Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT

K. M. Ayyangar, A. Y C Fung, Sicong Li, S. Pillai, M. M. Yoe-Sein, Weining Zhen, Charles Arthur Enke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares dose volume histograms (DVHs) generated by the ADAC Pinnacle and the Nomos Corvus planning systems. Seven prostate cases and seven head and neck cases were selected for review. Plans computed on both systems possessed exactly the same anatomical contours and IMRT segments. The Pinnacle system used the collapsed cone convolution superposition, while Corvus employed a finite size pencil beam (FSPB) convolution. Prostate DVH results demonstrated similar DVH curves from both systems. For each structure, the ratio of Pinnacle dose value divided by Corvus value was calculated. The high dose structures (which might contain tumour) had ratios close to unity, while the low dose structures (the critical organs) had ratios farther away from unity. Almost all ratios were less than unity, indicating a systematic difference that Pinnacle calculated doses were lower than Corvus ones. Head and neck data provided similar findings. A possible cause for this discrepancy could be the beam modelling. The difference in DVH parameters that we discovered between the two systems was about the same order of magnitude as the measurement-computation difference. When low dose is critical, such difference may affect the clinical planning decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalAustralasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Crows
Convolution
Planning
Cones
Tumors
Prostate
Neck
Head
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Corvus
  • Dose volume histogram
  • Pinnacle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT. / Ayyangar, K. M.; Fung, A. Y C; Li, Sicong; Pillai, S.; Yoe-Sein, M. M.; Zhen, Weining; Enke, Charles Arthur.

In: Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fdd4f8455e7045b0985f891b87d6f81d,
title = "Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT",
abstract = "This paper compares dose volume histograms (DVHs) generated by the ADAC Pinnacle and the Nomos Corvus planning systems. Seven prostate cases and seven head and neck cases were selected for review. Plans computed on both systems possessed exactly the same anatomical contours and IMRT segments. The Pinnacle system used the collapsed cone convolution superposition, while Corvus employed a finite size pencil beam (FSPB) convolution. Prostate DVH results demonstrated similar DVH curves from both systems. For each structure, the ratio of Pinnacle dose value divided by Corvus value was calculated. The high dose structures (which might contain tumour) had ratios close to unity, while the low dose structures (the critical organs) had ratios farther away from unity. Almost all ratios were less than unity, indicating a systematic difference that Pinnacle calculated doses were lower than Corvus ones. Head and neck data provided similar findings. A possible cause for this discrepancy could be the beam modelling. The difference in DVH parameters that we discovered between the two systems was about the same order of magnitude as the measurement-computation difference. When low dose is critical, such difference may affect the clinical planning decision.",
keywords = "Corvus, Dose volume histogram, Pinnacle",
author = "Ayyangar, {K. M.} and Fung, {A. Y C} and Sicong Li and S. Pillai and Yoe-Sein, {M. M.} and Weining Zhen and Enke, {Charles Arthur}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF03178857",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine",
issn = "0158-9938",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT

AU - Ayyangar, K. M.

AU - Fung, A. Y C

AU - Li, Sicong

AU - Pillai, S.

AU - Yoe-Sein, M. M.

AU - Zhen, Weining

AU - Enke, Charles Arthur

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - This paper compares dose volume histograms (DVHs) generated by the ADAC Pinnacle and the Nomos Corvus planning systems. Seven prostate cases and seven head and neck cases were selected for review. Plans computed on both systems possessed exactly the same anatomical contours and IMRT segments. The Pinnacle system used the collapsed cone convolution superposition, while Corvus employed a finite size pencil beam (FSPB) convolution. Prostate DVH results demonstrated similar DVH curves from both systems. For each structure, the ratio of Pinnacle dose value divided by Corvus value was calculated. The high dose structures (which might contain tumour) had ratios close to unity, while the low dose structures (the critical organs) had ratios farther away from unity. Almost all ratios were less than unity, indicating a systematic difference that Pinnacle calculated doses were lower than Corvus ones. Head and neck data provided similar findings. A possible cause for this discrepancy could be the beam modelling. The difference in DVH parameters that we discovered between the two systems was about the same order of magnitude as the measurement-computation difference. When low dose is critical, such difference may affect the clinical planning decision.

AB - This paper compares dose volume histograms (DVHs) generated by the ADAC Pinnacle and the Nomos Corvus planning systems. Seven prostate cases and seven head and neck cases were selected for review. Plans computed on both systems possessed exactly the same anatomical contours and IMRT segments. The Pinnacle system used the collapsed cone convolution superposition, while Corvus employed a finite size pencil beam (FSPB) convolution. Prostate DVH results demonstrated similar DVH curves from both systems. For each structure, the ratio of Pinnacle dose value divided by Corvus value was calculated. The high dose structures (which might contain tumour) had ratios close to unity, while the low dose structures (the critical organs) had ratios farther away from unity. Almost all ratios were less than unity, indicating a systematic difference that Pinnacle calculated doses were lower than Corvus ones. Head and neck data provided similar findings. A possible cause for this discrepancy could be the beam modelling. The difference in DVH parameters that we discovered between the two systems was about the same order of magnitude as the measurement-computation difference. When low dose is critical, such difference may affect the clinical planning decision.

KW - Corvus

KW - Dose volume histogram

KW - Pinnacle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18744379790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18744379790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03178857

DO - 10.1007/BF03178857

M3 - Article

C2 - 15920983

AN - SCOPUS:18744379790

VL - 28

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

JF - Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

SN - 0158-9938

IS - 1

ER -