Economic incentive framework for sustainable energy use in US residential construction

K. R. Grosskopf, Charles J. Kibert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Searching for new ways to be competitive in an increasingly deregulated market, energy suppliers worldwide have turned to energy conservation measures (ECMs) to avoid costly generation expansion, to build relationships with consumers and to comply with new international emissions standards. To maximise the cost effectiveness of an energy conservation programme, a framework is presented to assess consumer 'willingness-to-pay' for ECMs and avoided supply costs. The goal of this framework is to provide a methodology to optimise supplier incentives that will maximise consumer adoption and minimise energy production costs. A survey of 400 US homebuyers found that nearly 90% would invest in ECMs. Yet for every two years required to 'payback' the initial investment, consumer willingness-to-pay declines 25%. A case study of a medium-size US utility found that most ECMs contribute more to profitable base load reduction than to costly peak load reduction, meaning utility loss in revenue often exceeds avoided supply costs. However, the average housing unit conserving 7,718kWh/yr could save US$216.10 per year, in addition to electricity costs, if the cost of avoided emissions abatement were credited back to the consumer. Based on these savings, expected ECM adoption could eliminate 1.65 × 108 kWh of energy use and 107,197 tons of CO2 emissions for every 20,000 single family homes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)839-846
Number of pages8
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Fingerprint

Energy conservation
Economics
Costs
Cost effectiveness
Sustainable energy
Economic incentives
Energy use
Electricity
Suppliers
Willingness-to-pay

Keywords

  • Energy conservation
  • Incentives
  • Residential
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Management Information Systems
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Economic incentive framework for sustainable energy use in US residential construction. / Grosskopf, K. R.; Kibert, Charles J.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 8, 01.08.2006, p. 839-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3684710e54243499ac8a38074db8fa4,
title = "Economic incentive framework for sustainable energy use in US residential construction",
abstract = "Searching for new ways to be competitive in an increasingly deregulated market, energy suppliers worldwide have turned to energy conservation measures (ECMs) to avoid costly generation expansion, to build relationships with consumers and to comply with new international emissions standards. To maximise the cost effectiveness of an energy conservation programme, a framework is presented to assess consumer 'willingness-to-pay' for ECMs and avoided supply costs. The goal of this framework is to provide a methodology to optimise supplier incentives that will maximise consumer adoption and minimise energy production costs. A survey of 400 US homebuyers found that nearly 90{\%} would invest in ECMs. Yet for every two years required to 'payback' the initial investment, consumer willingness-to-pay declines 25{\%}. A case study of a medium-size US utility found that most ECMs contribute more to profitable base load reduction than to costly peak load reduction, meaning utility loss in revenue often exceeds avoided supply costs. However, the average housing unit conserving 7,718kWh/yr could save US$216.10 per year, in addition to electricity costs, if the cost of avoided emissions abatement were credited back to the consumer. Based on these savings, expected ECM adoption could eliminate 1.65 × 108 kWh of energy use and 107,197 tons of CO2 emissions for every 20,000 single family homes.",
keywords = "Energy conservation, Incentives, Residential, USA",
author = "Grosskopf, {K. R.} and Kibert, {Charles J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01446190600601818",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "839--846",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic incentive framework for sustainable energy use in US residential construction

AU - Grosskopf, K. R.

AU - Kibert, Charles J.

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - Searching for new ways to be competitive in an increasingly deregulated market, energy suppliers worldwide have turned to energy conservation measures (ECMs) to avoid costly generation expansion, to build relationships with consumers and to comply with new international emissions standards. To maximise the cost effectiveness of an energy conservation programme, a framework is presented to assess consumer 'willingness-to-pay' for ECMs and avoided supply costs. The goal of this framework is to provide a methodology to optimise supplier incentives that will maximise consumer adoption and minimise energy production costs. A survey of 400 US homebuyers found that nearly 90% would invest in ECMs. Yet for every two years required to 'payback' the initial investment, consumer willingness-to-pay declines 25%. A case study of a medium-size US utility found that most ECMs contribute more to profitable base load reduction than to costly peak load reduction, meaning utility loss in revenue often exceeds avoided supply costs. However, the average housing unit conserving 7,718kWh/yr could save US$216.10 per year, in addition to electricity costs, if the cost of avoided emissions abatement were credited back to the consumer. Based on these savings, expected ECM adoption could eliminate 1.65 × 108 kWh of energy use and 107,197 tons of CO2 emissions for every 20,000 single family homes.

AB - Searching for new ways to be competitive in an increasingly deregulated market, energy suppliers worldwide have turned to energy conservation measures (ECMs) to avoid costly generation expansion, to build relationships with consumers and to comply with new international emissions standards. To maximise the cost effectiveness of an energy conservation programme, a framework is presented to assess consumer 'willingness-to-pay' for ECMs and avoided supply costs. The goal of this framework is to provide a methodology to optimise supplier incentives that will maximise consumer adoption and minimise energy production costs. A survey of 400 US homebuyers found that nearly 90% would invest in ECMs. Yet for every two years required to 'payback' the initial investment, consumer willingness-to-pay declines 25%. A case study of a medium-size US utility found that most ECMs contribute more to profitable base load reduction than to costly peak load reduction, meaning utility loss in revenue often exceeds avoided supply costs. However, the average housing unit conserving 7,718kWh/yr could save US$216.10 per year, in addition to electricity costs, if the cost of avoided emissions abatement were credited back to the consumer. Based on these savings, expected ECM adoption could eliminate 1.65 × 108 kWh of energy use and 107,197 tons of CO2 emissions for every 20,000 single family homes.

KW - Energy conservation

KW - Incentives

KW - Residential

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748207251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748207251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446190600601818

DO - 10.1080/01446190600601818

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748207251

VL - 24

SP - 839

EP - 846

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 8

ER -