Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations

Barry M. Owens, William W. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different insertion techniques and adhesive systems on microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight human molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). Standardized mixed Class V cavities (enamel and dentin margins) were prepared at the CEJ. A total-etch (Adper Scotchbond MultiPurpose) and a self-etching (iBond) adhesive system were evaluated using either an incremental or single-step (bulk) insertion technique. The preparations were restored with Esthet•X micromatrix hybrid composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1000 cycles, immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h, and invested in acrylic resin. The specimen blocks were then sectioned longitudinally, with dye penetration (microleakage) examined with a 20X binocular microscope. Enamel and dentin margins were scored separately for microleakage using an ordinal ranking system. Results were analyzed using non-parametric tests at a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significance was exhibited between the groups (adhesive material/insertion technique) at the coronal and apical margins. At the coronal margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group exhibited significantly less leakage than the other groups, while at the apical margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group showed significantly less leakage than the self-etching adhesive/bulk insertion group. Significantly less leakage was found at the coronal margins compared to the apical margins of the material/technique groups. Conclusion: The use of a total-etch adhesive system and incremental insertion of composite significantly reduced microleakage at the coronal and apical margins of Class V composite restorations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-308
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Adhesives
Dentin
Dental Enamel
Coloring Agents
Tooth Cervix
Acrylic Resins
Methylene Blue
Tooth

Keywords

  • Adhesives
  • Class V restoration
  • Composite resin
  • Microleakage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations. / Owens, Barry M.; Johnson, William W.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.12.2005, p. 303-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71c261a80e854e428b91ba5df911c0e7,
title = "Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different insertion techniques and adhesive systems on microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight human molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). Standardized mixed Class V cavities (enamel and dentin margins) were prepared at the CEJ. A total-etch (Adper Scotchbond MultiPurpose) and a self-etching (iBond) adhesive system were evaluated using either an incremental or single-step (bulk) insertion technique. The preparations were restored with Esthet•X micromatrix hybrid composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1000 cycles, immersed in 1{\%} methylene blue dye for 24 h, and invested in acrylic resin. The specimen blocks were then sectioned longitudinally, with dye penetration (microleakage) examined with a 20X binocular microscope. Enamel and dentin margins were scored separately for microleakage using an ordinal ranking system. Results were analyzed using non-parametric tests at a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significance was exhibited between the groups (adhesive material/insertion technique) at the coronal and apical margins. At the coronal margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group exhibited significantly less leakage than the other groups, while at the apical margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group showed significantly less leakage than the self-etching adhesive/bulk insertion group. Significantly less leakage was found at the coronal margins compared to the apical margins of the material/technique groups. Conclusion: The use of a total-etch adhesive system and incremental insertion of composite significantly reduced microleakage at the coronal and apical margins of Class V composite restorations.",
keywords = "Adhesives, Class V restoration, Composite resin, Microleakage",
author = "Owens, {Barry M.} and Johnson, {William W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "303--308",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations

AU - Owens, Barry M.

AU - Johnson, William W.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different insertion techniques and adhesive systems on microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight human molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). Standardized mixed Class V cavities (enamel and dentin margins) were prepared at the CEJ. A total-etch (Adper Scotchbond MultiPurpose) and a self-etching (iBond) adhesive system were evaluated using either an incremental or single-step (bulk) insertion technique. The preparations were restored with Esthet•X micromatrix hybrid composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1000 cycles, immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h, and invested in acrylic resin. The specimen blocks were then sectioned longitudinally, with dye penetration (microleakage) examined with a 20X binocular microscope. Enamel and dentin margins were scored separately for microleakage using an ordinal ranking system. Results were analyzed using non-parametric tests at a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significance was exhibited between the groups (adhesive material/insertion technique) at the coronal and apical margins. At the coronal margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group exhibited significantly less leakage than the other groups, while at the apical margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group showed significantly less leakage than the self-etching adhesive/bulk insertion group. Significantly less leakage was found at the coronal margins compared to the apical margins of the material/technique groups. Conclusion: The use of a total-etch adhesive system and incremental insertion of composite significantly reduced microleakage at the coronal and apical margins of Class V composite restorations.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different insertion techniques and adhesive systems on microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight human molars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 12). Standardized mixed Class V cavities (enamel and dentin margins) were prepared at the CEJ. A total-etch (Adper Scotchbond MultiPurpose) and a self-etching (iBond) adhesive system were evaluated using either an incremental or single-step (bulk) insertion technique. The preparations were restored with Esthet•X micromatrix hybrid composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1000 cycles, immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h, and invested in acrylic resin. The specimen blocks were then sectioned longitudinally, with dye penetration (microleakage) examined with a 20X binocular microscope. Enamel and dentin margins were scored separately for microleakage using an ordinal ranking system. Results were analyzed using non-parametric tests at a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results: Significance was exhibited between the groups (adhesive material/insertion technique) at the coronal and apical margins. At the coronal margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group exhibited significantly less leakage than the other groups, while at the apical margin, the total-etch adhesive/incremental insertion group showed significantly less leakage than the self-etching adhesive/bulk insertion group. Significantly less leakage was found at the coronal margins compared to the apical margins of the material/technique groups. Conclusion: The use of a total-etch adhesive system and incremental insertion of composite significantly reduced microleakage at the coronal and apical margins of Class V composite restorations.

KW - Adhesives

KW - Class V restoration

KW - Composite resin

KW - Microleakage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30044431643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30044431643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16430011

AN - SCOPUS:30044431643

VL - 7

SP - 303

EP - 308

JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 4

ER -