Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis

Sanjay Malhotra, John Sweeny, Jeff Anderson, Thomas Gerald Lynch, Vincent Massullo, Shirish Jani, Richard A. Schatz, Prabhakar Tripuraneni, Paul S. Teirstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of balloon angioplasty versus repeat stenting on the early angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis. The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often yields excellent early results, but is associated with a high rate of late recurrence. In the SCRIPPS trial, patients with restenosis were treated either with balloon angioplasty alone or placement of additional stents to optimize angiographic results before randomization and exposure of the restenotic segment to gamma radiation or placebo. In patients undergoing repeat catheter based intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, quantitative coronary angiography was used to compare the results of balloon angioplasty alone versus repeat stenting on early lumen loss. After a mean delay time interval of 71 min, the early loss was 0.35 ± 0.34 mm in the balloon angioplasty alone group compared to 0.01 ± 0.34 mm in the repeat-stenting group (P = 0.004). The early loss index in the balloon angioplasty alone group (12.8 ± 12.9%) was significantly greater than in the repeat stenting group (0.7 ± 12.1%; P = 0.003). Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis often provides excellent immediate angiographic results, luminal diameters are significantly reduced in the early time period after balloon dilatation. Repeat stenting nearly abolishes this early luminal loss. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:35-38.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-38
Number of pages4
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume52
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 3 2001

Fingerprint

Balloon Angioplasty
Stents
Gamma Rays
Random Allocation
Coronary Angiography
Dilatation
Catheters
Placebos
Recurrence
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Radiotherapy
  • Restenosis
  • Stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Malhotra, S., Sweeny, J., Anderson, J., Lynch, T. G., Massullo, V., Jani, S., ... Teirstein, P. S. (2001). Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 52(1), 35-38.

Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis. / Malhotra, Sanjay; Sweeny, John; Anderson, Jeff; Lynch, Thomas Gerald; Massullo, Vincent; Jani, Shirish; Schatz, Richard A.; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar; Teirstein, Paul S.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 52, No. 1, 03.02.2001, p. 35-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malhotra, S, Sweeny, J, Anderson, J, Lynch, TG, Massullo, V, Jani, S, Schatz, RA, Tripuraneni, P & Teirstein, PS 2001, 'Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 35-38.
Malhotra S, Sweeny J, Anderson J, Lynch TG, Massullo V, Jani S et al. Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2001 Feb 3;52(1):35-38.
Malhotra, Sanjay ; Sweeny, John ; Anderson, Jeff ; Lynch, Thomas Gerald ; Massullo, Vincent ; Jani, Shirish ; Schatz, Richard A. ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Teirstein, Paul S. / Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2001 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 35-38.
@article{a97f4ddd46dd403f8ba0059eb72399ba,
title = "Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of balloon angioplasty versus repeat stenting on the early angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis. The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often yields excellent early results, but is associated with a high rate of late recurrence. In the SCRIPPS trial, patients with restenosis were treated either with balloon angioplasty alone or placement of additional stents to optimize angiographic results before randomization and exposure of the restenotic segment to gamma radiation or placebo. In patients undergoing repeat catheter based intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, quantitative coronary angiography was used to compare the results of balloon angioplasty alone versus repeat stenting on early lumen loss. After a mean delay time interval of 71 min, the early loss was 0.35 ± 0.34 mm in the balloon angioplasty alone group compared to 0.01 ± 0.34 mm in the repeat-stenting group (P = 0.004). The early loss index in the balloon angioplasty alone group (12.8 ± 12.9{\%}) was significantly greater than in the repeat stenting group (0.7 ± 12.1{\%}; P = 0.003). Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis often provides excellent immediate angiographic results, luminal diameters are significantly reduced in the early time period after balloon dilatation. Repeat stenting nearly abolishes this early luminal loss. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:35-38.",
keywords = "Radiotherapy, Restenosis, Stent",
author = "Sanjay Malhotra and John Sweeny and Jeff Anderson and Lynch, {Thomas Gerald} and Vincent Massullo and Shirish Jani and Schatz, {Richard A.} and Prabhakar Tripuraneni and Teirstein, {Paul S.}",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "35--38",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early lumen loss after repeat coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis

AU - Malhotra, Sanjay

AU - Sweeny, John

AU - Anderson, Jeff

AU - Lynch, Thomas Gerald

AU - Massullo, Vincent

AU - Jani, Shirish

AU - Schatz, Richard A.

AU - Tripuraneni, Prabhakar

AU - Teirstein, Paul S.

PY - 2001/2/3

Y1 - 2001/2/3

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of balloon angioplasty versus repeat stenting on the early angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis. The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often yields excellent early results, but is associated with a high rate of late recurrence. In the SCRIPPS trial, patients with restenosis were treated either with balloon angioplasty alone or placement of additional stents to optimize angiographic results before randomization and exposure of the restenotic segment to gamma radiation or placebo. In patients undergoing repeat catheter based intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, quantitative coronary angiography was used to compare the results of balloon angioplasty alone versus repeat stenting on early lumen loss. After a mean delay time interval of 71 min, the early loss was 0.35 ± 0.34 mm in the balloon angioplasty alone group compared to 0.01 ± 0.34 mm in the repeat-stenting group (P = 0.004). The early loss index in the balloon angioplasty alone group (12.8 ± 12.9%) was significantly greater than in the repeat stenting group (0.7 ± 12.1%; P = 0.003). Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis often provides excellent immediate angiographic results, luminal diameters are significantly reduced in the early time period after balloon dilatation. Repeat stenting nearly abolishes this early luminal loss. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:35-38.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of balloon angioplasty versus repeat stenting on the early angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis. The treatment of in-stent restenosis using balloon angioplasty alone often yields excellent early results, but is associated with a high rate of late recurrence. In the SCRIPPS trial, patients with restenosis were treated either with balloon angioplasty alone or placement of additional stents to optimize angiographic results before randomization and exposure of the restenotic segment to gamma radiation or placebo. In patients undergoing repeat catheter based intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, quantitative coronary angiography was used to compare the results of balloon angioplasty alone versus repeat stenting on early lumen loss. After a mean delay time interval of 71 min, the early loss was 0.35 ± 0.34 mm in the balloon angioplasty alone group compared to 0.01 ± 0.34 mm in the repeat-stenting group (P = 0.004). The early loss index in the balloon angioplasty alone group (12.8 ± 12.9%) was significantly greater than in the repeat stenting group (0.7 ± 12.1%; P = 0.003). Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis often provides excellent immediate angiographic results, luminal diameters are significantly reduced in the early time period after balloon dilatation. Repeat stenting nearly abolishes this early luminal loss. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:35-38.

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Restenosis

KW - Stent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035154884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035154884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 35

EP - 38

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 1

ER -