Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination

Gregory Schraw, Theresa Wadkins, Lori Olafson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

156 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors conducted a grounded theory study of academic procrastination to explore adaptive and maladaptive aspects of procrastination and to help guide future empirical research. They discuss previous research on the definition and dimensionality of procrastination and describe the study in which interview data were collected in 4 stages, identifying 33 initial categories and 29 macrothemes. Findings were validated by member checks. The authors describe in detail informants' perceptions of procrastination, which were used to construct a 5-component paradigm model that includes adaptive (i.e., cognitive efficiency, peak experience) and maladaptive (i.e., fear of failure, postponement) dimensions of procrastination. These dimensions, in turn, are related to conditions that affect the amount and type of procrastination, as well as cognitive (i.e., prioritizing, optimization) and affective (i.e., reframing, self-handicapping) coping mechanisms. The authors propose 6 general principles and relate them and the paradigm model to previous research. Limitations of the research are discussed, as well as implications for future theory development and validation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-25
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume99
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007

Fingerprint

grounded theory
Research
paradigm
Empirical Research
development theory
Fear
empirical research
coping
Interviews
anxiety
efficiency
interview
Grounded Theory
experience

Keywords

  • Adaptive and maladaptive strategies
  • Paradigm model
  • Procrastination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Doing the things we do : A grounded theory of academic procrastination. / Schraw, Gregory; Wadkins, Theresa; Olafson, Lori.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 1, 01.02.2007, p. 12-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee65c65c7e564fd09307d692cf98092d,
title = "Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination",
abstract = "The authors conducted a grounded theory study of academic procrastination to explore adaptive and maladaptive aspects of procrastination and to help guide future empirical research. They discuss previous research on the definition and dimensionality of procrastination and describe the study in which interview data were collected in 4 stages, identifying 33 initial categories and 29 macrothemes. Findings were validated by member checks. The authors describe in detail informants' perceptions of procrastination, which were used to construct a 5-component paradigm model that includes adaptive (i.e., cognitive efficiency, peak experience) and maladaptive (i.e., fear of failure, postponement) dimensions of procrastination. These dimensions, in turn, are related to conditions that affect the amount and type of procrastination, as well as cognitive (i.e., prioritizing, optimization) and affective (i.e., reframing, self-handicapping) coping mechanisms. The authors propose 6 general principles and relate them and the paradigm model to previous research. Limitations of the research are discussed, as well as implications for future theory development and validation.",
keywords = "Adaptive and maladaptive strategies, Paradigm model, Procrastination",
author = "Gregory Schraw and Theresa Wadkins and Lori Olafson",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "12--25",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing the things we do

T2 - A grounded theory of academic procrastination

AU - Schraw, Gregory

AU - Wadkins, Theresa

AU - Olafson, Lori

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - The authors conducted a grounded theory study of academic procrastination to explore adaptive and maladaptive aspects of procrastination and to help guide future empirical research. They discuss previous research on the definition and dimensionality of procrastination and describe the study in which interview data were collected in 4 stages, identifying 33 initial categories and 29 macrothemes. Findings were validated by member checks. The authors describe in detail informants' perceptions of procrastination, which were used to construct a 5-component paradigm model that includes adaptive (i.e., cognitive efficiency, peak experience) and maladaptive (i.e., fear of failure, postponement) dimensions of procrastination. These dimensions, in turn, are related to conditions that affect the amount and type of procrastination, as well as cognitive (i.e., prioritizing, optimization) and affective (i.e., reframing, self-handicapping) coping mechanisms. The authors propose 6 general principles and relate them and the paradigm model to previous research. Limitations of the research are discussed, as well as implications for future theory development and validation.

AB - The authors conducted a grounded theory study of academic procrastination to explore adaptive and maladaptive aspects of procrastination and to help guide future empirical research. They discuss previous research on the definition and dimensionality of procrastination and describe the study in which interview data were collected in 4 stages, identifying 33 initial categories and 29 macrothemes. Findings were validated by member checks. The authors describe in detail informants' perceptions of procrastination, which were used to construct a 5-component paradigm model that includes adaptive (i.e., cognitive efficiency, peak experience) and maladaptive (i.e., fear of failure, postponement) dimensions of procrastination. These dimensions, in turn, are related to conditions that affect the amount and type of procrastination, as well as cognitive (i.e., prioritizing, optimization) and affective (i.e., reframing, self-handicapping) coping mechanisms. The authors propose 6 general principles and relate them and the paradigm model to previous research. Limitations of the research are discussed, as well as implications for future theory development and validation.

KW - Adaptive and maladaptive strategies

KW - Paradigm model

KW - Procrastination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847626666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847626666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12

DO - 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847626666

VL - 99

SP - 12

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 1

ER -