Does marriage reduce crime?

Torbjørn Skardhamar, Jukka K Savolainen, Kjersti N. Aase, Torkild H. Lyngstad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The "marriage effect" is one of the most widely studied topics of life course criminology. The contemporary consensus is that marriage promotes desistance from crime. Most of the 58 studies reviewed here find a negative longitudinal association between marriage and crime. The results are more consistent among men. Studies that attend to relationship quality, such as the level of marital attachment, tend to produce particularly strong associations. Critical scrutiny of the evidence regarding the causal nature of the reported associations suggests, however, that claims about the restraining influence of marriage are overstated. None of the studies demonstrates evidence of direct (counterfactual) causality; no study has served a causal estimate unbiased by selection processes. Moreover, only a few studies address time ordering, and some of those show that desistance precedes rather than follows marriage. Evidence in support of the theoretical mechanisms responsible for the marriage effect is also mixed and insufficient. The criminological literature has been insensitive to the reality that entering a marital union is increasingly unlikely to signify the point at which a committed, high-quality relationship is formed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-446
Number of pages62
JournalCrime and Justice
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

marriage
offense
evidence
criminology
causality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Skardhamar, T., Savolainen, J. K., Aase, K. N., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2015). Does marriage reduce crime? Crime and Justice, 44(1), 385-446. https://doi.org/10.1086/681557

Does marriage reduce crime? / Skardhamar, Torbjørn; Savolainen, Jukka K; Aase, Kjersti N.; Lyngstad, Torkild H.

In: Crime and Justice, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 385-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skardhamar, T, Savolainen, JK, Aase, KN & Lyngstad, TH 2015, 'Does marriage reduce crime?', Crime and Justice, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 385-446. https://doi.org/10.1086/681557
Skardhamar T, Savolainen JK, Aase KN, Lyngstad TH. Does marriage reduce crime? Crime and Justice. 2015 Jan 1;44(1):385-446. https://doi.org/10.1086/681557
Skardhamar, Torbjørn ; Savolainen, Jukka K ; Aase, Kjersti N. ; Lyngstad, Torkild H. / Does marriage reduce crime?. In: Crime and Justice. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 385-446.
@article{1bd800a275ad4969bab763a29686b221,
title = "Does marriage reduce crime?",
abstract = "The {"}marriage effect{"} is one of the most widely studied topics of life course criminology. The contemporary consensus is that marriage promotes desistance from crime. Most of the 58 studies reviewed here find a negative longitudinal association between marriage and crime. The results are more consistent among men. Studies that attend to relationship quality, such as the level of marital attachment, tend to produce particularly strong associations. Critical scrutiny of the evidence regarding the causal nature of the reported associations suggests, however, that claims about the restraining influence of marriage are overstated. None of the studies demonstrates evidence of direct (counterfactual) causality; no study has served a causal estimate unbiased by selection processes. Moreover, only a few studies address time ordering, and some of those show that desistance precedes rather than follows marriage. Evidence in support of the theoretical mechanisms responsible for the marriage effect is also mixed and insufficient. The criminological literature has been insensitive to the reality that entering a marital union is increasingly unlikely to signify the point at which a committed, high-quality relationship is formed.",
author = "Torbj{\o}rn Skardhamar and Savolainen, {Jukka K} and Aase, {Kjersti N.} and Lyngstad, {Torkild H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/681557",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "385--446",
journal = "Crime and Justice",
issn = "0192-3234",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does marriage reduce crime?

AU - Skardhamar, Torbjørn

AU - Savolainen, Jukka K

AU - Aase, Kjersti N.

AU - Lyngstad, Torkild H.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The "marriage effect" is one of the most widely studied topics of life course criminology. The contemporary consensus is that marriage promotes desistance from crime. Most of the 58 studies reviewed here find a negative longitudinal association between marriage and crime. The results are more consistent among men. Studies that attend to relationship quality, such as the level of marital attachment, tend to produce particularly strong associations. Critical scrutiny of the evidence regarding the causal nature of the reported associations suggests, however, that claims about the restraining influence of marriage are overstated. None of the studies demonstrates evidence of direct (counterfactual) causality; no study has served a causal estimate unbiased by selection processes. Moreover, only a few studies address time ordering, and some of those show that desistance precedes rather than follows marriage. Evidence in support of the theoretical mechanisms responsible for the marriage effect is also mixed and insufficient. The criminological literature has been insensitive to the reality that entering a marital union is increasingly unlikely to signify the point at which a committed, high-quality relationship is formed.

AB - The "marriage effect" is one of the most widely studied topics of life course criminology. The contemporary consensus is that marriage promotes desistance from crime. Most of the 58 studies reviewed here find a negative longitudinal association between marriage and crime. The results are more consistent among men. Studies that attend to relationship quality, such as the level of marital attachment, tend to produce particularly strong associations. Critical scrutiny of the evidence regarding the causal nature of the reported associations suggests, however, that claims about the restraining influence of marriage are overstated. None of the studies demonstrates evidence of direct (counterfactual) causality; no study has served a causal estimate unbiased by selection processes. Moreover, only a few studies address time ordering, and some of those show that desistance precedes rather than follows marriage. Evidence in support of the theoretical mechanisms responsible for the marriage effect is also mixed and insufficient. The criminological literature has been insensitive to the reality that entering a marital union is increasingly unlikely to signify the point at which a committed, high-quality relationship is formed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947921851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947921851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/681557

DO - 10.1086/681557

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 385

EP - 446

JO - Crime and Justice

JF - Crime and Justice

SN - 0192-3234

IS - 1

ER -