Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research

Anna E. Jaffe, David DiLillo, Lesa Hoffman, Michelle Haikalis, Rita E. Dykstra

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are sometimes hesitant to approve trauma-related research due to concerns that asking participants about traumatic experiences will induce extreme distress. Despite the growing empirical literature examining participants' reactions to trauma-related research, no quantitative reviews have been conducted. The present multilevel meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify: (1) how participants react to trauma-related research overall; (2) to what extent reactions to trauma-related research differ by participant characteristics, including personal history of trauma, PTSD symptoms, and gender; and (3) to what extent (a) type of traumatic experience and (b) mode of administration moderate these effects. Studies examining adult participants' reactions to trauma assessments in the context of research were included. Results from 73,959 participants across 70 samples suggest that although trauma-related research can lead to some immediate psychological distress, this distress is not extreme. This distress is greater for individuals with a trauma history or PTSD, particularly in studies involving interviews. However, individuals generally find research participation to be a positive experience and do not regret participation, regardless of trauma history or PTSD. There were no gender differences in reactions. Present findings, which suggest that trauma-related research can continue without harming participants, may help inform IRB decisions on trauma research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-56
Number of pages17
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Research Ethics Committees
Multilevel Analysis
Emotions
Interviews
Psychology

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Multilevel meta-analysis
  • PTSD
  • Research participation
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. / Jaffe, Anna E.; DiLillo, David; Hoffman, Lesa; Haikalis, Michelle; Dykstra, Rita E.

In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 40, 01.08.2015, p. 40-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Jaffe, Anna E. ; DiLillo, David ; Hoffman, Lesa ; Haikalis, Michelle ; Dykstra, Rita E. / Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. In: Clinical Psychology Review. 2015 ; Vol. 40. pp. 40-56.
@article{721e6cfe61534b3790592eebe83b52da,
title = "Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research",
abstract = "Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are sometimes hesitant to approve trauma-related research due to concerns that asking participants about traumatic experiences will induce extreme distress. Despite the growing empirical literature examining participants' reactions to trauma-related research, no quantitative reviews have been conducted. The present multilevel meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify: (1) how participants react to trauma-related research overall; (2) to what extent reactions to trauma-related research differ by participant characteristics, including personal history of trauma, PTSD symptoms, and gender; and (3) to what extent (a) type of traumatic experience and (b) mode of administration moderate these effects. Studies examining adult participants' reactions to trauma assessments in the context of research were included. Results from 73,959 participants across 70 samples suggest that although trauma-related research can lead to some immediate psychological distress, this distress is not extreme. This distress is greater for individuals with a trauma history or PTSD, particularly in studies involving interviews. However, individuals generally find research participation to be a positive experience and do not regret participation, regardless of trauma history or PTSD. There were no gender differences in reactions. Present findings, which suggest that trauma-related research can continue without harming participants, may help inform IRB decisions on trauma research.",
keywords = "Ethics, Multilevel meta-analysis, PTSD, Research participation, Trauma",
author = "Jaffe, {Anna E.} and David DiLillo and Lesa Hoffman and Michelle Haikalis and Dykstra, {Rita E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "40--56",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research

AU - Jaffe, Anna E.

AU - DiLillo, David

AU - Hoffman, Lesa

AU - Haikalis, Michelle

AU - Dykstra, Rita E.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are sometimes hesitant to approve trauma-related research due to concerns that asking participants about traumatic experiences will induce extreme distress. Despite the growing empirical literature examining participants' reactions to trauma-related research, no quantitative reviews have been conducted. The present multilevel meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify: (1) how participants react to trauma-related research overall; (2) to what extent reactions to trauma-related research differ by participant characteristics, including personal history of trauma, PTSD symptoms, and gender; and (3) to what extent (a) type of traumatic experience and (b) mode of administration moderate these effects. Studies examining adult participants' reactions to trauma assessments in the context of research were included. Results from 73,959 participants across 70 samples suggest that although trauma-related research can lead to some immediate psychological distress, this distress is not extreme. This distress is greater for individuals with a trauma history or PTSD, particularly in studies involving interviews. However, individuals generally find research participation to be a positive experience and do not regret participation, regardless of trauma history or PTSD. There were no gender differences in reactions. Present findings, which suggest that trauma-related research can continue without harming participants, may help inform IRB decisions on trauma research.

AB - Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are sometimes hesitant to approve trauma-related research due to concerns that asking participants about traumatic experiences will induce extreme distress. Despite the growing empirical literature examining participants' reactions to trauma-related research, no quantitative reviews have been conducted. The present multilevel meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify: (1) how participants react to trauma-related research overall; (2) to what extent reactions to trauma-related research differ by participant characteristics, including personal history of trauma, PTSD symptoms, and gender; and (3) to what extent (a) type of traumatic experience and (b) mode of administration moderate these effects. Studies examining adult participants' reactions to trauma assessments in the context of research were included. Results from 73,959 participants across 70 samples suggest that although trauma-related research can lead to some immediate psychological distress, this distress is not extreme. This distress is greater for individuals with a trauma history or PTSD, particularly in studies involving interviews. However, individuals generally find research participation to be a positive experience and do not regret participation, regardless of trauma history or PTSD. There were no gender differences in reactions. Present findings, which suggest that trauma-related research can continue without harming participants, may help inform IRB decisions on trauma research.

KW - Ethics

KW - Multilevel meta-analysis

KW - PTSD

KW - Research participation

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930684564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930684564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004

M3 - Review article

C2 - 26051308

AN - SCOPUS:84930684564

VL - 40

SP - 40

EP - 56

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

ER -