Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins

Mark W Beatty, M. L. Swartz, B. K. Moore, R. W. Phillips, T. A. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seven mechanical/physical properties were used to evaluate 10 unfilled resins: eight aromatic dimethacrylates and two urethane dimethacrylates. Physical property tests included compressive strength, Young's modulus in compression, uniaxial tensile strength, intrinsic yield point, toothbrush abrasion, Knoop hardness, and water sorption. Controlled changes were made in the following four material parameters: amount of crosslinking diluent present in the uncured monomer, functionality of the monomer, repeat unit chemistry of the monomer (urethane vs. aromatic structure) and mode of activation (chemical vs. visible light). Polymers containing a high concentration of crosslinking agent (50 wt%) were found to be tougher and to possess lower hardness than materials containing lesser amounts of crosslinking agent. This was attributed to the flexible nature of the triethylene glycol dimethacrylate crosslinking molecule. Exposure to water plasticized the highly crosslinked materials to the degree that the yield point and elastic modulus were effectively lowered. Most of the tested properties were unaffected by differences in functionality except resistance to toothbrush abrasion, which was enhanced for polymers derived from high functionality monomers. The urethane‐based polymers sorbed substantially more water than the aromatic‐based materials, which presumably resulted in lower values for surface hardness. However, the urethane resins were very tough, and excellent resistance to toothbrush abrasion was observed. Property differences caused by differences in activation mode were small, although the visible light materials did sorb more water. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-413
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Crosslinking
Resins
Monomers
Abrasion
Polymers
Water
Hardness
Urethane
Physical properties
Elastic moduli
Chemical activation
Glycols
Compressive strength
Sorption
Tensile strength
Molecules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins. / Beatty, Mark W; Swartz, M. L.; Moore, B. K.; Phillips, R. W.; Roberts, T. A.

In: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 403-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f0328c5b75243d0af62f27563f85289,
title = "Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins",
abstract = "Seven mechanical/physical properties were used to evaluate 10 unfilled resins: eight aromatic dimethacrylates and two urethane dimethacrylates. Physical property tests included compressive strength, Young's modulus in compression, uniaxial tensile strength, intrinsic yield point, toothbrush abrasion, Knoop hardness, and water sorption. Controlled changes were made in the following four material parameters: amount of crosslinking diluent present in the uncured monomer, functionality of the monomer, repeat unit chemistry of the monomer (urethane vs. aromatic structure) and mode of activation (chemical vs. visible light). Polymers containing a high concentration of crosslinking agent (50 wt{\%}) were found to be tougher and to possess lower hardness than materials containing lesser amounts of crosslinking agent. This was attributed to the flexible nature of the triethylene glycol dimethacrylate crosslinking molecule. Exposure to water plasticized the highly crosslinked materials to the degree that the yield point and elastic modulus were effectively lowered. Most of the tested properties were unaffected by differences in functionality except resistance to toothbrush abrasion, which was enhanced for polymers derived from high functionality monomers. The urethane‐based polymers sorbed substantially more water than the aromatic‐based materials, which presumably resulted in lower values for surface hardness. However, the urethane resins were very tough, and excellent resistance to toothbrush abrasion was observed. Property differences caused by differences in activation mode were small, although the visible light materials did sorb more water. {\circledC} 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.",
author = "Beatty, {Mark W} and Swartz, {M. L.} and Moore, {B. K.} and Phillips, {R. W.} and Roberts, {T. A.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.820270314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "403--413",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research",
issn = "1552-4973",
publisher = "Heterocorporation",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of crosslinking agent content, monomer functionality, and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins

AU - Beatty, Mark W

AU - Swartz, M. L.

AU - Moore, B. K.

AU - Phillips, R. W.

AU - Roberts, T. A.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Seven mechanical/physical properties were used to evaluate 10 unfilled resins: eight aromatic dimethacrylates and two urethane dimethacrylates. Physical property tests included compressive strength, Young's modulus in compression, uniaxial tensile strength, intrinsic yield point, toothbrush abrasion, Knoop hardness, and water sorption. Controlled changes were made in the following four material parameters: amount of crosslinking diluent present in the uncured monomer, functionality of the monomer, repeat unit chemistry of the monomer (urethane vs. aromatic structure) and mode of activation (chemical vs. visible light). Polymers containing a high concentration of crosslinking agent (50 wt%) were found to be tougher and to possess lower hardness than materials containing lesser amounts of crosslinking agent. This was attributed to the flexible nature of the triethylene glycol dimethacrylate crosslinking molecule. Exposure to water plasticized the highly crosslinked materials to the degree that the yield point and elastic modulus were effectively lowered. Most of the tested properties were unaffected by differences in functionality except resistance to toothbrush abrasion, which was enhanced for polymers derived from high functionality monomers. The urethane‐based polymers sorbed substantially more water than the aromatic‐based materials, which presumably resulted in lower values for surface hardness. However, the urethane resins were very tough, and excellent resistance to toothbrush abrasion was observed. Property differences caused by differences in activation mode were small, although the visible light materials did sorb more water. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

AB - Seven mechanical/physical properties were used to evaluate 10 unfilled resins: eight aromatic dimethacrylates and two urethane dimethacrylates. Physical property tests included compressive strength, Young's modulus in compression, uniaxial tensile strength, intrinsic yield point, toothbrush abrasion, Knoop hardness, and water sorption. Controlled changes were made in the following four material parameters: amount of crosslinking diluent present in the uncured monomer, functionality of the monomer, repeat unit chemistry of the monomer (urethane vs. aromatic structure) and mode of activation (chemical vs. visible light). Polymers containing a high concentration of crosslinking agent (50 wt%) were found to be tougher and to possess lower hardness than materials containing lesser amounts of crosslinking agent. This was attributed to the flexible nature of the triethylene glycol dimethacrylate crosslinking molecule. Exposure to water plasticized the highly crosslinked materials to the degree that the yield point and elastic modulus were effectively lowered. Most of the tested properties were unaffected by differences in functionality except resistance to toothbrush abrasion, which was enhanced for polymers derived from high functionality monomers. The urethane‐based polymers sorbed substantially more water than the aromatic‐based materials, which presumably resulted in lower values for surface hardness. However, the urethane resins were very tough, and excellent resistance to toothbrush abrasion was observed. Property differences caused by differences in activation mode were small, although the visible light materials did sorb more water. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027572106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027572106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.820270314

DO - 10.1002/jbm.820270314

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 403

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

SN - 1552-4973

IS - 3

ER -