains in some areas of clinical competence are not measured by this method of testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-604
Number of pages4
JournalGastroenterology
Volume80
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1981

Fingerprint

Gastroenterology
Internal Medicine
Cardiology
Clinical Competence
Internship and Residency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{01885f05db6749c7a763d50a816fb378,
title = "Effect of lectures and increased experience in gastroenterology on examination scores of internal medicine residents",
abstract = "The effect of a lecture series and of varying clinical experience on resident performance on a written examination in gastroenterology (GI) were measured. Twenty-four internal medicine residents attended 40 one-hour lectures in GI over a 1-mo period and took a multiple choice examination before and 3 wk after the course. Mean scores increased < 10{\%} after the lecture series. Residents who had taken a 2-mo elective in GI (n = 15) valued it highly as an educational experience, but scored no differently on the examination than those who had not. There was no significant difference in pretest scores based on year of residency. On a similar examination in cardiology, the score of 17 residents who had taken a 2-mo cardiology rotation was identical to that of 12 who had not. The impression of residents of a major gain in knowledge after subspecialty rotation was not confirmed by the objective testing employed. Scores of third-year residents did not differ greatly from those of first-year residents, suggesting that gains in some areas of clinical competence are not measured by this method of testing.",
author = "Wigton, {Robert Swift}",
year = "1981",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "601--604",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of lectures and increased experience in gastroenterology on examination scores of internal medicine residents

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

PY - 1981/3

Y1 - 1981/3

N2 - The effect of a lecture series and of varying clinical experience on resident performance on a written examination in gastroenterology (GI) were measured. Twenty-four internal medicine residents attended 40 one-hour lectures in GI over a 1-mo period and took a multiple choice examination before and 3 wk after the course. Mean scores increased < 10% after the lecture series. Residents who had taken a 2-mo elective in GI (n = 15) valued it highly as an educational experience, but scored no differently on the examination than those who had not. There was no significant difference in pretest scores based on year of residency. On a similar examination in cardiology, the score of 17 residents who had taken a 2-mo cardiology rotation was identical to that of 12 who had not. The impression of residents of a major gain in knowledge after subspecialty rotation was not confirmed by the objective testing employed. Scores of third-year residents did not differ greatly from those of first-year residents, suggesting that gains in some areas of clinical competence are not measured by this method of testing.

AB - The effect of a lecture series and of varying clinical experience on resident performance on a written examination in gastroenterology (GI) were measured. Twenty-four internal medicine residents attended 40 one-hour lectures in GI over a 1-mo period and took a multiple choice examination before and 3 wk after the course. Mean scores increased < 10% after the lecture series. Residents who had taken a 2-mo elective in GI (n = 15) valued it highly as an educational experience, but scored no differently on the examination than those who had not. There was no significant difference in pretest scores based on year of residency. On a similar examination in cardiology, the score of 17 residents who had taken a 2-mo cardiology rotation was identical to that of 12 who had not. The impression of residents of a major gain in knowledge after subspecialty rotation was not confirmed by the objective testing employed. Scores of third-year residents did not differ greatly from those of first-year residents, suggesting that gains in some areas of clinical competence are not measured by this method of testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019545426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019545426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7450452

AN - SCOPUS:0019545426

VL - 80

SP - 601

EP - 604

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 3

ER -