Effect of incision direction on refractive outcome after radial keratotomy

Gerald Flanagan, Perry S. Binder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radial keratotomy incisions can be made centripetally or centrifugally. The benefits and effects of both techniques have been disputed since American surgeons began performing RK in the late 1970s. We examined the RK database of a single surgeon to determine if incision direction was associated with refractive outcome. METHODS: Stepwise regression was employed to select the important predictors of refraction change in the population. In addition to incision direction, variables eligible for entry into the model were optic clear zone diameter, incision number, patient age, corneal curvature and planned incision depth. RESULTS: All variables except for planned incision depth and corneal power entered the model. CONCLUSIONS: The results were consistent with previous investigations that found incision number, optic clear zone diameter and patient age important predictors of outcome. We also found incision direction to be a significant predictive variable with centripetal incisions decreasing myopia 0.6 diopters more than centrifugal incisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume12
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radial Keratotomy
Myopia
Databases
Population
Direction compound
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Effect of incision direction on refractive outcome after radial keratotomy. / Flanagan, Gerald; Binder, Perry S.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{61ccd46bb8224ea8b8bb37f208752430,
title = "Effect of incision direction on refractive outcome after radial keratotomy",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Radial keratotomy incisions can be made centripetally or centrifugally. The benefits and effects of both techniques have been disputed since American surgeons began performing RK in the late 1970s. We examined the RK database of a single surgeon to determine if incision direction was associated with refractive outcome. METHODS: Stepwise regression was employed to select the important predictors of refraction change in the population. In addition to incision direction, variables eligible for entry into the model were optic clear zone diameter, incision number, patient age, corneal curvature and planned incision depth. RESULTS: All variables except for planned incision depth and corneal power entered the model. CONCLUSIONS: The results were consistent with previous investigations that found incision number, optic clear zone diameter and patient age important predictors of outcome. We also found incision direction to be a significant predictive variable with centripetal incisions decreasing myopia 0.6 diopters more than centrifugal incisions.",
author = "Gerald Flanagan and Binder, {Perry S.}",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0883-0444",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of incision direction on refractive outcome after radial keratotomy

AU - Flanagan, Gerald

AU - Binder, Perry S.

PY - 1996/2/1

Y1 - 1996/2/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Radial keratotomy incisions can be made centripetally or centrifugally. The benefits and effects of both techniques have been disputed since American surgeons began performing RK in the late 1970s. We examined the RK database of a single surgeon to determine if incision direction was associated with refractive outcome. METHODS: Stepwise regression was employed to select the important predictors of refraction change in the population. In addition to incision direction, variables eligible for entry into the model were optic clear zone diameter, incision number, patient age, corneal curvature and planned incision depth. RESULTS: All variables except for planned incision depth and corneal power entered the model. CONCLUSIONS: The results were consistent with previous investigations that found incision number, optic clear zone diameter and patient age important predictors of outcome. We also found incision direction to be a significant predictive variable with centripetal incisions decreasing myopia 0.6 diopters more than centrifugal incisions.

AB - PURPOSE: Radial keratotomy incisions can be made centripetally or centrifugally. The benefits and effects of both techniques have been disputed since American surgeons began performing RK in the late 1970s. We examined the RK database of a single surgeon to determine if incision direction was associated with refractive outcome. METHODS: Stepwise regression was employed to select the important predictors of refraction change in the population. In addition to incision direction, variables eligible for entry into the model were optic clear zone diameter, incision number, patient age, corneal curvature and planned incision depth. RESULTS: All variables except for planned incision depth and corneal power entered the model. CONCLUSIONS: The results were consistent with previous investigations that found incision number, optic clear zone diameter and patient age important predictors of outcome. We also found incision direction to be a significant predictive variable with centripetal incisions decreasing myopia 0.6 diopters more than centrifugal incisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030005747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030005747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 0883-0444

IS - 2

ER -