Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool

Adriana Trejo, Myung Chul Jung, Dmitry Oleynikov, M. Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two laparoscopic tools, a scissor-type grasper and an ergonomically designed grasper, were compared in terms of operation efficiency and physical workload while inserting into a simulated abdomen and aiming five cross-shaped targets. Thirty right-handed novice participants performed the tasks with five tool-grasping hand postures at two computer monitor angles that simulated reaching an organ during laparoscopic surgery. When comparing the two free style hand postures used, there was a significant improvement in operation efficiency. This demonstrated that the participants quickly became familiar with the Intuitool by finding new hand postures that will significantly help them reach the target faster and more accurately. The 45{ring operator} monitor angle showed the worst accuracy and deviation, the 0{ring operator} monitor angle showed the best accuracy and smallest deviation with the upper target. Thus it is recommended that the camera trocar be placed directly above the organ of interest, and the part of the organ to be reached should be displayed slightly above the center of the feedback monitor. For physical workload, the method of gripping the tools was the most important factor. The scissors-type tool caused the largest wrist flexion, in contrast both free styles hand postures with the Intuitool showed the least wrist flexion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)745-753
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Posture
Hand
Workload
Wrist
workload
Computer monitors
Hand tools
efficiency
Surgery
Cameras
Surgical Instruments
Abdomen
Laparoscopy
surgery
Feedback

Keywords

  • Aiming with long stylus
  • Ergonomic tool design
  • Insertion of tool
  • Laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool. / Trejo, Adriana; Jung, Myung Chul; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Hallbeck, M. Susan.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.01.2007, p. 745-753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trejo, Adriana ; Jung, Myung Chul ; Oleynikov, Dmitry ; Hallbeck, M. Susan. / Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2007 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 745-753.
@article{66aaaaa2b6a043b9be4f1d6335d1299d,
title = "Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool",
abstract = "Two laparoscopic tools, a scissor-type grasper and an ergonomically designed grasper, were compared in terms of operation efficiency and physical workload while inserting into a simulated abdomen and aiming five cross-shaped targets. Thirty right-handed novice participants performed the tasks with five tool-grasping hand postures at two computer monitor angles that simulated reaching an organ during laparoscopic surgery. When comparing the two free style hand postures used, there was a significant improvement in operation efficiency. This demonstrated that the participants quickly became familiar with the Intuitool by finding new hand postures that will significantly help them reach the target faster and more accurately. The 45{ring operator} monitor angle showed the worst accuracy and deviation, the 0{ring operator} monitor angle showed the best accuracy and smallest deviation with the upper target. Thus it is recommended that the camera trocar be placed directly above the organ of interest, and the part of the organ to be reached should be displayed slightly above the center of the feedback monitor. For physical workload, the method of gripping the tools was the most important factor. The scissors-type tool caused the largest wrist flexion, in contrast both free styles hand postures with the Intuitool showed the least wrist flexion.",
keywords = "Aiming with long stylus, Ergonomic tool design, Insertion of tool, Laparoscopy",
author = "Adriana Trejo and Jung, {Myung Chul} and Dmitry Oleynikov and Hallbeck, {M. Susan}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "745--753",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool

AU - Trejo, Adriana

AU - Jung, Myung Chul

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Two laparoscopic tools, a scissor-type grasper and an ergonomically designed grasper, were compared in terms of operation efficiency and physical workload while inserting into a simulated abdomen and aiming five cross-shaped targets. Thirty right-handed novice participants performed the tasks with five tool-grasping hand postures at two computer monitor angles that simulated reaching an organ during laparoscopic surgery. When comparing the two free style hand postures used, there was a significant improvement in operation efficiency. This demonstrated that the participants quickly became familiar with the Intuitool by finding new hand postures that will significantly help them reach the target faster and more accurately. The 45{ring operator} monitor angle showed the worst accuracy and deviation, the 0{ring operator} monitor angle showed the best accuracy and smallest deviation with the upper target. Thus it is recommended that the camera trocar be placed directly above the organ of interest, and the part of the organ to be reached should be displayed slightly above the center of the feedback monitor. For physical workload, the method of gripping the tools was the most important factor. The scissors-type tool caused the largest wrist flexion, in contrast both free styles hand postures with the Intuitool showed the least wrist flexion.

AB - Two laparoscopic tools, a scissor-type grasper and an ergonomically designed grasper, were compared in terms of operation efficiency and physical workload while inserting into a simulated abdomen and aiming five cross-shaped targets. Thirty right-handed novice participants performed the tasks with five tool-grasping hand postures at two computer monitor angles that simulated reaching an organ during laparoscopic surgery. When comparing the two free style hand postures used, there was a significant improvement in operation efficiency. This demonstrated that the participants quickly became familiar with the Intuitool by finding new hand postures that will significantly help them reach the target faster and more accurately. The 45{ring operator} monitor angle showed the worst accuracy and deviation, the 0{ring operator} monitor angle showed the best accuracy and smallest deviation with the upper target. Thus it is recommended that the camera trocar be placed directly above the organ of interest, and the part of the organ to be reached should be displayed slightly above the center of the feedback monitor. For physical workload, the method of gripping the tools was the most important factor. The scissors-type tool caused the largest wrist flexion, in contrast both free styles hand postures with the Intuitool showed the least wrist flexion.

KW - Aiming with long stylus

KW - Ergonomic tool design

KW - Insertion of tool

KW - Laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347328110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347328110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 745

EP - 753

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 6

ER -