Effect of brushing with sonic and counterrotational toothbrushes on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Paul A Hansen, W. Killoy, K. Masterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with both a sonic and mechanical counter rotary power toothbrush on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty-five extracted teeth were divided into three random groups and had orthodontic brackets bonded to them. One group was brushed with a counterrotational toothbrush, the Interplak, one group with a sonic toothbrush, the Sonicare, and a third group was not brushed and was held as a control. After the equivalent of 2 years brushing, the teeth were placed in an Instron machine and the shear force to remove the brackets was recorded. Group 1, the counter rotary power brush, had a mean of 107.5 kg/cm2, the second group, the sonic brush, had a mean of 79.7 kg/cm2, and the control group had a mean of 125. 4 kg/cm2. Single factor analysis of variance followed by the Fisher-Hayter Multiple Comparison Procedure showed a statistically significant difference between the sonic power brush and the control (P <.01), but no significant difference between the counter rotary and the control (P >.05). There was no significant difference between the two power brushes (P >.05).

Fingerprint

Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth
Statistical Factor Analysis
Analysis of Variance
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

@article{7d8a4de7bcd443c3a62ecacc1e7c1bc9,
title = "Effect of brushing with sonic and counterrotational toothbrushes on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with both a sonic and mechanical counter rotary power toothbrush on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty-five extracted teeth were divided into three random groups and had orthodontic brackets bonded to them. One group was brushed with a counterrotational toothbrush, the Interplak, one group with a sonic toothbrush, the Sonicare, and a third group was not brushed and was held as a control. After the equivalent of 2 years brushing, the teeth were placed in an Instron machine and the shear force to remove the brackets was recorded. Group 1, the counter rotary power brush, had a mean of 107.5 kg/cm2, the second group, the sonic brush, had a mean of 79.7 kg/cm2, and the control group had a mean of 125. 4 kg/cm2. Single factor analysis of variance followed by the Fisher-Hayter Multiple Comparison Procedure showed a statistically significant difference between the sonic power brush and the control (P <.01), but no significant difference between the counter rotary and the control (P >.05). There was no significant difference between the two power brushes (P >.05).",
author = "Hansen, {Paul A} and W. Killoy and K. Masterson",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70316-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "55--60",
journal = "American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics",
issn = "0889-5406",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of brushing with sonic and counterrotational toothbrushes on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

AU - Hansen, Paul A

AU - Killoy, W.

AU - Masterson, K.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with both a sonic and mechanical counter rotary power toothbrush on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty-five extracted teeth were divided into three random groups and had orthodontic brackets bonded to them. One group was brushed with a counterrotational toothbrush, the Interplak, one group with a sonic toothbrush, the Sonicare, and a third group was not brushed and was held as a control. After the equivalent of 2 years brushing, the teeth were placed in an Instron machine and the shear force to remove the brackets was recorded. Group 1, the counter rotary power brush, had a mean of 107.5 kg/cm2, the second group, the sonic brush, had a mean of 79.7 kg/cm2, and the control group had a mean of 125. 4 kg/cm2. Single factor analysis of variance followed by the Fisher-Hayter Multiple Comparison Procedure showed a statistically significant difference between the sonic power brush and the control (P <.01), but no significant difference between the counter rotary and the control (P >.05). There was no significant difference between the two power brushes (P >.05).

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with both a sonic and mechanical counter rotary power toothbrush on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Forty-five extracted teeth were divided into three random groups and had orthodontic brackets bonded to them. One group was brushed with a counterrotational toothbrush, the Interplak, one group with a sonic toothbrush, the Sonicare, and a third group was not brushed and was held as a control. After the equivalent of 2 years brushing, the teeth were placed in an Instron machine and the shear force to remove the brackets was recorded. Group 1, the counter rotary power brush, had a mean of 107.5 kg/cm2, the second group, the sonic brush, had a mean of 79.7 kg/cm2, and the control group had a mean of 125. 4 kg/cm2. Single factor analysis of variance followed by the Fisher-Hayter Multiple Comparison Procedure showed a statistically significant difference between the sonic power brush and the control (P <.01), but no significant difference between the counter rotary and the control (P >.05). There was no significant difference between the two power brushes (P >.05).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032622282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032622282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70316-1

DO - 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70316-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 9878958

AN - SCOPUS:0032622282

VL - 115

SP - 55

EP - 60

JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SN - 0889-5406

IS - 1

ER -