Does Gallbladder Ejection Fraction Predict Outcome after Cholecystectomy for Suspected Chronic Acalculous Gallbladder Dysfunction? A Systematic Review

John K. DiBaise, Dmitry Oleynikov

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The clinical utility of cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy with calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in patients with suspected chronic acalculous gallbladder dysfunction (CAGD) remains controversial. It was our aim to critically evaluate the literature on the utility of the GBEF to predict outcome of patients with suspected CAGD. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE database for articles published between 1980 and 2002 and a manual search of references from bibliographies of identified articles. Only articles in English that concerned adults were screened. Data extracted included both qualitative and quantitative data reported on the study groups, cholescintigraphic technique, interventions, treatment outcomes, and trial methodologic characteristics. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. All were considered of poor methodologic quality. All but three studies were retrospective case series, only one was randomized, and none were adequately blinded, used adequate controls, or enrolled a sufficient number of patients. Five studies used a cut-off value for an abnormal GBEF that was different than the value used by the others, one study did not provide a cut-off value, and several did not report details of the cholescintigraphic technique (namely, the rate of cholecystokinin infusion). Studies varied in their outcome measures and the criteria for success. The overall assessment of outcome in 19 studies concluded that calculation of a GBEF was useful in patients with suspected CAGD. The low methodologic quality of the studies precluded a meta-analysis approach to the data. Use of a calculated GBEF to diagnose and predict treatment outcome in suspected CAGD has not been adequately studied. Although most studies report utility of GBEF in predicting symptom outcome after cholecystectomy in patients with suspected CAGD, quality evidence is lacking, thereby precluding a definitive recommendation regarding its use. More high quality trials are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2605-2611
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume98
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Cholecystectomy
Gallbladder
Cholecystokinin
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Bibliography
MEDLINE
Publications
Meta-Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{0043b982cd7a41b5ba548694c7315dee,
title = "Does Gallbladder Ejection Fraction Predict Outcome after Cholecystectomy for Suspected Chronic Acalculous Gallbladder Dysfunction? A Systematic Review",
abstract = "The clinical utility of cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy with calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in patients with suspected chronic acalculous gallbladder dysfunction (CAGD) remains controversial. It was our aim to critically evaluate the literature on the utility of the GBEF to predict outcome of patients with suspected CAGD. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE database for articles published between 1980 and 2002 and a manual search of references from bibliographies of identified articles. Only articles in English that concerned adults were screened. Data extracted included both qualitative and quantitative data reported on the study groups, cholescintigraphic technique, interventions, treatment outcomes, and trial methodologic characteristics. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. All were considered of poor methodologic quality. All but three studies were retrospective case series, only one was randomized, and none were adequately blinded, used adequate controls, or enrolled a sufficient number of patients. Five studies used a cut-off value for an abnormal GBEF that was different than the value used by the others, one study did not provide a cut-off value, and several did not report details of the cholescintigraphic technique (namely, the rate of cholecystokinin infusion). Studies varied in their outcome measures and the criteria for success. The overall assessment of outcome in 19 studies concluded that calculation of a GBEF was useful in patients with suspected CAGD. The low methodologic quality of the studies precluded a meta-analysis approach to the data. Use of a calculated GBEF to diagnose and predict treatment outcome in suspected CAGD has not been adequately studied. Although most studies report utility of GBEF in predicting symptom outcome after cholecystectomy in patients with suspected CAGD, quality evidence is lacking, thereby precluding a definitive recommendation regarding its use. More high quality trials are needed.",
author = "DiBaise, {John K.} and Dmitry Oleynikov",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08772.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "2605--2611",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Gallbladder Ejection Fraction Predict Outcome after Cholecystectomy for Suspected Chronic Acalculous Gallbladder Dysfunction? A Systematic Review

AU - DiBaise, John K.

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The clinical utility of cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy with calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in patients with suspected chronic acalculous gallbladder dysfunction (CAGD) remains controversial. It was our aim to critically evaluate the literature on the utility of the GBEF to predict outcome of patients with suspected CAGD. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE database for articles published between 1980 and 2002 and a manual search of references from bibliographies of identified articles. Only articles in English that concerned adults were screened. Data extracted included both qualitative and quantitative data reported on the study groups, cholescintigraphic technique, interventions, treatment outcomes, and trial methodologic characteristics. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. All were considered of poor methodologic quality. All but three studies were retrospective case series, only one was randomized, and none were adequately blinded, used adequate controls, or enrolled a sufficient number of patients. Five studies used a cut-off value for an abnormal GBEF that was different than the value used by the others, one study did not provide a cut-off value, and several did not report details of the cholescintigraphic technique (namely, the rate of cholecystokinin infusion). Studies varied in their outcome measures and the criteria for success. The overall assessment of outcome in 19 studies concluded that calculation of a GBEF was useful in patients with suspected CAGD. The low methodologic quality of the studies precluded a meta-analysis approach to the data. Use of a calculated GBEF to diagnose and predict treatment outcome in suspected CAGD has not been adequately studied. Although most studies report utility of GBEF in predicting symptom outcome after cholecystectomy in patients with suspected CAGD, quality evidence is lacking, thereby precluding a definitive recommendation regarding its use. More high quality trials are needed.

AB - The clinical utility of cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy with calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) in patients with suspected chronic acalculous gallbladder dysfunction (CAGD) remains controversial. It was our aim to critically evaluate the literature on the utility of the GBEF to predict outcome of patients with suspected CAGD. We performed an electronic search of the MEDLINE database for articles published between 1980 and 2002 and a manual search of references from bibliographies of identified articles. Only articles in English that concerned adults were screened. Data extracted included both qualitative and quantitative data reported on the study groups, cholescintigraphic technique, interventions, treatment outcomes, and trial methodologic characteristics. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria. All were considered of poor methodologic quality. All but three studies were retrospective case series, only one was randomized, and none were adequately blinded, used adequate controls, or enrolled a sufficient number of patients. Five studies used a cut-off value for an abnormal GBEF that was different than the value used by the others, one study did not provide a cut-off value, and several did not report details of the cholescintigraphic technique (namely, the rate of cholecystokinin infusion). Studies varied in their outcome measures and the criteria for success. The overall assessment of outcome in 19 studies concluded that calculation of a GBEF was useful in patients with suspected CAGD. The low methodologic quality of the studies precluded a meta-analysis approach to the data. Use of a calculated GBEF to diagnose and predict treatment outcome in suspected CAGD has not been adequately studied. Although most studies report utility of GBEF in predicting symptom outcome after cholecystectomy in patients with suspected CAGD, quality evidence is lacking, thereby precluding a definitive recommendation regarding its use. More high quality trials are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347364712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347364712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08772.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08772.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 98

SP - 2605

EP - 2611

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 12

ER -