Duplicated Hospital Facilities

Paul B. Ginsburg, Daniel M. Koretz, Steven A. Finkler, David W Palm, Stephen Frederick, John Sahs, William B. Schwartz, Paul L. Joskow

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

To the Editor: Schwartz and Joskow argued in the December 18 issue1 that the successful elimination of duplication in hospital beds and three specialized types of hospital facilities would save little, if anything, beyond the cost of current health-planning activities. Their analysis, however, omits a major source of potential savings. They assumed that demand for the hospital services in question would not be affected by elimination of excess facilities — that is, if one hospital in a community were closed, days of care per capita would not be changed; all that would occur would be the transfer of days of.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)979-980
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume304
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 16 1981

Fingerprint

Health Planning
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ginsburg, P. B., Koretz, D. M., Finkler, S. A., Palm, D. W., Frederick, S., Sahs, J., ... Joskow, P. L. (1981). Duplicated Hospital Facilities. New England Journal of Medicine, 304(16), 979-980. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198104163041620

Duplicated Hospital Facilities. / Ginsburg, Paul B.; Koretz, Daniel M.; Finkler, Steven A.; Palm, David W; Frederick, Stephen; Sahs, John; Schwartz, William B.; Joskow, Paul L.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 304, No. 16, 16.04.1981, p. 979-980.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Ginsburg, PB, Koretz, DM, Finkler, SA, Palm, DW, Frederick, S, Sahs, J, Schwartz, WB & Joskow, PL 1981, 'Duplicated Hospital Facilities', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 304, no. 16, pp. 979-980. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198104163041620
Ginsburg PB, Koretz DM, Finkler SA, Palm DW, Frederick S, Sahs J et al. Duplicated Hospital Facilities. New England Journal of Medicine. 1981 Apr 16;304(16):979-980. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198104163041620
Ginsburg, Paul B. ; Koretz, Daniel M. ; Finkler, Steven A. ; Palm, David W ; Frederick, Stephen ; Sahs, John ; Schwartz, William B. ; Joskow, Paul L. / Duplicated Hospital Facilities. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 1981 ; Vol. 304, No. 16. pp. 979-980.
@article{759dbeadc10940a5974e0bf7082115e9,
title = "Duplicated Hospital Facilities",
abstract = "To the Editor: Schwartz and Joskow argued in the December 18 issue1 that the successful elimination of duplication in hospital beds and three specialized types of hospital facilities would save little, if anything, beyond the cost of current health-planning activities. Their analysis, however, omits a major source of potential savings. They assumed that demand for the hospital services in question would not be affected by elimination of excess facilities — that is, if one hospital in a community were closed, days of care per capita would not be changed; all that would occur would be the transfer of days of.",
author = "Ginsburg, {Paul B.} and Koretz, {Daniel M.} and Finkler, {Steven A.} and Palm, {David W} and Stephen Frederick and John Sahs and Schwartz, {William B.} and Joskow, {Paul L.}",
year = "1981",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1056/NEJM198104163041620",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "304",
pages = "979--980",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Duplicated Hospital Facilities

AU - Ginsburg, Paul B.

AU - Koretz, Daniel M.

AU - Finkler, Steven A.

AU - Palm, David W

AU - Frederick, Stephen

AU - Sahs, John

AU - Schwartz, William B.

AU - Joskow, Paul L.

PY - 1981/4/16

Y1 - 1981/4/16

N2 - To the Editor: Schwartz and Joskow argued in the December 18 issue1 that the successful elimination of duplication in hospital beds and three specialized types of hospital facilities would save little, if anything, beyond the cost of current health-planning activities. Their analysis, however, omits a major source of potential savings. They assumed that demand for the hospital services in question would not be affected by elimination of excess facilities — that is, if one hospital in a community were closed, days of care per capita would not be changed; all that would occur would be the transfer of days of.

AB - To the Editor: Schwartz and Joskow argued in the December 18 issue1 that the successful elimination of duplication in hospital beds and three specialized types of hospital facilities would save little, if anything, beyond the cost of current health-planning activities. Their analysis, however, omits a major source of potential savings. They assumed that demand for the hospital services in question would not be affected by elimination of excess facilities — that is, if one hospital in a community were closed, days of care per capita would not be changed; all that would occur would be the transfer of days of.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019882543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019882543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198104163041620

DO - 10.1056/NEJM198104163041620

M3 - Letter

VL - 304

SP - 979

EP - 980

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 16

ER -