Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys

Gera E. Nagelhout, Marc C. Willemsen, Hein de Vries, Ute Mons, Sara C. Hitchman, Anton E. Kunst, Romain Guignard, Mohammad Siahpush, Hua Hie Yong, Bas van den Putte, Geoffrey T. Fong, James F. Thrasher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To examine (1) the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on changes in self-reported warning label responses: warning salience, cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes and avoiding warnings, and (2) whether these changes differed by smokers’ educational level. Methods Longitudinal data of smokers from two survey waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys were used. In France and the UK, pictorial warning labels were implemented on the back of cigarette packages between the two survey waves. In Germany and the Netherlands, the text warning labels did not change. Findings Warning salience decreased between the surveys in France (OR=0.81, p=0.046) and showed a non-significant increase in the UK (OR=1.30, p=0.058), cognitive responses increased in the UK (OR=1.34, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.70, p=0.002), forgoing cigarettes increased in the UK (OR=1.65, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.83, p=0.047), and avoiding warnings increased in France (OR=2.93, p<0.001) and the UK (OR=2.19, p<0.001). Warning salience and cognitive responses decreased in Germany and the Netherlands, forgoing did not change in these countries and avoidance increased in Germany. In general, these changes in warning label responses did not differ by education. However, in the UK, avoidance increased especially among low (OR=2.25, p=0.001)and moderate educated smokers (OR=3.21, p<0.001). Conclusions The warning labels implemented in France in 2010 and in the UK in 2008 with pictures on one side of the cigarette package did not succeed in increasing warning salience, but did increase avoidance. The labels did not increase educational inequalities among continuing smokers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-332
Number of pages8
JournalTobacco control
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

Tobacco Products
nicotine
France
Tobacco
Germany
Netherlands
educational inequality
Surveys and Questionnaires
Education
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers : Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys. / Nagelhout, Gera E.; Willemsen, Marc C.; de Vries, Hein; Mons, Ute; Hitchman, Sara C.; Kunst, Anton E.; Guignard, Romain; Siahpush, Mohammad; Yong, Hua Hie; van den Putte, Bas; Fong, Geoffrey T.; Thrasher, James F.

In: Tobacco control, Vol. 25, No. 3, 05.2016, p. 325-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagelhout, GE, Willemsen, MC, de Vries, H, Mons, U, Hitchman, SC, Kunst, AE, Guignard, R, Siahpush, M, Yong, HH, van den Putte, B, Fong, GT & Thrasher, JF 2016, 'Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys', Tobacco control, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051971
Nagelhout, Gera E. ; Willemsen, Marc C. ; de Vries, Hein ; Mons, Ute ; Hitchman, Sara C. ; Kunst, Anton E. ; Guignard, Romain ; Siahpush, Mohammad ; Yong, Hua Hie ; van den Putte, Bas ; Fong, Geoffrey T. ; Thrasher, James F. / Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers : Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys. In: Tobacco control. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 325-332.
@article{a194b5f905d4419fbf4962501a2e7021,
title = "Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys",
abstract = "Objective To examine (1) the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on changes in self-reported warning label responses: warning salience, cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes and avoiding warnings, and (2) whether these changes differed by smokers’ educational level. Methods Longitudinal data of smokers from two survey waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys were used. In France and the UK, pictorial warning labels were implemented on the back of cigarette packages between the two survey waves. In Germany and the Netherlands, the text warning labels did not change. Findings Warning salience decreased between the surveys in France (OR=0.81, p=0.046) and showed a non-significant increase in the UK (OR=1.30, p=0.058), cognitive responses increased in the UK (OR=1.34, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.70, p=0.002), forgoing cigarettes increased in the UK (OR=1.65, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.83, p=0.047), and avoiding warnings increased in France (OR=2.93, p<0.001) and the UK (OR=2.19, p<0.001). Warning salience and cognitive responses decreased in Germany and the Netherlands, forgoing did not change in these countries and avoidance increased in Germany. In general, these changes in warning label responses did not differ by education. However, in the UK, avoidance increased especially among low (OR=2.25, p=0.001)and moderate educated smokers (OR=3.21, p<0.001). Conclusions The warning labels implemented in France in 2010 and in the UK in 2008 with pictures on one side of the cigarette package did not succeed in increasing warning salience, but did increase avoidance. The labels did not increase educational inequalities among continuing smokers.",
author = "Nagelhout, {Gera E.} and Willemsen, {Marc C.} and {de Vries}, Hein and Ute Mons and Hitchman, {Sara C.} and Kunst, {Anton E.} and Romain Guignard and Mohammad Siahpush and Yong, {Hua Hie} and {van den Putte}, Bas and Fong, {Geoffrey T.} and Thrasher, {James F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051971",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "325--332",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educational differences in the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on smokers

T2 - Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys

AU - Nagelhout, Gera E.

AU - Willemsen, Marc C.

AU - de Vries, Hein

AU - Mons, Ute

AU - Hitchman, Sara C.

AU - Kunst, Anton E.

AU - Guignard, Romain

AU - Siahpush, Mohammad

AU - Yong, Hua Hie

AU - van den Putte, Bas

AU - Fong, Geoffrey T.

AU - Thrasher, James F.

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - Objective To examine (1) the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on changes in self-reported warning label responses: warning salience, cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes and avoiding warnings, and (2) whether these changes differed by smokers’ educational level. Methods Longitudinal data of smokers from two survey waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys were used. In France and the UK, pictorial warning labels were implemented on the back of cigarette packages between the two survey waves. In Germany and the Netherlands, the text warning labels did not change. Findings Warning salience decreased between the surveys in France (OR=0.81, p=0.046) and showed a non-significant increase in the UK (OR=1.30, p=0.058), cognitive responses increased in the UK (OR=1.34, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.70, p=0.002), forgoing cigarettes increased in the UK (OR=1.65, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.83, p=0.047), and avoiding warnings increased in France (OR=2.93, p<0.001) and the UK (OR=2.19, p<0.001). Warning salience and cognitive responses decreased in Germany and the Netherlands, forgoing did not change in these countries and avoidance increased in Germany. In general, these changes in warning label responses did not differ by education. However, in the UK, avoidance increased especially among low (OR=2.25, p=0.001)and moderate educated smokers (OR=3.21, p<0.001). Conclusions The warning labels implemented in France in 2010 and in the UK in 2008 with pictures on one side of the cigarette package did not succeed in increasing warning salience, but did increase avoidance. The labels did not increase educational inequalities among continuing smokers.

AB - Objective To examine (1) the impact of pictorial cigarette warning labels on changes in self-reported warning label responses: warning salience, cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes and avoiding warnings, and (2) whether these changes differed by smokers’ educational level. Methods Longitudinal data of smokers from two survey waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys were used. In France and the UK, pictorial warning labels were implemented on the back of cigarette packages between the two survey waves. In Germany and the Netherlands, the text warning labels did not change. Findings Warning salience decreased between the surveys in France (OR=0.81, p=0.046) and showed a non-significant increase in the UK (OR=1.30, p=0.058), cognitive responses increased in the UK (OR=1.34, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.70, p=0.002), forgoing cigarettes increased in the UK (OR=1.65, p<0.001) and decreased in France (OR=0.83, p=0.047), and avoiding warnings increased in France (OR=2.93, p<0.001) and the UK (OR=2.19, p<0.001). Warning salience and cognitive responses decreased in Germany and the Netherlands, forgoing did not change in these countries and avoidance increased in Germany. In general, these changes in warning label responses did not differ by education. However, in the UK, avoidance increased especially among low (OR=2.25, p=0.001)and moderate educated smokers (OR=3.21, p<0.001). Conclusions The warning labels implemented in France in 2010 and in the UK in 2008 with pictures on one side of the cigarette package did not succeed in increasing warning salience, but did increase avoidance. The labels did not increase educational inequalities among continuing smokers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930387212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930387212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051971

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051971

M3 - Article

C2 - 25873647

AN - SCOPUS:84930387212

VL - 25

SP - 325

EP - 332

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 3

ER -