Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement

Deborah S. Cobb, John William Reinhardt, Marcos A. Vargas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the use of two HEMA-containing dentin desensitizing agents [Health-Dent Desensitizer with fluoride (H) or Gluma Desensitizer (G)], when applied at simulated "cavity preparation" and "cementation" appointments, affects the bond strength of lab processed resin composite restorations cemented to dentin. Materials and Methods: The occlusal surfaces of 70 teeth were ground flat to expose dentin and polished to 600 grit. Teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=10). The treatments were applied in two sessions in order to simulate cavity preparation and cementation appointments. Water (W) was applied as a control instead of a desensitizing agent. H or G were applied for 30 seconds with a rubbing motion (1) at preparation appointment (HW and GW), or (2) at cementation appointment, after etching (WH and WG), or (3) at both sessions (HH and GG). In the control group, water was applied at both sessions (WW). All-Bond 2 and Dual Cement were used according to manufacturers' instructions to cement pre-polymerized resin composite cylinders (4 mm diameter) to the dentin surfaces using a force of 1.0 MPa. Specimens were thermocycled 300x and tested in shear until failure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at α=0.05. Results: Mean bond strength and standard deviations are reported in MPa: GW=7.4 ± 6.0; WW=7.7 ± 5.8; HW=8.2 ± 4.3; WH=10.8 ± 6.2; GG=13.5 ± 6.0; HH = 13.8 ± 7.1; WG= 19.9 ± 8.8. There were no significant differences in bond strengths for GW, WW, HW, WH and GG. Shear bond strength for WG and HH was significantly higher than all groups except for GG. Results of this in vitro study indicate that the use of desensitizers at the preparation and/or cementation appointment does not interfere with bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-65
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of dentistry
Volume10
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 1 1997

Fingerprint

Resin Cements
Shear Strength
Cementation
Dentin
Appointments and Schedules
Composite Resins
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
Tooth
Water
Fluorides
Analysis of Variance
hydroxyethyl methacrylate
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement. / Cobb, Deborah S.; Reinhardt, John William; Vargas, Marcos A.

In: American journal of dentistry, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.12.1997, p. 62-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fdde21a7be84e79879302ce13062edb,
title = "Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether the use of two HEMA-containing dentin desensitizing agents [Health-Dent Desensitizer with fluoride (H) or Gluma Desensitizer (G)], when applied at simulated {"}cavity preparation{"} and {"}cementation{"} appointments, affects the bond strength of lab processed resin composite restorations cemented to dentin. Materials and Methods: The occlusal surfaces of 70 teeth were ground flat to expose dentin and polished to 600 grit. Teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=10). The treatments were applied in two sessions in order to simulate cavity preparation and cementation appointments. Water (W) was applied as a control instead of a desensitizing agent. H or G were applied for 30 seconds with a rubbing motion (1) at preparation appointment (HW and GW), or (2) at cementation appointment, after etching (WH and WG), or (3) at both sessions (HH and GG). In the control group, water was applied at both sessions (WW). All-Bond 2 and Dual Cement were used according to manufacturers' instructions to cement pre-polymerized resin composite cylinders (4 mm diameter) to the dentin surfaces using a force of 1.0 MPa. Specimens were thermocycled 300x and tested in shear until failure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at α=0.05. Results: Mean bond strength and standard deviations are reported in MPa: GW=7.4 ± 6.0; WW=7.7 ± 5.8; HW=8.2 ± 4.3; WH=10.8 ± 6.2; GG=13.5 ± 6.0; HH = 13.8 ± 7.1; WG= 19.9 ± 8.8. There were no significant differences in bond strengths for GW, WW, HW, WH and GG. Shear bond strength for WG and HH was significantly higher than all groups except for GG. Results of this in vitro study indicate that the use of desensitizers at the preparation and/or cementation appointment does not interfere with bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.",
author = "Cobb, {Deborah S.} and Reinhardt, {John William} and Vargas, {Marcos A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "62--65",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement

AU - Cobb, Deborah S.

AU - Reinhardt, John William

AU - Vargas, Marcos A.

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether the use of two HEMA-containing dentin desensitizing agents [Health-Dent Desensitizer with fluoride (H) or Gluma Desensitizer (G)], when applied at simulated "cavity preparation" and "cementation" appointments, affects the bond strength of lab processed resin composite restorations cemented to dentin. Materials and Methods: The occlusal surfaces of 70 teeth were ground flat to expose dentin and polished to 600 grit. Teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=10). The treatments were applied in two sessions in order to simulate cavity preparation and cementation appointments. Water (W) was applied as a control instead of a desensitizing agent. H or G were applied for 30 seconds with a rubbing motion (1) at preparation appointment (HW and GW), or (2) at cementation appointment, after etching (WH and WG), or (3) at both sessions (HH and GG). In the control group, water was applied at both sessions (WW). All-Bond 2 and Dual Cement were used according to manufacturers' instructions to cement pre-polymerized resin composite cylinders (4 mm diameter) to the dentin surfaces using a force of 1.0 MPa. Specimens were thermocycled 300x and tested in shear until failure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at α=0.05. Results: Mean bond strength and standard deviations are reported in MPa: GW=7.4 ± 6.0; WW=7.7 ± 5.8; HW=8.2 ± 4.3; WH=10.8 ± 6.2; GG=13.5 ± 6.0; HH = 13.8 ± 7.1; WG= 19.9 ± 8.8. There were no significant differences in bond strengths for GW, WW, HW, WH and GG. Shear bond strength for WG and HH was significantly higher than all groups except for GG. Results of this in vitro study indicate that the use of desensitizers at the preparation and/or cementation appointment does not interfere with bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether the use of two HEMA-containing dentin desensitizing agents [Health-Dent Desensitizer with fluoride (H) or Gluma Desensitizer (G)], when applied at simulated "cavity preparation" and "cementation" appointments, affects the bond strength of lab processed resin composite restorations cemented to dentin. Materials and Methods: The occlusal surfaces of 70 teeth were ground flat to expose dentin and polished to 600 grit. Teeth were randomly assigned to seven groups (n=10). The treatments were applied in two sessions in order to simulate cavity preparation and cementation appointments. Water (W) was applied as a control instead of a desensitizing agent. H or G were applied for 30 seconds with a rubbing motion (1) at preparation appointment (HW and GW), or (2) at cementation appointment, after etching (WH and WG), or (3) at both sessions (HH and GG). In the control group, water was applied at both sessions (WW). All-Bond 2 and Dual Cement were used according to manufacturers' instructions to cement pre-polymerized resin composite cylinders (4 mm diameter) to the dentin surfaces using a force of 1.0 MPa. Specimens were thermocycled 300x and tested in shear until failure. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at α=0.05. Results: Mean bond strength and standard deviations are reported in MPa: GW=7.4 ± 6.0; WW=7.7 ± 5.8; HW=8.2 ± 4.3; WH=10.8 ± 6.2; GG=13.5 ± 6.0; HH = 13.8 ± 7.1; WG= 19.9 ± 8.8. There were no significant differences in bond strengths for GW, WW, HW, WH and GG. Shear bond strength for WG and HH was significantly higher than all groups except for GG. Results of this in vitro study indicate that the use of desensitizers at the preparation and/or cementation appointment does not interfere with bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031108043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031108043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 62

EP - 65

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 2

ER -