Does lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome have an objective clinical basis?

Thiru M. Annaswamy, Samuel M. Bierner, Hima Doppalapudi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Degenerative processes can cause chronic low back pain that occasionally creates impingement of the lumbar dorsal rami, resulting in a clinical syndrome previously described as lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome (LDRS). Objectives: To evaluate the clinical basis of LDRS by comparing pain, disability, and objective measures of pathophysiology in 3 groups of subjects defined by needle electromyography examination (NEE) findings. Design: Prospective group cohort study with retrospective chart review. Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center outpatient clinic. Patients: Subjects who had undergone lower limb NEE and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A total of 71 subjects' records that met the study criteria were retrospectively reviewed for interventional spine procedures performed and to measure the lumbosacral paraspinal cross-sectional area (PSP CSA); 28 of the 71 subjects underwent further clinical assessment. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate group differences. Main Outcome Measurements: In the retrospective arm: (1) PSP CSAs measured at 4 lower lumbar disk levels (average of 3 consecutive slices/level) bilaterally and overall left and right lumbar average PSP CSA and (2) the frequency and type of interventional spine procedures performed. In the prospective arm: (1) temporal changes of NEE abnormalities, (2) pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale, (3) Pain Disability Questionnaire responses, and (4) Short Form-36 scores. Results: The right L5 CSA was significantly greater in the group with mechanical low back pain compared with the group with lumbar radicular syndrome (F= 3.3; P< .05). No significant group differences were noted in the number of spine procedures performed. No significant differences in pain or disability scores were found among the groups. NEE findings improved over time predominantly in the LDRS group. Conclusions: LDRS is a diagnosis with identifiable NEE (lumbar multifidus denervation) findings and magnetic resonance imaging findings that may include lower lumbar paraspinal atrophy. NEE (paraspinal denervation) findings in persons with LDRS may change over time, and the clinical relevance of LDRS to pain, functional disability, and treatment response is unclear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)996-1006
Number of pages11
JournalPM and R
Volume5
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Electromyography
Needles
Pain
Spine
Denervation
Low Back Pain
Arm
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Paraspinal Muscles
Veterans
Pain Measurement
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Atrophy
Lower Extremity
Analysis of Variance
Cohort Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Does lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome have an objective clinical basis? / Annaswamy, Thiru M.; Bierner, Samuel M.; Doppalapudi, Hima.

In: PM and R, Vol. 5, No. 12, 01.12.2013, p. 996-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Annaswamy, Thiru M. ; Bierner, Samuel M. ; Doppalapudi, Hima. / Does lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome have an objective clinical basis?. In: PM and R. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 12. pp. 996-1006.
@article{c5b1790bfb684dfe8f8ea2e0de89eccb,
title = "Does lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome have an objective clinical basis?",
abstract = "Background: Degenerative processes can cause chronic low back pain that occasionally creates impingement of the lumbar dorsal rami, resulting in a clinical syndrome previously described as lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome (LDRS). Objectives: To evaluate the clinical basis of LDRS by comparing pain, disability, and objective measures of pathophysiology in 3 groups of subjects defined by needle electromyography examination (NEE) findings. Design: Prospective group cohort study with retrospective chart review. Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center outpatient clinic. Patients: Subjects who had undergone lower limb NEE and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A total of 71 subjects' records that met the study criteria were retrospectively reviewed for interventional spine procedures performed and to measure the lumbosacral paraspinal cross-sectional area (PSP CSA); 28 of the 71 subjects underwent further clinical assessment. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate group differences. Main Outcome Measurements: In the retrospective arm: (1) PSP CSAs measured at 4 lower lumbar disk levels (average of 3 consecutive slices/level) bilaterally and overall left and right lumbar average PSP CSA and (2) the frequency and type of interventional spine procedures performed. In the prospective arm: (1) temporal changes of NEE abnormalities, (2) pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale, (3) Pain Disability Questionnaire responses, and (4) Short Form-36 scores. Results: The right L5 CSA was significantly greater in the group with mechanical low back pain compared with the group with lumbar radicular syndrome (F= 3.3; P< .05). No significant group differences were noted in the number of spine procedures performed. No significant differences in pain or disability scores were found among the groups. NEE findings improved over time predominantly in the LDRS group. Conclusions: LDRS is a diagnosis with identifiable NEE (lumbar multifidus denervation) findings and magnetic resonance imaging findings that may include lower lumbar paraspinal atrophy. NEE (paraspinal denervation) findings in persons with LDRS may change over time, and the clinical relevance of LDRS to pain, functional disability, and treatment response is unclear.",
author = "Annaswamy, {Thiru M.} and Bierner, {Samuel M.} and Hima Doppalapudi",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.07.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "996--1006",
journal = "PM and R",
issn = "1934-1482",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome have an objective clinical basis?

AU - Annaswamy, Thiru M.

AU - Bierner, Samuel M.

AU - Doppalapudi, Hima

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Background: Degenerative processes can cause chronic low back pain that occasionally creates impingement of the lumbar dorsal rami, resulting in a clinical syndrome previously described as lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome (LDRS). Objectives: To evaluate the clinical basis of LDRS by comparing pain, disability, and objective measures of pathophysiology in 3 groups of subjects defined by needle electromyography examination (NEE) findings. Design: Prospective group cohort study with retrospective chart review. Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center outpatient clinic. Patients: Subjects who had undergone lower limb NEE and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A total of 71 subjects' records that met the study criteria were retrospectively reviewed for interventional spine procedures performed and to measure the lumbosacral paraspinal cross-sectional area (PSP CSA); 28 of the 71 subjects underwent further clinical assessment. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate group differences. Main Outcome Measurements: In the retrospective arm: (1) PSP CSAs measured at 4 lower lumbar disk levels (average of 3 consecutive slices/level) bilaterally and overall left and right lumbar average PSP CSA and (2) the frequency and type of interventional spine procedures performed. In the prospective arm: (1) temporal changes of NEE abnormalities, (2) pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale, (3) Pain Disability Questionnaire responses, and (4) Short Form-36 scores. Results: The right L5 CSA was significantly greater in the group with mechanical low back pain compared with the group with lumbar radicular syndrome (F= 3.3; P< .05). No significant group differences were noted in the number of spine procedures performed. No significant differences in pain or disability scores were found among the groups. NEE findings improved over time predominantly in the LDRS group. Conclusions: LDRS is a diagnosis with identifiable NEE (lumbar multifidus denervation) findings and magnetic resonance imaging findings that may include lower lumbar paraspinal atrophy. NEE (paraspinal denervation) findings in persons with LDRS may change over time, and the clinical relevance of LDRS to pain, functional disability, and treatment response is unclear.

AB - Background: Degenerative processes can cause chronic low back pain that occasionally creates impingement of the lumbar dorsal rami, resulting in a clinical syndrome previously described as lumbar dorsal ramus syndrome (LDRS). Objectives: To evaluate the clinical basis of LDRS by comparing pain, disability, and objective measures of pathophysiology in 3 groups of subjects defined by needle electromyography examination (NEE) findings. Design: Prospective group cohort study with retrospective chart review. Setting: Veterans Affairs medical center outpatient clinic. Patients: Subjects who had undergone lower limb NEE and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A total of 71 subjects' records that met the study criteria were retrospectively reviewed for interventional spine procedures performed and to measure the lumbosacral paraspinal cross-sectional area (PSP CSA); 28 of the 71 subjects underwent further clinical assessment. One-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate group differences. Main Outcome Measurements: In the retrospective arm: (1) PSP CSAs measured at 4 lower lumbar disk levels (average of 3 consecutive slices/level) bilaterally and overall left and right lumbar average PSP CSA and (2) the frequency and type of interventional spine procedures performed. In the prospective arm: (1) temporal changes of NEE abnormalities, (2) pain measured using the Visual Analog Scale, (3) Pain Disability Questionnaire responses, and (4) Short Form-36 scores. Results: The right L5 CSA was significantly greater in the group with mechanical low back pain compared with the group with lumbar radicular syndrome (F= 3.3; P< .05). No significant group differences were noted in the number of spine procedures performed. No significant differences in pain or disability scores were found among the groups. NEE findings improved over time predominantly in the LDRS group. Conclusions: LDRS is a diagnosis with identifiable NEE (lumbar multifidus denervation) findings and magnetic resonance imaging findings that may include lower lumbar paraspinal atrophy. NEE (paraspinal denervation) findings in persons with LDRS may change over time, and the clinical relevance of LDRS to pain, functional disability, and treatment response is unclear.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890131122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890131122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.07.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 23994120

AN - SCOPUS:84890131122

VL - 5

SP - 996

EP - 1006

JO - PM and R

JF - PM and R

SN - 1934-1482

IS - 12

ER -